A. Smelcerovic et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 985 (2011) 397–402
401
3.2. Isolation, identification and fermentation of the fungi
ane. The reaction mixture was heated for 40 min at 80 °C, then
cooled down and diluted with 15 ml of tetrachloromethane.
23.9 g (0.12 mol) of N-bromosuccinimide and 15 drops of 40%
aqueous solution of HBr were applied. After 10 min of heating at
70 °C, and 90 min at 85 °C, the solvent and the excess of SOCl2 were
removed under reduced pressure. The residue was suction filtered,
the solid was washed several times with tetrachloromethane and
the solvent was removed from the combined filtrate as before.
The obtained 2-bromo-3-methylbutanoyl chloride was used in
the next step of the reaction without further purification.
(4): GC–MS (4 min), m/z: 201, 199, 197 (M+); IR (CCl4, 0.61 mm
CaF2 cell), cmÀ1: 2972, 2939, 2871, 1794, 1559, 1464, 1391, 1373,
1225, 1191, 1127; 1H NMR (250 MHz; CDCl3): 1.92 s, 6 H (2CH3);
2.26–2.36 m, 1 H (CH); 4.30–4.33 d, 1 H, J = 7.2 (CH); 13C NMR
(250 MHz; CDCl3): 19.9, 20.1 (2 CH3), 30.6 (CH), 62.3 (CH), 173.5
(CO).
The isolation of the endophytic fungi was carried out following
the method of Strobel et al. [15]. Briefly, in the laboratory, fresh
plant materials were thoroughly surface treated with 70% ethanol.
The stems were used for the isolation of endophytic fungi. Then,
with a sterile knife blade, outer tissues were removed from the
samples and the inner tissues carefully excised and placed on the
water agar plates (WA; DIFCO, Cat. No. 214530). After 8 days of
incubation at 28 2 °C hyphal tips of the fungi were removed
and transported to potato dextrose agar (PDA; DIFCO, Cat. No.
213400). The pure cultures, thus obtained, were preserved by cryo-
preservation at 70 °C. Fungus used in the present study was iden-
tified as F. sporotrichioides Sherb. [W&R,G,B,J] according to the
protocol of Nelson et al. [35]. Shake flask fermentation was carried
out for a period of 5 days at 28 °C. After fermentation mycelium
and broth were separated by centrifugation.
6-(Propan-2-yl)-4-methyl-morpholine-2,5-diones: 0.006 mol of
N-methylamino acid was suspended in 15 ml dry chloroform
cooled in ice, and 0.003 mol of 2-bromoisovaleryl chloride was
added. The mixture was stirred for 1 h, and then the temperature
was allowed to rise to 20 °C. The chloroform was removed under
reduced pressure, the residue was dissolved in 20 ml ether and
the solution was filtered to remove the solid. The filtrate was ex-
tracted with 30 ml of 0.5 M aqueous solution of potassium carbon-
ate (three portions of 10 ml) and washed with water (10 ml). The
combined alkaline solution was immediately acidified with HCl
(pH ꢀ 2) and twice re-extracted with 30 ml ether (three portions
of 10 ml). The combined ether layers from the re-extraction were
dried over sodium sulfate and the solvent was removed under re-
duced pressure. The evaporation yielded small amount of light yel-
low oil which crystallized on being kept. The residual crude
material was purified by column chromatography (d = 1 cm;
l = 7 cm) on silica gel eluting with mixture of cyclohexane and
ethyl acetate (1:1) to afford the pure title compound. After recrys-
tallization in mixture of diethyl ether and petroleum ether colour-
less crystals as needles were obtained;
3.3. GC–MS analysis
GC–MS analyses of the broth and mycelium ethyl acetate ex-
tracts were performed on a Thermo Finnigan Trace Gas Chromato-
graph and Trace MSPLUS detector, equipped with a fused silica
column (DB-5 30 m  0.25 mm  0.25
lm); carrier gas helium
(1 ml/min). The operating conditions were: temperature program,
60–320 °C at 10 °C/min and 320 °C (4 min); injector temperature,
310 °C; detector temperature, 320 °C. Ionization was performed
at 70 eV.
