Acylthioketene-Thioacylketene-Thiet-2-one Rearrangements
J . Org. Chem., Vol. 65, No. 9, 2000 2709
a ,b
Ta ble 2. Ca lcu la ted Rela tive En er gies of Th iet-2-on e 12a a n d Th ioa cylk eten e Z11a (k J m ol-1
)
level
relative energy
level
B3LYP/6-31G*
B3LYP/6-311G**
B3LYP/6-311+G**
B3LYP/cc-pVDZ
relative energy
HF/6-31G*
MP2/6-31G*
MP3/6-31G*
17.3
2.3
-5.9
3.2
1.9
11.4
5.2
MP4SDQ/6-31G*
2.7
QCISD/6-31G*
3.1
B3LYP/cc-pVTZ
1.6
QCISD(T)/6-31G*
-0.9
-1.5
-0.7
B3LYP/6-311+G(3df,2p)
B3LYP/6-311+G(3df,2p) (ꢀ ) 40)
B3LYP/6-311+G(3df,2p)d (ꢀ ) 40)
1.6
-4.8
-4.0
QCISD(T)/6-311+G(3df,2p)c
QCISD(T)/6-311+G(3df,2p)c,d
a
b
Based on the B3LYP/6-31G* optimized geometry. 4.184 kJ mol-1 ) 1 kcal mol-1
.
c Estimated using basis-set additivity at the MP2
d
level. Including zero point energy correction (B3LYP/6-31G*).
competes with the simple cleavage to m/z 105, i.e., two
different species with a mass of 162 are now present. At
800 °C the second isomer has become dominant. This
isomer is identified as the thiet-2-one 12a because of its
ready extrusion of CO to give m/z 134 in accord with the
IR observations above. The CAMS in Figure 3c is similar
to that of PhCHdCdS (13a ) itself3 below m/z 100. This
interpretation is also supported by the MIKE spectra: as
mentioned above, the CA spectrum of the “cold” m/z 162
species derived from 9a at 170 °C features essentially
only m/z 105 (simple cleavage). The MIKE spectrum
under the same conditions features a ca. 4:1 ratio of m/z
105 and m/z 134, indicating that the latter is formed in
a rearrangement process.
by ca. 13 kJ mol-1 (Table 1). For both 10 and 11, the s-Z
conformation is the preferred conformer, but the E/ Z
energy differences are small.
We have shown previously that 1,3-shifts in acylketenes
and related molecules are facile processes when the
migrating group possesses an unshared pair of electrons
capable of overlap with the vacant central carbon p
orbital of the ketene LUMO.6,7 1,3-Alkyl migrations in
contrast have very high calculated barriers and have not
been observed. The observed 1,3-phenyl migration in
benzoylketene4 has a calculated barrier of 147 kJ mol-1
(35 kcal mol-1). The rearrangement of acylthioketene
E10a to thioacylketene E11a via a 1,3-phenyl shift is
likewise calculated to have a barrier of 148 kJ mol-1 (35
kcal mol-1). The migratory aptitude of a phenyl group
can be rationalized in terms of the availability of the
HOMO (π orbital) in the rotated phenyl group as an
electron donor. E10b is expected to have a lower 1,3-shift
barrier because of the increased electron-donating ability
of the migrating group. Indeed, the calculated barrier is
130 kJ mol-1 (31 kcal mol-1) in agreement with the
experimental observation that 1,3-migration in 10b oc-
curred at a lower FVT temperature than for 10a .
