A. Catalano et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 123 (2016) 649e664
661
4.1.1.18. (RS)-Ethyl 2-(2,6-dimethylphenoxy)propanoate (RS)-59.
Sodium (0.38 g, 16.5 mmol) was added in small pieces to absolute
EtOH (30 mL) and the mixture was heated at 70 ꢀC. After comple-
tion of sodium dissolution, a solution of 2,6-dimethylphenol (2.0 g,
16.5 mmol) in absolute EtOH (15 mL) was added dropwise. After
30 min, a solution of (RS)-ethyl 2-bromopropanoate [(RS)-57]
(2.98 g, 16.5 mmol) in absolute EtOH (15 mL) was added dropwise
and the mixture was heated at reflux for 5 h. The solid residue was
filtered off, the solvent was evaporated in vacuum and the residue
was taken up with diethyl ether, washed with 2 N NaOH and dried
(Na2SO4). Removal of the solvent under vacuum gave 3.11 g (85%) of
4.1.1.23. (R)-2-(2,6-Dimethylphenoxy)propan-1-ol
(R)-61.
Prepared as reported above for (RS)-61 starting from (R)-60. Yield:
20
62%; colorless oil: [
a
]
D
¼ ꢁ9.1 (c 2.1, CHCl3). Spectroscopic data
were in agreement with the (S)-isomer.
4.1.1.24. 2-{[2'-[1-(trimethylstannyl)-1H-tetrazol-5-yl]biphenyl-4-yl}
methyl]-1H-isoindole-1,3(2H)-dione 62. A solution of compound 18
(1.50 g, 4.44 mmol) in dry toluene (75 mL) and azidotrimethyltin
(1.0 g, 4.89 mmol) was kept at 110 ꢀC under nitrogen atmosphere
for 24 h. The precipitate was filtered off and washed with hot
toluene to give compound 62 as a white solid (0.90 mg, 37%):
mp > 250 ꢀC; IR (KBr): 1763,1709 (C]O), 550 (SneN) cmꢁ1;1H NMR
(RS)-59 as a yellow oil: IR (neat): 1737 (C]O) cmꢁ1
(CDCl3):
;
1H NMR
d
1.28 (t, 3H, J ¼ 7.1 Hz, CH3CH2), 1.53 (d, 3H, J ¼ 6.6 Hz,
(DMSO-d6): d 0.32 (br s, 9H, (CH3)3Sn), 4.71 (s, 2H, CH2), 6.98 (d,
CH3CH), 2.28 (s, 6H, CH3Ar), 4.23 (q, 2H, J ¼ 7.1 Hz, CH2), 4.49 (q, 1H,
J ¼ 8.2 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.16 (d, J ¼ 9.3 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.35e7.55 (m, 4H, Ar),
J ¼ 6.6 Hz, CH), 6.86e6.94 (m, 1H, Ar), 6.95e7.03 (m, 2H, Ar); 13C
7.75e7.95 (m, 4H, Ar); LC-MS m/z (%) 568 [Mþ þ 23].
NMR (CDCl3):
d 14.4 (1C), 17.2 (2C), 18.7 (1C), 61.3 (1C), 77.1 (1C),
124.2 (1C), 129.3 (2C), 131.1 (2C), 154.8 (1C), 172.3 (1C); GC/MS
4.1.1.25. 4,5,6,7-Tetrachloro-2-(3-hydroxypropyl)-1H-isoindole-
1,3(2H)-dione 65. Prepared as reported above for (R)-33, starting
from 3-aminopropanol and tetrachlorophthalic anhydride.
Yield:32%; mp193e194 ꢀC (EtOAc/hexane); IR (KBr): 3319 (OH),
(70 eV) m/z (%) 222 (Mþ, 91), 149 (100).
4.1.1.19. (R)-Methyl 2-(2,6-dimethylphenoxy)propanoate (R)-60.
Prepared as reported above for (RS)-8 starting from 2,6-
1774, 1707 (C]O) cmꢁ1 1H NMR (CDCl3):
; d 1.85e1.92 (m, 2H,
CH2CH2CH2),1.98 (br s,1H, OH),3.64 (t, J ¼ 5.8 Hz, 2H, CH2N), 3.86 (t,
dimethylphenol and ethyl (S)-(ꢁ)-lactate [(S)-58]. Yield: 72%;
J ¼ 6.3 Hz, 2H, CH2O); 13C NMR (CDCl3):
d 31.1 (1C), 35.7 (1C), 59.5
20
slightly yellowish oil:[
a]
D
¼ þ40 (c 2.1, CHCl3). Spectroscopic data
(1C),127.7 (2C), 129.9 (2C),140.4 (2C); 164.2 (2C); GC/MS(70 eV) m/z
(%) 343 (Mþ, 24), 298 (100). Anal. calcd for C11H17Cl4NO3.H2O %: C,
36.60; H 2.51; N 3.88. Found: C, 36.53; H 2.11; N 3.86.
were in agreement with the (S)-isomer.
4.1.1.20. (S)-Methyl 2-(2,6-dimethylphenoxy)propanoate (S)-60.
Prepared as reported above for (RS)-8 starting from 2,6-
4.1.1.26. 3-(Phenylsulfanyl)propan-1-ol
67. K2CO3
(0.32
g,
dimethylphenol and methyl (R)-(þ)-lactate [(R)-58]. Yield: 37%;
2.32 mmol) was added to a solution of 3-bromopropanol (0.29 g,
2.11 mmol) in dry DMF (30 mL) under N2 atmosphere. The reaction
mixture was heated at 130 ꢀC and then a solution of thiophenol
(0.26 g, 2.32 mmol) in 20 mL of dry DMF was added dropwise
during a period of 3 h. The mixture was stirred at this temperature
for 24 h. After evaporation of the solvent, the residue was taken up
with EtOAc, washed with 2 N NaOH, and then with brine. The
organic phase was dried (Na2SO4) and concentrated under vacuum.
The residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel
(EtOAc/petroleum ether 2:8) to give 0.36 g (69%) of a yellow oil; IR
20
slightly yellowish oil: [
a]
¼ ꢁ39 (c 2.1, CHCl3); IR (neat): 1759 (C]
D
O) cmꢁ1; 1H NMR (CDCl3):
6H, CH3Ar), 3.78 (s, 3H, CH3O), 4.51 (q, J ¼ 6.9 Hz,1H, CH), 6.88e7.04
(m, 3H, Ar); 13C NMR (CDCl3):
17.2 (2C), 18.7 (1C), 52.3 (1C), 77.0
d
1.53 (d, J ¼ 6.9 Hz, 3H, CH3CH), 2.27 (s,
d
(1C), 124.2 (1C), 129.3 (2C), 131.1 (2C), 154.7 (1C), 172.7 (1C); GC-MS
(70 eV) m/z (%) 208 (Mþ, 1), 122 (100).
4.1.1.21. (RS)-2-(2,6-dimethylphenoxy)propan-1-ol (RS)-61. To
a
suspension of LiAlH4 (1.28 g, 33.7 mmol) in dry THF (60 mL), a
solution of (RS)-59 (3.74 g, 16.9 mmol) in dry THF (60 mL) under N2
atmosphere was added. The mixture was stirred under moderate
reflux for 1 h and then at room temperature for 24 h. The reaction
was quenched by the careful addition of cold water until the end of
gas evolution. The residue was removed by filtration and the filtrate
shaken with H2O. The aqueous phase was extracted several times
with Et2O. The combined extracts were dried over Na2SO4 and the
filtrate was concentrated under vacuum. Purification by flash
chromatography (EtOAc/petroleum ether 1:9) gave 1.85 g (61%) of
(neat): 3356 (OH) cmꢁ1 1H NMR (CDCl3):
; d1.83e1.92 (m, 3H,
CH2CH2CH2 þ OH), 3.03 (t, J ¼ 7.15 Hz, 2H, CH2SAr), 3.75 (t,
J ¼ 6.1 Hz, 2H, CH2OH), 7.14e7.36 (m, 5H, ArS); 13C NMR (CDCl3):
d
30.5 (1C), 31.9 (1C), 61.6 (1C), 126.2 (1C), 129.1 (2C), 129.4 (2C),
136.5 (1C); GC/MS (70 eV) m/z (%) 168 (Mþ, 10), 110 (100).
4.2. Enzymology
The compounds were screened for their activity and their
species-specificity against EcTS, EfTS, and hTS. EcTS, and hTS were
purified as described [8]. EfTS [14] was purified following the pro-
cedure used for EcTS. Enzyme kinetics experiments were con-
ducted by chromogenic assay under standard conditions [8,14]. The
Km values, by curve-fitting to hyperbolic curves, of EcTS, EfTS, and
(RS)-61 as a colorless oil: IR (neat): 3416 (OH) cmꢁ1
;
1H NMR
(CDCl3):
d
1.17 (d, J ¼ 6.3 Hz, 3H, CH3CH), 2.28 (s, 7H, CH3Ar þ OH),
3.68e3.84 (m, 2H, CH2), 4.18e4.30 (m, 1H, CH), 6.87e6.95 (m, 1H,
Ar), 7.01 (d, J ¼ 3.8 Hz, 2H, Ar); 13C NMR (CDCl3):
d 16.4 (1C), 17.4
(2C), 67.1 (1C), 78.1 (1C), 123.8 (1C), 129.3 (2C), 131.4 (2C), 154.0
hTS for MTHF were, respectively, 5.8
mM, 13.6 mM, and 6.9 mM.
(1C); GC/MS (70 eV) m/z (%) 180 (Mþ, 37), 122 (100).
These data represent the mean of triplicate measurements; in a
typical study, the standard deviation of the data fell within 20% of
the mean. The apparent inhibition constant (Ki app, simply defined
as Ki within the text) values were obtained from the linear least-
squares fit of the residual activity as a function of inhibitor con-
centration, assuming a competitive inhibition [8]. In the inhibition
assays, the reaction mixture was the same as in the TS standard
assay. Stock solutions of each inhibitor were freshly prepared in
dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and stored at e 80 ꢀC. In the reaction
mixture, the concentration of DMSO never exceeded 5%. Each
experiment was repeated at least three times and an individual
measurement did not differ more than 20% from the mean.
4.1.1.22. (S)-2-(2,6-Dimethylphenoxy)propan-1-ol
(S)-61.
Prepared as reported above for (RS)-61 starting from (S)-60. Yield:
20
66%; colorless oil: [
a]
¼ þ9.0 (c 2.1, CHCl3); IR (neat): 3401 (OH)
D
cmꢁ1;1H NMR (CDCl3):
overlapping s at 2.28 ppm, exch. D2O, 1H, OH), 2.28 (s overlapping
br s at 2.21 ppm, 6H, CH3Ar), 3.68e3.84 (m, 2H, CH2), 4.18e4.29 (m,
1H, CH), 6.88e6.96 (m, 1H, Ar), 6.97e7.05 (m, 2H, Ar); 13C NMR
d
1.17 (d, J ¼ 6.3 Hz, 3H, CH3CH), 2.21 (br s
(CDCl3):d 16.4 (2C), 17.4 (1C), 67.1 (1C), 78.0 (1C), 123.8 (1C), 129.3
(2C), 131.4 (2C), 154.0 (1C); GC/MS (70 eV) m/z (%) 180 (Mþ, 26), 122
(100).