6508
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 6508-6509
Stereochemical Deuterium Labeling as Mechanistic
Probe for Differentiating the Singlet- and
Triplet-Diradical Spin States in the Rearrangement
of the 2-Spiroepoxy-1,3-cyclopentanediyl to Oxetanes
Manabu Abe,*,† Waldemar Adam,‡ Yasunori Ino,† and
Masatomo Nojima†
Department of Materials Chemistry,
Graduate School of Engineering
Osaka UniVersity, Suita 565-0871, Osaka, Japan
Insitut fu¨r Organische Chemie der UniVersita¨t Wu¨rzburg
Am Hubland,D-97074 Wu¨rzburg, Germany
ReceiVed February 23, 2000
Figure 1. Partial 1H NMR spectra (600 MHz) of the oxetane 2, formed
in the photolysis of (a) nondeuterated azoalkane 1, (b) anti(d2)-1, and (c)
syn(d2)-1.
Substituent effects on the spin multiplicity of diradicals and
their reactivity have been a topic of timely current interest.1,2 We
have recently observed that for the 2-spiroepoxy-1,3-diradical 1,3-
DR the singlet ground state is preferred by ∼1 kcal/mol.3 The
latter is conveniently generated by photodenitrogenation of
spiroepoxy azoalkane 1, which unexpectedly led to the oxetane
2 by selective CO-bond cleavage of the epoxide ring.3 Herein
unequivocal stereochemical evidence is presented by means of
deuterium-labeling experiments that the oxetane (d2)-2 formation
in the photodenitrogenation of the azoalkanes anti(d2)- or syn(d2)-1
depends dramatically on the irradiation conditions (Scheme 1):
The direct (singlet) process proceeds with complete retention of
the initial azoalkane configuration, the benzophenone-sensitized
(triplet) one suffers extensive loss of stereochemical memory.
These unprecedented facts are interpreted mechanistically in terms
of a singlet nitrogen-free S-1,3-DR diradical in the direct
photodenitrogenation versus the triplet T-1,3-DR in the ben-
zophenone-sensitized one as precursors to the oxetane product
2.
The direct (344 ( 4 nm) and benzophenone-sensitized (380 (
4 nm) photodenitrogenation of the anti(d2)-1 (λmax ) 343 nm, ꢀ
185) and of the syn(d2)-1 (λmax ) 352 nm, ꢀ 85) in C6D6 with a
500-W Xenon lamp (a monochromator was used for wavelength
selection) led to the oxetane (d2)-2 (Scheme 1 and Table 1), for
which we have assigned the configurations of all the hydrogen
atoms by means of C,H-COSY and NOE measurements (600-
MHz in C6D6; cf. Supporting Information). The spectral data
allowed unequivocally to distinguish between all of the four Ha-d
hydrogen atoms, as indicated in Figure 1 (spectrum a). The direct
irradiation of anti(d2)-1 (d content 88 ( 5%) gave quantitatively
the dideuterated oxetane exo(d2)-2, whose d content was deter-
mined directly on the photolysate by 1H NMR (600 MHz)
spectroscopy (Table 1, entry 1). As is evident from Figure 1
(spectrum b), only the Ha and Hd positions (trans to the CO bond)
contain deuterium atoms (90 ( 5% content). Alternatively, the
direct irradiation of the syn(d2)-1 diastereomer (d content 88 (
5%) displayed deuteration (85 ( 5%) only at the Hb and Hc
positions [Table 1, entry 2, and Figure 1 (spectrum c)]. Thus,
these deuterium distributions unequivocally manifest that the
exo(d2)-2 or endo(d2)-2 oxetanes are formed stereoselectively
[100% retention within the experimental error (( 5%)] in the
direct photolysis of the azoalkanes anti(d2)-1 or syn(d2)-1.
Scheme 1
For the benzophenone-sensitized photolysis (380 ( 4 nm),
extensively randomized distributions of the deuterium labels were
observed at the four Ha-d positions (Table 1, entries 3 and 4). In
the absence of benzophenone, the oxetane (d2)-2 was not observed
on irradiation at 380 nm; thus, the oxetane formed in the presence
of benzophenone must be derived from the triplet-excited azo
chromophore.4-6 In the sensitized photolysis of anti(d2)-1 (d
content 88 ( 5%), the Ha and Hd positions in the oxetane (d2)-2
were deuterated only to the extent of 57 ( 5% (64% retention
when corrected for the d content in 1),7 the remainder (25 ( 5%)
of the deuteration was found at the Hb and Hc positions (Table 1,
entry 3). The sensitized photodenitrogenation of syn(d2)-1 (d
content 88 ( 5%) gave similar results (Table 1, entry 4); namely,
the extent of retention (%) of configuration in the oxetane (d2)-2
was found to be 59%. A control experiment with labeled oxetane
exo(d2)-2 showed that no deuterium scrambling occurred under
the benzophenone-sensitized irradiation conditions (380 ( 4 nm).
The results clearly signify that the stereochemical course of the
oxetane (d2)-2 formation depends on the spin state of the n,π*-
excited azo chromophore.
The mechanism in Scheme 2 is proposed to account for the
spin-state-dependent formation of the oxetane (d2)-2. To simplify
the mechanistic discussion, only the photoreaction of the anti(d2)-1
azoalkane is presented. It is generally accepted that diazenyl
diradicals DZ are the first intermediates in photodenitrogenation
of azoalkanes.8 In our case, the anti(d2)-S-DZ species may be
(4) Triplet-triplet energy transfer from benzophenone (ET ∼69 kcal/mol,
ref 5) to diazabicyclo[2.2.1]hept-2-ene (DBH) derivatives (ET ∼60 kcal/mol,
ref 6) is an energetically favored process; see, Engel, P. S. Chem. ReV. 1980,
80, 99.
(5) Leigh, W. J.; Arnold, D. R. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1980, 406.
(6) Rau, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1973, 12, 224.
(7) Retention (%) ) [d-content in the Ha or Hd positions/d content in (d2)-
1] × 100; thus, for complete randomization the retention value (%) would be
50%.
† Osaka University.
‡ Universita¨t Wu¨rzburg.
(1) (a) Skancke, A.; Hrovat, D. A.; Borden, W. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998,
120, 7079. (b) Adam, W.; Borden, W. T.; Burda, C.; Foster, H.; Heidenfelder,
T.; Heubes, M.; Hrovat, D. A.; Kita, F.; Lewis, S. B.; Scheutzow, D.; Wirz,
J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 593. (c) Abe, M.; Adam, W.; Heidenfelder,
T.; Nau, W. M.; Zhang, X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 2019.
(2) Berson, J. A. Acc. Chem. Res. 1997, 30, 238.
(8) (a) Adams, J. S.; Weisman, R. B.; Engel, P. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990,
112, 9115. (b) Adam, W.; Denninger, V.; Finzel, R.; Kita, F.; Platsch, H.;
Walter, H.; Zang, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 5027. (c) Reyes, M. B.;
Carpenter, B. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 1641. (d) Yamamoto, N.;
Olivucci, M.; Celani, P.; Bernardi, F.; Robb, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998,
120, 2391. (e) Diau, E. W.-G.; Abou-Zied, O. K.; Scala, A. A.; Zewail, A. H.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 3245.
(3) Abe, M.; Adam, W.; Nau, W. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 11304.
10.1021/ja000656s CCC: $19.00 © 2000 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 06/23/2000