J . Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 8273-8276
8273
Several solid- and solution-phase approaches for the
synthesis of purine analogues have been reported in the
literature over the past 5 years.4 One limitation of these
approaches is that one substituent is held invariant in
order to anchor the purine ring to the solid phase
(Scheme 1). To avoid this limitation, a “traceless” strategy
was desired that would be compatible with production-
scale library synthesis in spatially separate or divide-
recombine formats.
A Con cise a n d Tr a celess Lin k er Str a tegy
tow a r d Com bin a tor ia l Libr a r ies of
2,6,9-Su bstitu ted P u r in es
Sheng Ding,† Nathanael S. Gray,*,‡,§ Qiang Ding,‡ and
Peter G. Schultz*,†,‡
Department of Chemistry and the Skaggs Institute for
Chemical Biology, The Scripps Research Institute,
10550 North Torrey Pines Road, La J olla, California 92037,
and Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research
Foundation, 3115 Merryfield Row,
Another limitation of previous synthetic approaches4g
is the low reactivity of the 2-fluoro group once an amino
substituent has been installed at C6. For example,
complete displacement at C2 of a 2-fluoro-6-benzylami-
nopurine in solution requires heating at over 100 °C for
12 h using n-butanol as solvent. Complete aromatic
substitution of 2-fluoro or 2-chloro purine compounds on
solid support requires even higher temperatures and
often results in significant side reactions. This limits the
range of functional groups that can be installed at C2
and also creates difficulties in library production.
San Diego, California 92121
schultz@scripps.edu
Received August 6, 2001
In tr od u ction
Despite concerns that it would be extremely difficult
to design specific ATP competitive inhibitors of kinases,
there have been a number of success stories including
the p38 Map kinase, tyrosine kinases, and cyclin-depend-
ent kinases.1,3 Selective inhibitors of each of these kinases
are in various stages of clinical testing. The ability to
discriminate between extremely homologous kinases such
as CDK1 vs CDK2 has been demonstrated by the
development of novel thioflavopiridol derivatives that
display enhanced selectivity for CDK1 relative to CDK2.2
To date, a variety of heterocyclic scaffolds including
pyrimidines, indolines, pyrrolopyrimidines, indirubins,
purines, quinazolines, trisubstituted imidazoles, pyra-
zolopyrimidines, flavones, and anilinoquinolines have
been developed as kinase inhibitors.1,3 As each scaffold
presents unique opportunities for the presentation of
functional groups to the kinase active site, there is a need
for efficient and flexible methods for preparing libraries
of each of these inhibitor classes. We have chosen to focus
our development efforts toward the purine nucleus for
several reasons: (1) solid-phase and solution-phase pu-
rine chemistries have been sufficiently explored such that
unified schemes toward the derivatization of the 2-, 6-,
7-, 8-, and 9-positions4 should be possible; (2) purines
have been demonstrated to provide high-affinity ligands
for a variety of proteins; and (3) solid-phase methods used
to prepare purine libraries such as resin capture, nu-
cleophilic aromatic substitution reactions, Mitsunobu
alkylations, and palladium coupling reactions are readily
generalized to other heterocyclic systems of interest.
Resu lts a n d Discu ssion
We found that 6-amino-2-fluoro-9-alkylpurines react
with primary amines in methanol at room temperature.
With slightly more forcing conditions (in refluxing metha-
nol), sterically hindered amines such as the R-amino
group of arginine can be successfully introduced at the
C2-position (Scheme 2) with good yields. Unfortunately,
these conditions failed to translate to solid support,
presumably due to resin swelling problems in methanol.
Despite testing a range of solvent systems (NMP, DMF,
dioxane, DMSO, THF, and their combinations such as
DMFV/MeOHV 1/1), no solvent was found that allowed
complete substitution below 100 °C.
