2014 J. Phys. Chem. A, Vol. 104, No. 10, 2000
Braun et al.
to intact parent (ferrocene) ions. Determination of the IE of
ferrocene by one-photon VUV ionization or electron impact
yielded slightly different values of 6.75 eV,7 6.72 eV (adiabatic)
and 6.86 eV (vertical),15 and 6.99 eV.12 In our work, the value
of 6.75 eV for the adiabatic ionization energy (AIE) is adopted.
This value is 0.55 eV above the dissociation energy E2.
We would like to point out that soft ionization of ferrocene
with a two-photon process because of a fast dissociation in the
intermediate state is not possible but that the detailed mechanism
of dissociation is of minor importance in our experiment.
Therefore, in the ferrocene derivatives containing a chromophore
used in this work, we can exclude any direct local ionization at
the ferrocene site. The investigated ferrocene derivatives (see
Figure 1, parts 2a and 2b) basically consist of a ferrocene or
[3]ferrocenophane (1,1′-(1,3-propandiyl)ferrocene) (see Figure
1, parts 1a and 1b, respectively) unit attached to a chromophore
molecule with distinct spectroscopic properties. The clear
distinction of different excitation pathways at the ferrocene site
and the chromophore site is crucial for our investigations of
charge transfer processes after local ionization of a chromophore
moiety with the higher local IE.
H 5.40, Fe 17.54, N 4.58%. IR (KBr, cm-1): ν ) 1646 (s, ν
(CdN)); MS (CI, %): m/z ) 315 (100, M+); 212 (68, M+-
CNPh); UV/VIS (CH2 Cl2, nm): λmax (ꢀ) ) 442 (250); 354
1
(2600); 284 (27 000); 232 (38 000); H NMR (C6D6, 400.13
3
MHz, ppm): δ ) 7.19 (t, 2H, m-Ph, JHH ) 7.4 Hz); 6.94 (t,
3
3
1H, p-Ph, JHH ) 7.4 Hz); 6.83 (d, 2H, o-Ph, JHH ) 7.5 Hz);
4.03 (s, 4H, C5H4); 3.95 (“t”, 2H, C5H4); 3.81 (“t”, 2H, C5H4);
2.92 (s, 2H, CH2); 2.54 (s, 2H, CH2); 13C NMR (C6D6, 100.63
MHz, ppm): δ ) 171.4 (CdN); 151.6 (i-Ph); 129.3 (m-Ph);
123.3 (p-Ph); 119.9 (o-Ph); 76.6; 76.3 (i-C5H4); 70.2; 70.0; 70.0;
69.9 (C5H4); 37.1; 27.7 (CH2).
2-(N-Phenyl)amino-[3]-Ferrocenophane. To 38 mg (1 mmol)
LiAlH4 in 10 mL of dry diethyl ether a solution of 315 mg (1
mmol) [3]-ferrocenophan-2-phenylimine in 50 mL dry diethyl
ether is added dropwise. After addition of the substrate the
reaction is stirred for 2 h at ambient temperature. For the workup
the reaction mixture is cooled in an ice bath, and very carefully
ice water is added dropwise to the reaction mixture. After the
H2 evolution has ceased the organic phase is decanted and the
water phase is extracted twice with diethyl ether. The combined
ether extracts are washed with 20 mL of a saturated NaCl
solution, separated, and dried. After evaporation of the solvent
the residue is recrystallized from n-hexane yielding 301 mg
(95%) of orange crystals.
2. Experimental Section
2.1. Ferrocene Derivatives. The ferrocene derivatives have
to fulfill several conditions to be suitable for our purposes to
detect charge transfer processes. The chromophore molecule has
to show strong absorption in a spectral range where the
absorpion coefficient of ferrocene is relatively weak. Moreover
the chosen ferrocene derivative should have sufficient gas
pressure at moderate temperatures and decompose only negli-
gibly when heated and vaporized. Among various synthesized
derivatives we found two suitable compounds with an aniline-
like chromophore. In Figure 1 the structures of different
ferrocenes are shown. In Figure 1, part 1a, the ferrocene
molecule is displayed, and in Figure 1, part 1b, the ferro-
cenophane (bridged ferrocene) is shown. The chemical structures
of the derivatives with chromophore aniline are shown in Figure
1, parts 2a, and 2b respectively: (2a) n-(ferrocenylmethyl)aniline
(2b) 2-(n-phenyl)amino-[3]-ferrocenophane. The main difference
between the two molecules 2a and 2b in Figure 1 is that in 2a
the aniline chromophore is attached to one cp ring whereas in
the case of 2b the aniline is bound to the handle that connects
the two cp rings. The idea behind this selection of structures
was that the charge produced after local ionization of the aniline
site moves along different paths between the moieties of the
respective molecules and, thus, any effects caused by the
different migration paths can be examined.
