12206
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 12206-12207
Enantioselective Total Synthesis of the Kinesin Motor
Protein Inhibitor Adociasulfate 1
Michael Bogensta¨tter, Anja Limberg, Larry E. Overman,* and
Adam L. Tomasi
Department of Chemistry, 516 Rowland Hall
UniVersity of California, IrVine
IrVine, California 92697-2025
ReceiVed September 20, 1999
nucleophilicity of the arene were borne out in early scouting
studies when treatment of 7 with a variety of Lewis acids under
a range of reaction conditions delivered only bi-, tri-, and
tetracyclic products and not the desired pentacycle 8. This failure
led us to examine the pivotal tetracyclization with a polyene
substrate containing an additional activating substituent at the 3′-
position of the arene, an approach that culminated in the total
synthesis of 1.
Utilizing the energy of ATP hydrolysis, the kinesin super family
of motor proteins is responsible for movement of cellular cargo
along microtubule tracks from the center of eukaryotic cells to
their periphery (anterograde transport).1 These proteins are
important targets for inhibition since they play a necessary role
in cell division2 and in vesicle and organelle transport.3 A family
of hexaprenoid hydroquinone sulfates, the adociasulfates (e.g.,
1-5), was isolated recently from extracts of the sea sponge
Haliclona (a.k.a. Adocia) sp. collected off Palau,4,5 and Queen-
sland, Australia.6 Adociasulfates 1 (1) and 2 (2) and congeners 3
and 4 inhibit members of the kinesin motor protein super family
in the low micromolar range and are the first kinesin inhibitors
identified that are not nucleotide analogues.4,5 Kinesin inhibition
by the most extensively investigated of these, 2, has been shown
to result from interfering with microtubule binding.4 Adociasul-
fates 1 (1) and 7 (5) have also been reported to be proton pump
inhibitors.6 Motivated by the opportunity to exploit the tools of
synthesis to enhance understanding of kinesin inhibition by the
adociasulfates, we undertook as our initial objective the total
synthesis of these novel hydroquinone bis-sulfates.
Geranylgeraniol cyclization substrate 19 was assembled from
the union of two geraniol-derived fragments, 14 and 13 (Scheme
1). The sulfone piece 14 was prepared according to literature
procedures,11 while allylic bromide 13 was accessed by initially
alkylating the lithium reagent derived from aryl bromide 9 with
silyl-protected allylic bromide 10.12 Discharge of the silyl-
protecting group of 11 and standard conversion to the allylic
bromide provided 13 in 56% overall yield from 9. Coupling of
the potassium salt of 14 with 13 furnished isomerically pure 15
in nearly quantitative yield.13 Desulfonylation of this intermediate
was initially problematic; for example, reduction of 15 with Na
(EtOH-THF) or Li (EtNH2) gave mixtures of tetraene stereo-
and regioisomers. Selectivity in the reduction of the allylic sulfone
was finally achieved by the method of Inomata14 by treating the
crude coupled product with LiEt3BH and Pd(dppp) at 0 °C to
furnish isomerically pure tetraene 16 on multigram scales in 64%
yield for the coupling and desulfonylation steps. It is notable in
this transformation, and not presaged in earlier publications, that
competing reduction of the allylic silyl ether functionality is
minimal when the reduction is conducted at 0 °C.15 The phenol
was reprotected and the silyl ether-protecting group was removed
with acidic methanol to provide 17. Sharpless asymmetric
epoxidation16 of 17 using the catalyst derived from (+)-diethyl
tartrate generated 18 (in 95% yield and 95% ee), which was
O-benzylated to give 19.
A variety of Lewis acids and cyclization conditions were
screened to induce polyene tetracyclization of 19 in CH2Cl2
(Scheme 2). Pentacycle 20 was produced in ∼10% yield using
BF3‚Et2O (-94 f -50 °C) or FeCl3‚6H2O (23 °C),17 whereas
MeAlCl2 (-90 f 0 °C), the Lewis acid reported optimal for
epoxide-initiated tetracyclizations terminated by enoxysilanes,8
gave only trace amounts (<5%) of 20. Of the Lewis acids
screened to date, Sc(OTf)3 (-90 f 0 °C) is optimal and provides
Hexacyclic hydroquinone 6 is a potential precursor of adocia-
sulfates 1-5. This intermediate contains nine stereogenic carbon
centers, of which eight are contiguous and four are quaternary.