One possible solution to this problem involves C2
substition prior to substitution at C6. This requires
reversing the natural reactivity which favors initial
substitution at C6. We found that a C6 sulfenylpurine,
such as 2-fluoro-6-phenylsulfenyl (or a 6-benzylsulfenyl)
purine, directs quantitative and selective substitution by
an amine to the C2-position at 80 °C (Scheme 3). To
develop this as a combinatorial scheme, we envisioned
that we could subsequently substitute C6 after oxidation
of the thioether to the sulfone as has been demonstrated
in the synthesis of 2,4-diaminopyrimidine.5 The 2-fluoro-
6-thiophenylpurine was easily prepared by reacting
excess thiophenol with 2-fluoro-6-chloropurine in metha-
nol at 0 °C and then purifying by recrystallization.
We have previously demonstrated that the N9-position
can be alkylated on solid support under Mitsunobu
† The Scripps Research Institute.
‡ Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation.
(4) For 2-, 6-, 8-, or 9-substituted purine analogues, please see the
following. (a) Gray, N. S.; Wodicka, L.; Thunnissen, A.-M. W. H.;
Norman, T. C.; Kwon, S.; Espinoza, F. H.; Morgan, D. O.; Barnes, G.;
LeClerc, S.; Meijer, L.; Kim, S.-H.; Lockhart, D. J .; Schultz, P. G.
Science 1998, 281, 533. (b) Chang, Y.-T.; Gray, N. S.; Chang, Rosania,
G. R.; Sutherlin, D. P. Kwon, S.; Norman, T. C.; Sarohia, R.; Leost,
M.; Meijer, L.; Schultz, P. G. Chem. Biol. 1999, 6, 361. (c) Lucrezia, R.
D.; Gilbert, I. H.; Floyd, C. D. J . Comb. Chem. 2000, 2, 249. (d) Nolsoe,
J . M. J .; Gundersen, L.-L.; Rise, F. Synth. Commun. 1998, 28, 4303.
For 7-substituted purine analogues, please see the following. (e) Dalby,
C.; Bleasdale, C.; Clegg, W.; Elsegood, M. R. J .; Golding, B. T. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32, 1696. (f) Zaitseva, G. V.; Sivets, G. G.;
Kazimierczuk, Z.; Vilpo, J . A.; Mikhailopulo, I. A. Bioorg. Med. Lett.
1995, 5, 2999. (g) Dorff, P. H.; Garigipati, R. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001,
42, 2771.
§ E-mail: gray@gnf.org.
(1) (a) McMahon, G.; Sun, L.; Liang, C.; Tang, C. Curr. Opin. Drug
Discovery Dev. 1998, 1, 131. (b) Adams, J . L.; Lee, D. Curr. Opin. Drug
Discovery Dev. 1999, 2, 96. (c) Cohen, P. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1999,
3, 459. (d) Garcia-Echeverria, C.; Traxler, P.; Evans, D. B. Med. Res.
Rev. 2000, 20, 28 and references therein.
(2) Kim, K. S.; Sack, J . S.; Tokarski, J . S.; Qian, L.; Chao, S. T.;
Leith, L.; Kelly, Y. F.; Misra, R. N.; Hunt, J . T.; Kimball S. D.;
Humphreys, W. G.; Wautlet, B. S.; Mulheron, J . G.; Webster, K. R. J .
Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 4126.
(3) (a) Druker, B. J .; Tamura, S.; Buchdunger, E.; Ohno, S.; Segal,
G. M.; Fanning, S., Zimmermann, J .; Lydon, N. B. Nature Med. 1996,
2, 561 (b) Taylor, S. S.; Radzio-Andzelm, E. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.
1997, 1, 2219 (c) Schindler, T.; Bornmann, W.; Pellicena, P.; Miller,
W. T.; Clarkson, B.; Kuriyan, J . Science 2000, 289, 1938.
(5) Gayo, L. M.; Suto, M. J . Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 211.
10.1021/jo016010f CCC: $20.00 © 2001 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 10/31/2001