Mp. 165-167 °C. Mw: 317.21 g/mol (C19H19FeN) EA (%):
calcd.: C 71.94, H 6.03, Fe 17.60, N 4.42, found: C 71.98, H
6.10, Fe 17.48, N 4.63; IR (KBr, cm-1): ν ) 3379 (s, ν(NH),
st); 3077 (m, ν(CH), st, Cp); 1599 (s, ν(CdC), st); 1503 (s,
ν(CdC), st); MS (CI, %): m/z ) 317 (100, M+); 238 (41, M+-
MeCp); 214 (5, M+-CNPh); 158 (2, M+-CNPh-Fe); 135 (12,
M+-CNPh-MeCp); UV/VIS (CH2Cl2, nm): λmax (ꢀ) ) 442
(240); 298 (4600); 284 (7200); 250 (29 000); 232 (38 000); 1H
NMR (CD2Cl2, 400.13 MHz, ppm): ꢀ ) 7.19 (t, 2H, m-Ph,
3JHH ) 7.2 Hz); 6.68 (m, 3H, o- + p-Ph); 4.11 (s, 4H, C5H4);
4.07 (“t”, 2H, C5H4); 4.03 (“t”, 2H, C5H4); 3.91 (br, 1H, NH);
3
3.82 (tt, 1H, CH, JHH ) 3.0/11.1 Hz); 2.71 (dd, 2H, CHHcis,
3
2
2JHH ) 13.8 Hz, JHH ) 2.6 Hz); 1.71 (dd, CHHtrans, JHH
)
3
1
13.8 Hz, JHH ) 11.2 Hz). 3C NMR (CD2Cl2, 100.63 MHz,
ppm): ꢀ ) 147.6 (i-Ph); 129.7 (m-Ph); 117.6 (p-Ph); 113.3 (o-
Ph); 82.0 (i-C5H4); 71.6; 69.6; 68.4; 68.3 (C5H4); 60.6 (CH);
32.1 (CH2).
2.1.3. Laser Mass Spectrometry. The experimental setup used
was described in detail elsewhere.18 Briefly, it consists of two
dye lasers yielding light pulses with a bandwidth of ∼0.3 cm-1
(fwhm) and a duration of ∼15 ns (fwhm) (FL 3002, and LPD
3000; Lambda Physik). The dye lasers are pumped synchro-
nously by a XeCl excimer laser (EMG 1003i, Lambda Physik).
The two counter-propagating laser beams intersect a skimmed
supersonic molecular beam perpendicularly 15 cm downstream
from the nozzle orifice. The light pulses overlap in time and
space in the acceleration region of a linear reflecting time-of-
flight mass spectrometer.19 The supersonic jet is obtained by
expanding argon carrier gas with a backing pressure of 3 bar
into the vacuum with a heated, pulsed (10 Hz repetition rate)
valve. The samples of the investigated ferrocenes were heated
to 160 °C in a sample chamber close to the nozzle of the valve.
At this temperature, little thermal decomposition of the inves-
tigated ferrocene derivatives takes place. After the experiment,
the remaining substances were removed and analyzed by NMR
and electron impact mass spectrometry. No products originating
from thermal decomposition could be found. To check if
sufficient amounts of the substances were evaporated, mass
spectra with sharply focused laser light at the highest available
laser power were recorded, thus forcing complete fragmentation
2.1.1. Synthesis of n-(ferrocenylmethyl)aniline. This com-
pound was synthesized according to the literature16 and purified
by recrystallization from n-hexane prior to use.
2.1.2. 2-(n-Phenyl)amino-[3]-Ferrocenophane ([3]-Ferro-
cenophan-2-Phenylamine). [3]-Ferrocenophane-2-Phenylimine
(precursor). 600 mg (2.5 mmol) of [3]-ferrocenophan-2-one17
are placed in a 100 mL round-bottom flask together with ca.
50 mg anhydrous ZnCl2 and 5 g of molecular sieves (4 Å).
Subsequently, 0.45 mL (5 mmol) aniline and 40 mL dry toluene
are added. The reaction mixture is refluxed for 12 h and filtered
after cooling to room temperature. After extraction of the residue
twice with 10 mL of toluene the combined extracts are freed of
solvent. The resulting yellow powder is recrystallized from
CH2Cl2/n-hexane yielding 615 mg (78%) of yellow crystals.
Mp. 174 °C; elementary analysis (mw (C19H17FeN): 315.20)
calcd.: C 72.40, H 5.44, Fe 17.72, N 4.44%. Found: C 72.19,