Journal of the American Chemical Society
Communication
1c). This work represents the first asymmetric divinylation
reaction of alkenes. High chemo-, regio-, and enantioselectivity
was generally obtained by using chiral t-Bu-pmrox (L12)13 and
3,5-difluoro-pyrox ligands L3−L5,14 which have not previously
been realized in the field of alkene functionalization.
significant amount of cyclized protonation byproduct 12 (see
below) (entry 5). The MnBr2 formed in situ may account for
the decreased yield and enantioselectivity (see Table S3). No
reaction was observed in the absence of a nickel catalyst or
reductant (entry 6).
Cross-electrophile coupling has recently emerged as a
promising tool for forging the C−C bonds.15 Our group has
an ongoing interest in developing new and unconventional
coupling partners for this type of chemistry.16 Very recently,
we reported a nickel-catalyzed enantioselective cross-electro-
phile aryl-vinylation reaction of unactivated alkenes.7a We
wondered whether nonaromatic tethered substrate could be
involved and afford new chiral cyclic architectures. We then
focused on the reaction of 2-bromo-1,6-diene 1a with vinyl
bromide 2a (Table 1, also see Table S1 for details). After
The choice of ligand had a substantial effect on the reaction
(Table 1). The 5-CF3-pyrox ligands, which are highly effective
for enantioselective cross-electrophile aryl-vinylation reactions
of alkenes,6b,7a gave 3a in low yield and moderate ee (L1 and
L2). In the case of reaction with L1, the protonation of
cyclized intermediate was determined as the major side
reaction. Further studies in the field of pyrox ligands revealed
that 3,5-difluoro-pyrox ligands14 could be used to improve the
yield and enantioselectivity (L3−L5), and indeed, the use of
L5 gave 3a in 62% yield and 86% ee. While chiral ligands,
including (S,S)-Bn-biOx (L6),17 (S,S)-iBu-biOx (L7),1j,m
(S,S)-Ph-box (L8),18 (S)-Ph-Phox (L9),6c and (S,Sp)-iPr-
Phosferrox (L10),6a,d proved highly effective for asymmetric
cross-electrophile difunctionalization of alkenes and cross-
coupling reactions, they failed to give any desired product. The
reaction of (S,S)-Ph-PyBox (L11) gave 3a in 9% yield and 5%
ee. Finally, we found that pmrox ligands L12−L16 were
effective for this reaction, and the use of t-Bu-pmrox (L12)
gave the best result.13
The sulfonate groups had little effect on the reaction. In
general, the reactions of fluorinated aryl sulfonates gave slightly
higher enantioselectivity than those of electron-rich derivatives
(1b−e). However, the enantioselectivity decreased slightly
when the more electron-poor CF3 group was used (1f).
Mesylated substrate 1g gave the desired product in 88% yield
and 84% ee. N-Benzyl diene 1h did not give any desired
product, and most of staring materials were recovered.
With the optimal reaction conditions in hand, we studied the
scope of the reaction for vinyl electrophiles (Table 2). Styrenyl
bromides, bearing either electron-rich or -poor groups, coupled
with 1a efficiently to afford 3i−p in moderate to high yields
and 88−95% ee. Substituents at the para-, meta-, or ortho-
positions of the aryl group were tolerated (3i−k). The absolute
configuration of 3k was determined by X-ray analysis, and that
of all other products was assigned accordingly.19 Function-
alities, including silyl ether (3l), aryl fluoride (3m), chloride
(3n), and trifluoromethyl and ester groups (3o and 3p), were
tolerated. The reactions of heteroaryl and polyaryl substrates
afforded the divinylation products 3q−t in good yields and
high ee. The reaction of dienyl bromide afforded triene 3u in
68% yield and 93% ee. cis-β-Bromostyrene gave 3v in 54%
yield with partial retention of alkene stereochemistry but a
decreased ee value. Trisubstituted vinyl bromide also worked
and gave 3w in 87% ee. However, when α-bromostyrene was
employed, the reaction resulted in recovery of 1a and 2q (3x).
Internal vinyl triflates are more readily available than bromide
derivatives. Their reactions afforded the target products with a
scope that is complementary to those of vinyl bromides. Cyclic
vinyl triflates, including five-, six-, and eight-membered rings,
were coupled well; the reactions delivered 3y−ab in high
enantioselectivity. Acyclic vinyl triflates also worked. For
example, the reactions of gem-substituted substrates afforded
3ac−ad in moderate yields with good to high enantioselectiv-
ity.
a
Table 1. Optimization of the Reaction Conditions
entry
change of conditions
none
Ni(cod)2 instead of NiBr2
NiCl2 instead of NiBr2
NiI2 instead of NiBr2
Mn instead of Zn
yield (%)
ee (%)
b
1
2
3
4
5
84 (78)
92
88
87
86
60
62
70
72
32
numerous trials, we determined that the combination of NiBr2,
t-Bu-pmrox L12, and Zn in DMA at −5 °C gave the best
result; the reaction afforded 3a in 78% isolated yield and 92%
ee (entry 1). The reactions also worked in the presence of
other nickel sources but resulted in decreased yields and
slightly lower ee values (entries 2−4). Unlike previous
observations with aryl-vinylation reactions,7a the use of Mn
instead of Zn gave 3a in low yield, and the reaction afforded a
In comparison to aryl-tethered alkenes, the chemo- and
enantioselectivity of cross-electrophile divinylation of non-
aromatic substrate is much more difficult to control. This
agrees with the fact that due to the inherent similarity in the
12962
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 12961−12967