3.4. Mycotoxin analysis
The analysis of mycotoxins from ethyl acetate extracts of the
broth and mycelium was performed using a LC–MS/MS multi-
method. The detailed procedure has been reported earlier [18,19]
and is briefly described in this work. A Thermo-Finnigan Surveyor
HPLC system was interfaced to the mass spectrometer for auto-
mated LC–MS and LC–MS/MS analyses. The Surveyor HPLC system
included a quaternary, low-pressure mixing pump with vacuum
degassing, an autosampler with temperature-controlled tray
(10 °C), a column oven (25 °C). A C18(2) Luna Phenomenex column
3,6-Di(propan-2-yl)-4-methyl-morpholine-2,5-dione (1a): C11H19
NO3, M = 213.27; yield = 35%; RI (retention index) 1558; MS
[60–500 m/z]: 213 (M+), 171, 142, 100, 83, 71, 69; IR (KBr), cmÀ1
:
2969, 2938, 2876, 1737, 1622, 1489, 1471, 1420, 1389, 1371,
1355, 1314, 1281, 1259, 1209, 1139, 1121, 1105, 1001, 977, 930,
861, 847, 770, 752, 661, 636, 548; 1H NMR (600 MHz; CDCl3):
0.91–0.94 m, 3 H (CH3); 0.97–1.01 m, 3 H (CH3); 1.07–1.12 m, 3
H (CH3); 1.17–1.19 dd, 3 H, J = 3.5, 3.6 (CH3); 2.09–2.11 t, 1 H,
J = 5.1, 4.8 (CH); 2.39–2.42 m, 1 H (CH); 3.10 s, 3 H (N–CH3);
4.17–4.18 d, 1 H, J = 9.5 (CH); 4.85–4.86 d, 1 H, J = 10.4 (CH); 13C
NMR (600 MHz; CDCl3): 18.8, 19.1, 20.1, 21.1 (4 CH3), 27.9 (CH),
29.7 (CH), 31.9 (N–CH3), 64.4 (CH), 70.0 (CH), 170.5 (COO), 171.4
(CON).
3-(2-Methylpropyl)-6-(propan-2-yl)-4-methyl-morpholine-2,5-
dione (1b): C12H21NO3; M = 227.30; yield = 32%; RI 1631; MS [60–
500 m/z]: 227 (M+), 185, 170, 142, 129, 112, 100, 83, 69; IR (film),
cmÀ1: 2964, 2934, 2874, 1730, 1645, 1472, 1410, 1388, 1370, 1323,
1258, 1187, 1135, 1097, 1058, 928, 851, 651; 1H NMR (600 MHz;
CDCl3): 0.90–0.99 m, 6 H (2CH3); 1.06–1.17 m, 6 H (2CH3); 1.79–
1.80 m, 1 H (CH); 2.08–2.10 m, 2 H (CH2); 2.36–2.42 m, 1 H
(CH); 3.03 s, 3H (N–CH3); 4.18–4.20 d, 1 H, J = 9.6 (CH); 5.36–
5.39 dd, 1 H, J = 7.1, 6.7 (CH); 13C NMR (600 MHz; CDCl3): 19.7,
20.1, 20.9, 21.3 (4CH3), 23.5 (CH), 24.8 (CH), 31.8 (N–CH3), 36.8
(CH2), 51.0 (CH), 69.5 (CH), 170.1 (COO), 176.2 (CON).
(150 mm  2 mm  3
column held at 25 °C was used with a solvent flow rate of 0.2 ml/
min and an injection volume of 10 l. The mobile phase for ESI-
lm) attached to a Phenomenex C18 Guard
l
pos consisted of eluent A containing methanol/water/acetic acid
(97:2:1 v/v/v), and eluent C consisting of methanol/water/acetic
acid (10:89:1 v/v/v) containing 10 mM ammonium acetate. The
chromatographic conditions were as follows: 0–2 min, 10% A; 2–
5 min, 10–60% A; 5–20 min, 60–100% A; followed by a hold time
of 8 min (20–28 min, 100% A). Finally, column re-equilibration
was carried out at 10% A for 5 min. Mobile phase for ESI-neg con-
sisted of eluent A containing methanol/water/acetic acid (97:2:1 v/
v/v), and eluent B composed of water/acetic acid (99:1 v/v). The
solvent gradient was as follows: 0–1.5 min, 5% A; 1.5–5.5 min, 5–
70% A; 5.5–13 min, 70–100% A; The final hold time was set at
10 min (13–23 min 100% A) and column re-equilibration was car-
ried out at 5% A for 5 min. Identification and quantification, in
which ammonium adduct of enniatin B [M+NH4]+ (m/z 657) was
fragmented in the collision cell to the product ions (m/z 196 at
41 eV as quantifier ion and m/z 640 at 23 eV as qualifier ion) were
performed.
3-(Butan-2-yl)-6-(propan-2-yl)-4-methyl-morpholine-2,5-dione
(1c): C12H21NO3; M = 227.30; yield = 36%; RI 1645; MS [60–500
m/z]: 227 (M+), 185, 171, 156, 142, 129, 126, 100, 88, 83, 71, 69;
IR (film), cmÀ1: 2969, 2935, 2877, 1733, 1650, 1464, 1436, 1418,
1387, 1258, 1220, 1160, 1104, 1064, 960, 930, 899, 851, 776,
669.
3.5. Synthesis
2-Bromo-3-methylbutanoyl chloride (4): 21.8 ml (35.7 g; 0.3 mol)
of thionyl chloride were added dropwise to a stirred solution of
11 ml (10.2 g; 0.1 mol) isovaleric acid in 20 ml tetrachlorometh-