Thiet-2-one (12) and s-Z-thioacylketene (Z11) are
predicted to lie very close in energy. At the B3LYP/6-
311+G** + ZPVE level, 12 is slightly higher in energy,
but the relative energies are rather sensitive to the basis
set and the level of correlation treatment employed (Table
2). The HF treatment and moderate-sized basis sets
strongly favor the open form Z11, but the cyclic structure
is stabilized at higher levels of theory. Thus 12a is
preferred over Z11a by ca. 1 kJ mol-1 at the QCISD(T)/
6-31G* level. At our best level of theory, QCISD(T)/
6-311+G(3df,2p) + ZPVE, 12a is more stable than Z11a
by ca. 1.5 kJ mol-1 (Table 3). Thiet-2-ones are polar
molecules (µ ) 5.12 and 6.52 D for 12a and 12b,
respectively). Thus, the thiet-2-one/acylthioketene equi-
librium will be shifted toward the cyclic structure in the
presence of a polar environment. In a dielectric medium
of ꢀ ) 40, 12a is predicted to be more stable than Z11a
by 4 kJ mol-1, using Onsager’s SCRF model.12 The barrier
toward ring closure (Z11 f 12) is of the order of 8-11
kJ mol-1 (2-3 kcal mol-1) (Table 1). Thus, calculations
agree with the experimentally observed preference for
the thiet-2-ones in matrixes. As we have noted before,
molecules experience polar effects even in Ar matrixes,
which cannot be regarded simply as the frozen gas
phase.13
The structures of the ions assigned as PhCHdCdS,
PhCCH, and OCS (m/z 60) were confirmed by CAMS of
the mass-selected ions and comparison with those of
authentic samples and are reported in the Supporting
Information.
The anisyl derivative 9b behaved in a similar manner,
and the ions were identified as described above. The
essential spectra are shown in the Supporting Informa-
tion. Here too, the thioketene (10b) is characterized by
simple cleavage (m/z 192 f 135, prominent at 300-400
°C). As in the IR investigation, rearrangement occurred
at lower temperature in this case, the thiet-2-one being
dominant already at ca. 500 °C (characterized by m/z 192
f 164). The structures of the ions corresponding to 13b,
14b and OCS were confirmed by their CA mass spectra.
3. Th eor y. Structures and IR spectra of 10, 11, and
12 (a and b series) and related transition structures
were calculated at the B3LYP/6-31G* level,9 using the
Gaussian 98 programs.10 IR spectra for the a series were
also calculated at the B3LYP/6-311+G* level. The com-
puted IR spectral data and Cartesian coordinates are
given in the Supporting Information. Improved relative
energies were obtained through B3LYP/6-311+G** cal-
culations, including B3LYP/6-31G* zero-point energy
correction (scaled by 0.9804).11 The thioacylketenes (11)
are predicted to be more stable than acylthioketenes (10),
(9) (a) Becke, A. D. J . Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648. (b) Lee, C.; Yang,
W.; Parr, R. G. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785.
(10) Frisch, M. J .; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.;
Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J . R.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Montgomery, J . A.,
J r.; Stratmann, R. E.; Burant, J . C.; Dapprich, S.; Millam, J . M.;
Daniels, A. D.; Kudin, K. N.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Tomasi, J .;
Barone, V.; Cossi, M.; Cammi, R.; Mennucci, B.; Pomelli, C.; Adamo,
C.; Clifford, S.; Ochterski, J .; Petersson, G. A.; Ayala, P. Y.; Cui, Q.;
Morokuma, K.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.;
Foresman, J . B.; Cioslowski, J .; Ortiz, J . V.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.;
Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Gomperts, R.; Martin, R. L.;
Fox, D. J .; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.;
Gonzalez, C.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; J ohnson, B.; Chen, W.;
Wong, M. W.; Andres, J . L.; Gonzalez, C.; Head-Gordon, M.; Replogle,
E. S.; Pople, J . A. Gaussian 98; Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
(11) Wong, M. W. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1996, 256, 391.
(12) (a) Wong, M. W.; Frisch, M. J .; Wiberg, K. B. J . Am. Chem.
Soc. 1991, 113, 4776. (b) Wong, M. W.; Wiberg, K. B.; Frisch, M. J . J .
Chem. Phys. 1991, 89, 8991.
(13) Ye, X.; Andraos, J .; Bibas, H.; Wong, M. W.; Wentrup C. J .
Chem. Soc., Perkin Ttrans. 1 2000, 401.