Inspired by the pioneering investigations of Eschenmoser, Stork,
van Tamelen, Johnson, and Corey, we envisaged construction of
the bulk of this challenging stereochemical array in one step by
a cationic polyene cyclization.7 Recent notable success by the
Corey group in nonenzymatic epoxide-initiated polyene tetracy-
clizations8 suggested that 6 might be obtained by the cyclization
cascade shown in eq 1. From the outset we were mindful that
the two known epoxide-initiated polyene tetracyclizations featured
termination of the cationic cyclization by an enoxysilane,8 while
the proposed tetracyclization of 7 would require termination by
a significantly less-nucleophilic arene.9,10 Our concerns about the
(8) (a) Corey, E. J.; Luo, G.; Lin, L. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119,
9927-9928. (b) Corey, E. J.; Luo, G.; Lin, L. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
1998, 37, 1126-1128.
(9) Kinetic investigations by Mayr and co-workers place the reactivity of
anisole and 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene toward carbenium ion electrophiles 7
and 2 powers of 10 below that of 1-(trimethylsiloxy)cyclohexene.10
(10) (a) Mayr, H.; Patz, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 938-
957. (b) Burfeindt, J.; Patz, M.; Muller, M.; Mayr, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1998, 120, 3629-3634.
(1) Hirokawa, N. Science 1998, 279, 519-526.
(2) (a) Walczak, C. E.; Mitchison, T. J. Cell 1996, 85, 943-946. (b)
Kashina, A. S.; Rogers, G. C.; Scholey, J. M. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1997,
1357, 257-271.
(11) Chappe, B.; Musikas, H.; Marie, D.; Ourisson, G. Bull. Chem. Soc.
Jpn. 1988, 61, 141-148.
(12) Corey, E. J.; Tius, M. A.; Jagabandhu, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980,
102, 1742-1744.
(3) Sheetz, M. P. Cell Struct. Funct. 1996, 21, 369-373.
(4) Sakowicz, R.; Berdelis, M. S.; Ray, K.; Blackburn, C. L.; Hopmann,
C.; Faulkner, D. J.; Goldstein, L. S. B. Science 1998, 280, 292-295.
(5) Blackburn, C. L.; Hopmann, C.; Sakowicz, R.; Berdelis, M. S.;
Goldstein, L. S. B.; Faulkner, D. J. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 5565-5570.
(6) Kalaitzis, J. A.; de Almeida Leone, P.; Harris, L.; Butler, M. S.; Ngo,
A.; Hooper, J. N. A.; Quinn, R. J. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 5571-5574.
(7) For a recent review, see: Sutherland, J. K. In ComprehensiVe Organic
Synthesis; Trost, B. M., Fleming, I., Eds.; Pergamon: Oxford, 1991; Vol. 3,
pp 341-377.
(13) Fujita, Y.; Ishiguro, M.; Onishi, T.; Nishida, T. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.
1982, 55, 1325-1326.
(14) Mohri, M.; Kinoshita, H.; Inomata, K.; Kotake, H. Chem. Lett. 1985,
451-454.
(15) Hutchins, R. O.; Learn, K. J. Org. Chem. 1982, 47, 4380-4382.
(16) Gao, Y.; Hanson, R. M.; Klunder, J. M.; Ko, S. Y.; Masamune, H.;
Sharpless, K. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 5765-5780.
(17) Sen, S. E.; Roach, S. L.; Smith, S. M.; Zhang, Y. z. Tetrahedron Lett.
1998, 39, 3969-3972.
10.1021/ja9934091 CCC: $18.00 © 1999 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 12/14/1999