696
R. Singh, N.K. Kaushik / Spectrochimica Acta Part A 72 (2009) 691–696
of activation, in turn, reflected the kinetic liability of the com-
plexes Table 6.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Dr. R.L. Gupta and Bijul Lakshman A, Divison
of Agricultural Chemicals, Indian Agricultural Research Institute
(IARI), Pusa, New Delhi for the antifungal studies of the compounds
and University Scientific Instrumentation Center (USIC), University
of Delhi, India for TG/DTA studies.
3.5. Fungitoxicity testing
The in vitro antifungal activities of the ligands and their corre-
sponding complexes were tested by poisoned food technique using
poison-dextrose-agar (PDA) medium at 25, 50 and 100 ppm. Rhizoc-
tonia solanii Kuhn and Sclerotium rolfsii Saccardo were used as test
organisms. A 5 mm thick disk of fungus (spores and mycelium) cut
from earlier subcultured petridish was put in the centre of the solid-
ified medium in the test petriplates and lids replaced. Both treated
and control petriplates were kept in BOD incubator at 25 1 ◦C for
4–6 days. The mycellial growth of fungus (cm) in both treated (T)
and control (C) petriplates were measured diametrically in three
different directions. Two replicates were taken for each treatment.
From the mean growth of above reading percentage inhibition of
growth (I) was calculated by using formula: I (%) = {(C − T)/C × 100}.
ED50 values (effective dose required for 50% inhibition of fungus
growth were calculated from percent inhibition (I) as follows:
References
[1] (a) G.M. Sheldrick, W.S. Sheldrick, J. Chem. Soc. A (1970) 490;
(b) R.F. Dalton, K. Jones, J. Chem. Soc. A (1970) 493.
[2] K.C. Molloy, T.G. Purcell, J. Organomet. Chem. 303 (1986) 179.
[3] M. Lo Kong, W.N.G. Seik, C. Wei, V.G.K. Das, J Organomet. Chem. 149 (1992) 430.
[4] A. Kumari, R.V. Singh, J.P. Tandon, Phosphorus Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem. 66
(1992) 430.
[5] M. Nath, N. Sharma, C.L. Sharma, Synth. React. Inorg. Met. -Org. Chem. 20 (1990)
623.
[6] E.M. Holt, F.A.K. Nasser, A. Wilson, J.J. Zuckerman, Organometallics 4 (1985)
2073.
[7] D.X. West, N.M. Kozub, Transit. Met. Chem. 21 (1996) 52.
[8] N. Manav, N.K. Kaushik, Transit. Met. Chem. 27 (2002) 849.
[9] A.E. Liberta, D.X. West, Biometals 5 (1992) 121.
[10] (a) D. Kovala-Domertzi, A. Domopoulou, M.A. Demertzis, A. Papageorgiou, D.X.
West, Polyhedron 16 (1997) 3625;
%I − CF
9 − C
Ic
=
× 100, where CF (correction factor) =
× 100
(b) D. Kovala-Domertzi, A. Domopoulou, M.A. Demertzis, G. Valle, A. Papageor-
giou, J. Inorg. Biochem. 68 (1997) 147.
100 − CF
C
[11] Rajeev Singh, N.K. Kaushik, Spectrochim. Acta A 65 (2006) 950.
[12] H.H. Horowitz, G. Metzger, Anal. Chem. 35 (1963) 1464.
[13] K. Sisido, Y. Takeda, Z. Kinugawa, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 83 (1961) 538.
[14] N. Manav, N. Gandhi, N.K. Kaushik, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 61 (2000) 127.
[15] V.Ya Kazakova, I.Ya Partovskii, Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSR 134 (1960) 824;
V.Ya Kazakova, I.Ya Partovskii, Chem. Abstr. 55 (1961) 6843a.
[16] G.C. Perey, D.A. Thoruton, Inorg. Nucl. Chem. Lett. 7 (1971) 599.
[17] M.R. Ferrari, G.G. Fava, M. Lanfrachi, C. Pelizzi, P. Tarasconi, Inorg. Chim. Acta
181 (1991) 253.
where 9 is the diameter of the petriplate (cm) and C is the growth of
fungus in control. From the concentration (ppm) and corresponding
corrected %I data of each compound, the ED50 (ppm) was calcu-
lated with the help of Basic LD50 programme version 1.1 [20]. In
general, when the compounds were found to posses very high activ-
ity. The results revealed that all the metal complexes are more
active than their corresponding ligands against the same microor-
ganisms. With increase in concentration of the compounds there
occurs increase in percentage of inhibition. Higher concentration
proves inhibitory for fungal growth Table 7.
[18] R.J.H. Clark, Spectrochim. Acta 21 (1965) 955.
[19] K. Nakamoto, Infrared Raman Spectra of Inorganic and Coordination Com-
pounds, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1997.
[20] J.T. Trevors, Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 37 (1986) 18–26.