L. Chen, C.-J. Li / Tetrahedron Letters 45 (2004) 2771–2774
2773
electron-deficient terminal alkyne, such as ethyl propi-
olate, with an internal alkyne methyl 2-butynoate was
also examined but it did not generate the desired prod-
uct under the same reactions conditions.
2.5 mol %) in 1 mL water was stirred at room tempera-
ture or 60 ꢁC. After the starting material was consumed
as monitored byTLC, the reaction mixture was
extracted with ethyl ether (3 · 10 mL). The combined
organic phase was dried byanhydrous sodium sulfate
and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by
column chromatography(hexane–ethly acetate ¼ 10:1)
to give the pure product.
Subsequently, the terminal alkynes were extended from
aromatic alkynes (Table 2, entries 1–7) to conjugated
alkynes (Table 2, entries 8 and 9), aliphatic alkynes
(Table 2, entries 11–13) and triethylsilylacetylene (Table
2, entry14) and the activated alkynes were extended
from ketone (Table 2, entries 1–3 and 8) to ester (Table
2, entries 4–7 and 9–14), from aromatic substituted
alkynes (Table 2, entries 1–5, 8, 9 and 11) to aliphatic
substituted alkynes (Table 2, entries 6, 7, 10 and 12–14).
As shown in Table 2, the yields are from good to
excellent. Toluene was also examined as solvent, how-
ever, it resulted in much lower reactivityin the reactions
(Table 2, entries 1–7), possiblybecause water lowers the
energyof the transition state. A tentative mechanism is
proposed, which involves the activation of C–H bond by
Cu(I) to form the copper acetylide; transmetalation
between the copper intermediate with palladium gener-
ates palladium acetylide, which undergoes addition to
activated alkynes (Scheme 2).
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to NSF and NSF-EPA Joint Program
for a Sustainable Environment for partial support of our
research.
References and notes
1. Trost, B. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 259;
Trost, B. M. Science 1991, 254, 1471.
2. Knopfel, T. F.; Carreira, E. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003,
125, 6054–6055.
3. Boyall, D.; Frantz, D. E.; Carreira, E. M. Org. Lett. 2002,
4, 2605–2606; Sasaki, H.; Boyall, D.; Carreira, E. M. Helv.
Chim. Acta 2001, 84, 964–971; Anand, N. K.; Carreira, E.
M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 9687–9688; Frantz, D.
E.; Fassler, R.; Carreira, E. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000,
122, 1806–1807.
4. Shintani, R.; Fu, G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125,
10778–10779; Wei, C.; Li, C.-J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003,
125, 9584–9585; Li, C.-J.; Wei, C. Chem. Commun. 2002,
268–269; Wei, C.; Li, C.-J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,
5638–5639; Zhang, J.; Wei, C.; Li, C.-J. Tetrahedron Lett.
2002, 43, 5731–5733; Wei, C. M.; Li, Z. G.; Li, C. J. Org.
Lett. 2003, 5, 4473–4475; Fischer, C.; Carreira, E. M. Org.
Lett. 2001, 3, 4319–4321.
5. Patel, S. K.; Py, S.; Pandya, S. U.; Chavant, P. Y.; Vallee,
Y. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2003, 14, 525–528; Fassler,
R.; Frantz, D. E.; Oetiker, J.; Carreira, E. M. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 3054–3056; Frantz, D. E.;
Fassler, R.; Carreira, E. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121,
11245–11246.
In conclusion, we have described a facile method for the
synthesis of conjugated enynes from terminal alkynes
and electron-deficient alkynes. The noteworthy feature
of the reaction process includes: (1) the catalyst system is
effective enough to catalyze the desired reaction but does
not catalyze the undesired competition reaction; (2) the
catalysts are common, inexpensive, and commercially
available; (3) the reactions run well in water and
importantly, it is actually better than toluene solvent in
the reaction process; (4) the reaction procedure is easyto
execute. The scope, mechanism, and synthetic applica-
tion of this reaction in water are under investigation.
A general experimental procedure. A mixture of terminal
alkyne (1 mmol), acceptor alkyne (0.5 mmol), CuBr
(4.5 mg, 5 mol %), and Pd(II)Cl2(PPh3)2 (9.3 mg,
6. Trost, B. M.; Sorum, M. T.; Chan, C.; Harms, A. E.;
Ruhter, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 698–708; Trost,
B. M.; Harms, A. E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 3971–
3974; Trost, B. M.; Chan, C.; Ruhter, G. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1987, 109, 3486–3487; Trost, B. M.; Li, C. J. Synthesis
1994, 1267.
R'
EWG
R'
EWG
L
Pd
R
X
Pd
L
R
X
-L
L
7. Melis, K.; Opstal, T.; Verpoort, F. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002,
3779–3784; Melis, K.; Vos, D. D.; Jacobs, P.; Verpoort, F.
J. Organomet. Chem. 2002, 659, 159–164; Dash, A. K.;
Eisen, M. S. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 737–740; Trost, B. M.;
Sorum, M. T.; Chan, C.; Harms, A. E.; Ruhter, G. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 698–708; Evans, W. J.; Keyer, R. A.;
R
CuX
+L
R
Cu
HX
€
Ziller, J. W. Organometallics 1993, 12, 2618; Schafer, M.;
R'
EWG
Mahr, N.; Wolf, J.; Werner, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl. 1993, 32, 1315; Horton, A. D. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1992, 185; Wakatsuki, Y.; Yamazaki, H.;
Kumegawa, N.; Satoh, T.; Satoh, J. Y. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1991, 113, 9604; Bianchini, C.; Peruzzini, M.; Zano-
bini, F.; Frediani, P.; Albinati, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991,
113, 5453; Heeres, H. J.; Teuben, J. H. Organometallics
1991, 10, 1980; Ohshita, J.; Furumori, K.; Matsuguchi, A.;
Ishikawa, M. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 3277; Thompson, M.
E.; Baxter, S. M.; Bulls, A. R.; Burger, B. J.; Nolan, M. C.;
L
Pd
L
L
X
X
Pd
L
X
R'
EWG
R
R
Scheme 2. Tentative mechanism for the addition reaction.