J. Moon, S. Lee / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 694 (2009) 473–477
477
Pd2(dba)3(1.25 mol%)
1 (2.5 mol%)
NaOtBu (1.2 equiv)
i-PrOH, 80 oC
Ar
X
Ar
H
H
F
L
Pd(0)
Ar
Pd(II)
Ar
20% yield
L
L
Pd(II)
X
Scheme 1. Palladium-catalyzed defluorination.
H
O
Ar
Pd2(dba)3(0. 25 mol%)
Ligand (0.5 mol%) or no Ligand
O
L
Pd(II)
O
H
H
Br
tBu
Cs2CO3 (1.2 equiv)
tBu
X
Cyclohexanol, 120 oC
Fig. 3. General mechanism of Pd-catalyzed dehalogenation.
100
80
60
40
20
0
phites accelerated the reductive elimination steps. Further
mechanistic studies of the reactivity of phosphite ligand are in
progress in our laboratory.
Phosphite 1
PPh3
no ligand
In conclusion, we demonstrated that the sterically hindered
phosphites exhibited good reactivities as ligands in the dehalogen-
ation of aryl bromides and chlorides. To the best of our knowledge,
this is the first report of the use of phosphite as a ligand in dehalo-
genation reactions. Aryl chloride required 2.5 mol% catalyst and a
strong base, while 0.5 mol% catalytic loading was sufficient for
the debromination of aryl bromide in the presence of a weak base.
Aryl bromides bearing functional groups such as alkyl, alkoxy, hy-
droxyl, ether, chloro, phenyl, amide, benzyl and ketone can be
transformed to the corresponding debrominated products in high
yields.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Reaction Time (h)
Fig. 2. Reaction rate of debromination with phosphite 1 and PPh3.
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by the Korea Research Foundation
Grant Funded by the Korean Government (MOEHRD, Basic Re-
search Promotion Fund) (KRF-2006-003-C-00178).
dechlorination, the yield of defluorinated product, benzene, was
only 20% as determined by GC. This low yield was attributed to
the strong bond formed between carbon and fluorine atoms.
We compared the reaction rates of the phosphite ligand 1 and
PPh3 in the debromination of 1-bromo-4-tert-butylbenzene. As
shown in Fig. 2, phosphite 1 showed better catalytic activity than
PPh3. In addition, the debromination without ligand showed very
low reactivity.
References
[1] E.-i. Negishi, A. de Meijere (Eds.), Handbook of Organopalladium Chemistry for
Organic Synthesis, Wiley, 2002.
[2] A. de Meijere, F. Diederich, Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions, 2nd ed.,
vols. 1 and 2, Wiley-VCH, 2004.
The general mechanism of the palladium-catalyzed dehalogen-
ation is described in Fig. 3 [23]. The palladium(0) is the catalyti-
cally active species that generates the oxidative adduct complex.
Metal alkoxide, which is generated from the reaction with alcohol
and base, attacks the palladium and displaces the halogen atom.
The palladium-hydride complex that is produced through the
beta hydride elimination affords a reduced arene product and
regenerates the palladium(0) catalyst. The fact that the cyclohex-
anone was obtained with the same amount of debrominated
[3] A.F. Littke, C. Dai, G.C. Fu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122 (2000) 4020.
[4] A.F. Littke, L. Schwarz, G.C. Fu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124 (2002) 6343.
[5] A. Soheili, J. Albaneze-Walker, J.A. Murry, P.G. Dormer, D.L. Hughes, Org. Lett. 5
(2003) 4191.
[6] E.M. Vogl, S.L. Buchwald, J. Org. Chem. 67 (2002) 106.
[7] I.T. Raheem, S.N. Goodman, E.N. Jacobsen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126 (2004) 706.
[8] K.W. Anderson, S.L. Buchwald, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 44 (2005) 6173.
[9] For leading references, see: S.P. Nolan, N-Heterocyclic Carbenes in Synthesis,
Wiley-VCH, New York, 2006.
[10] J. Ju, H. Nam, H.M. Jung, S. Lee, Tetrahedron Lett. 47 (2006) 8673.
[11] J. Moon, H. Nam, J. Ju, M. Jeong, S. Lee, Chem. Lett. 36 (2007) 1432.
[12] C.E. Castro, Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 155 (1998) 1.
[13] A.M. Zawisza, J. Muzart, Tetrahedron Lett. 48 (2007) 6738.
[14] A. Arcadi, G. Cerichelli, M. Chiarini, R. Vico, D. Zorzan, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 16
(2004) 3404.
[15] M.S. Viciu, G.A. Grasa, S.P. Nolan, Organometallics 20 (2001) 3607.
[16] K. Fujita, M. Owaki, R. Yamaguchi, Chem. Commun. (2002) 2964.
[17] H. Guo, K.-I. Kannao, T. Takahashi, Chem. Lett. 33 (2004) 1356.
[18] S. Kuhl, R. Schneider, Y. Fort, Adv. Synth. Catal. 345 (2003) 341.
[19] C. Desmarets, S. Kuhl, R. Schneider, Y. Fort, Organometallics 21 (2002) 1554.
[20] O. Navarro, N. Marion, Y. Oonishi, R.A. Kelly III, S.P. Nolan, J. Org. Chem. 71
(2006) 685.
products in all case of Table
mechanism.
4 supported the proposed
The phosphorus atom of phosphite 1 is more electron-poor
than that of triphenylphosphine. However, the former had better
reactivity than the latter, as shown in Fig. 2, which is contrary to
the general belief that electron-rich ligands accelerate the rate of
oxidative addition of aryl halides [24]. It is generally believed that
the rate determining step for dehalogenation is the oxidative
addition of aryl halides. However, in this case, we believe that
the phosphite ligand exerted much greater effect on both the beta
[21] J. Chen, Y. Zhang, L. Yang, X. Zhang, J. Liu, L. Li, H. Zhang, Tetrahedron 63 (2007)
4266.
[22] F. Alonso, Y. Moglie, G. Radivoy, C. Vitale, M. Yus, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 271
(2004) 171.
[23] O. Navarro, H. Kaur, P. Mahjoor, S.P. Nolan, J. Org. Chem. 69 (2004) 3173.
[24] A. Zapf, M. Beller, Chem. Eur. J. 6 (2000) 1830.
hydride elimination and the reductive elimination steps. The
p
acceptor phosphite ligand accelerated the beta hydride elimina-
tion step while the sterically bulky substituted group in phos-