substitution,4 Rh-catalyzed C-H activation,5 Cu-catalyzed
conjugate addition,6 rhodium-catalyzed conjugate addition and
enolate protonations,7 and enantioselective H-atom transfer
reactions.8 Because of its inherent efficiency and atom economy,
asymmetric hydrogenation of prochiral dehydro-precursors of
â2-amino acid derivatives represents one of the most efficient
and simplest methods. However, to our knowledge, only a few
examples of the hydrogenation of â2-dehydroamino acid precur-
sors may be found in the literature, and in most cases, the results
are less than satisfactory.9 Jackson et al.9a reported that
enantioselective hydrogenation of some R,â-unsaturated nitriles
bearing a phthalimidomethyl substituent at the R-carbon using
Rh-DuPHOS catalysts afforded â2-amino acid precursors with
moderate ee values of up to 48%, while hydrogenation of the
corresponding R,â-unsaturated carboxylic acid methyl esters
using a Ru-BINAP catalyst gave higher ee values of up to 84%.
Robinson et al.9b described the enantioselective hydrogenation
of a series of (E)-R-substituted â-amidoacrylates using Rh-
catalysts with chiral bidentate phosphine ligands (BPE and
DuPHOS), which gave â2-amino acid derivatives with enanti-
oselectivities of up to 67%. Very recently, Minnaard and Feringa
et al.9c reported the synthesis of â2-amino acids via asymmetric
rhodium-catalyzed hydrogenation of â-substituted R-acetylami-
nomethylacrylic acids employing a mixed ligand system consist-
ing of chiral monodentate phosphoramidites and achiral phos-
phines, in which up to 91% ee was obtained. Qiu et al. have
developed highly enantioselective catalytic hydrogenation of
R-aminomethylacrylates containing a free basic NH group using
the Rh/Et-DuPHOS complex as a catalyst, in which 99% ee
and high isolated yields (>98%) were obtained even in low
catalyst loadings.9d In our recent study,10 we have found that
the D-mannitol derived monodentate phosphite ligand, Man-
niPhos, was highly effective for the rhodium-catalyzed asym-
metric hydrogenation of â-unsubstituted R-(phthalimidomethyl)-
acrylates. However, the results for the â-substituted substrates
are unsatisfactory. Incomplete conversions and moderate enan-
tioselectivities were obtained in most cases even under high H2
pressure (85 atm) and high catalyst loadings (4 mol %) for 36
h. Therefore, the search of the new catalytic system, which could
induce excellent enantioselectivity under lower catalyst loadings
and milder reaction conditions in this Rh-catalyzed transforma-
tion, was undertaken. Very recently, we have developed a highly
enantioselective synthesis of γ-amino acid derivatives via the
Enantioselective Synthesis of â2-Amino Acids via
Rh-Catalyzed Asymmetric Hydrogenation with
BoPhoz-Type Ligands: Important Influence of an
N-H Proton in the Ligand on the
Enantioselectivity
Jun Deng,†,‡ Xiang-Ping Hu,*,† Jia-Di Huang,†,‡
Sai-Bo Yu,†,‡ Dao-Yong Wang,†,‡ Zheng-Chao Duan,†,‡ and
Zhuo Zheng*,†
Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Dalian 116023, China, and Graduate School of
Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China
zhengz@dicp.ac.cn; xiangping@dicp.ac.cn
ReceiVed NoVember 21, 2007
A series of BoPhoz-type ligands were successfully applied
in the rhodium-catalyzed asymmetric hydrogenation of a
number of â-substituted or unsubstituted R-(phthalimidom-
ethyl)acrylates, affording good to excellent enantioselectivi-
ties. The results suggested that the presence of an N-H
proton in the BoPhoz backbone could significantly improve
the enantioselectivity, and ligand (Sc,Rp)-1d, bearing two CF3-
groups in the 3,5-position of the phenyl ring of aminophos-
phino moiety, showed the highest enantioselectivity.
Chiral â-amino acids and derivatives are important building
blocks in the synthesis of natural products, â-peptides, and
pharmaceuticals.1 Therefore, an enantioselective method for the
synthesis of these compounds is highly desirable. Although
several enantioselective catalytic methods have been developed
recently for the synthesis of â-substituted â-amino acids (â3-
amino acids),2 there are significantly fewer reports on enanti-
oselective methods for the synthesis of R-substituted â-amino
acids (â2-amino acids).1a,3 The present methods for the catalytic
synthesis of chiral â2-amino acids included Pd-catalyzed allylic
(4) (a) Bower, J. F.; Williams, J. M. J. Synlett, 1996, 685-686. (b) Bower,
J. F.; Jumnah, R.; Williams, A. C.; Williams, J. M. J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1997, 1411-1420.
(5) Davies, H. M. L.; Venkataramani, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002,
41, 2197-2199.
(6) (a) Duursma, A.; Minnaard, A. J.; Feringa, B. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2003, 125, 3700-3701. (b) Eilitz, U.; Lessmann, F.; Seidelmann, O.;
Wendisch, V. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2003, 14, 189-191. (c) Eilitz, U.;
Lessmann, F.; Seidelmann, O.; Wendisch, V. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2003,
14, 3095-3097. (d) Rimkus, A.; Sewald, N. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 79-80.
(7) Sibi, M. P.; Tatamidani, H.; Patil, K. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 2571-2573.
(8) Sibi, M. P.; Patil, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1235-1238.
(9) (a) Saylik, D.; Campi, E. M.; Donohue, A. C.; Jackson, W. R.;
Robinson, A. J. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2001, 12, 657-667. (b) Elaridi,
J.; Thaqi, A.; Prosser, A.; Jackson, W. R.; Robinson, A. J. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 2005, 16, 1309-1319. (c) Hoen, R.; Tiemersma-Wegman, T.;
Procuranti, B.; Lefort, L.; de Vries, J. G.; Minnaard, A. J.; Feringa, B. L.
Org. Biomol. Chem. 2007, 5, 267-275. (d) Qiu, L.; Prashad, M.; Hu, B.;
Prasad, K.; Repic, O.; Blacklock, T. J.; Kwong, F. Y.; Kok, S. H. L.; Lee,
H. W.; Chan, A. S. C. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104, 16787-
16792.
† Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
‡ Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Science.
(1) (a) EnantioselectiVe Synthesis of â-Amino Acids; Juaristi, E., Ed.;
Wiley-VCH: New York, 1997. (b) Abele, S.; Seebach, D. Eur. J. Org.
Chem. 2000, 1-15. (c) Cheng, R. P.; Gellman, S. H.; DeGrado, W. F. Chem.
ReV. 2001, 101, 3219-3232. (d) Nussbaum, F. V.; Spiteller, P. In Highlights
in Bioorganic Chemistry; Schmuck, C., Wennemers, H., Eds.; Wiley-
VCH: Weinheim, Germany 2003; p 63.
(2) Drexler, H.-J.; You, J.; Zhang, S.; Fisher, C.; Baumann, W.;
Spannenberg, A.; Heller, D. Org. Process Res. DeV. 2003, 7, 355-361.
(3) Liu, M.; Sibi, M. P. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 7991-8035.
(10) Huang, H.; Liu, X.; Deng, J.; Qiu, M.; Zheng, Z. Org. Lett. 2006,
8, 3359-3362.
10.1021/jo702510m CCC: $40.75 © 2008 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 01/30/2008
J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 2015-2017
2015