M. R. Burns et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 12 (2002) 1263–1267
1267
the aromatic portion of the molecules increasing their
affinity through either a hydrophobic or intercalative
mechanism. Initial indications of the drug’s ability to
interact with nucleic acids were assessed by a DNA/
ethidium bromide dye displacement assay.25 Results
supported the moderate ability of these molecules to
interact with DNA. A DC50 of 8.7, 8.7 and 9.4 mM for
polydAdT were found for 23, 30, and 33, respectively.
Distamycin A gave a DC50 value of 44 mM using the
same conditions.
stirred at 25 ꢀC for 2 h. Filtration and evaporation gave a yel-
low oil as the crude diimine. This was suspended in 300 mL of
CH3OH and 5.46 g (144 mmol, 5.3 equiv) of solid NaBH4 was
carefully added portion-wise. The resulting solution was stir-
red at 25 ꢀC for 20 h when the reaction was quenched by the
careful addition of 6 N HCl until strongly acidic (ꢁ35 mL).
The resulting mixture was diluted by the addition of 300 mL of
H2O and 300 mL CH2Cl2. The aqueous layer was made basic
by the addition of excess 4 N NaOH. Two additional washes
of the basic aqueous layer with equal portions of CH2Cl2 were
performed. The combined organic layers were washed with
brine, dried and evaporated to give 10.38 g yellow oil as the
crude product. Column chromatography using CHCl3/iPrOH/
concd NH4OH 88:10:2 gave 8.42 g (84%) white foam. The
analytical sample was crystallized from EtOH. 1H NMR
CHCl3, ppm from internal Si(CH3)4 d 8.22 (d, 2H), 7.96 (d,
2H), 7.84 (d, 2H), 7.55 (m, 8H), 4.32 (s, 4H), 2.84 (m, 4H),
1.71 (m, 4H), 1.42 (br s, 2H); 13C NMR (CHCl3, ppm from
residual solvent signal): d 135.9, 133.6, 131.6, 128.5, 127.5,
125.9, 125.7, 125.4, 125.2, 123.4, 51.6, 49.8, 27.9. HRMS by
MALDI-FTMS: calcd for C26H28N2Na+ 391.2150. Obsd:
391.2155. Samples were analyzed for purity by HPLC over a
C-18 column using a 40 min gradient of 5–100% CH3CN in
H2O both containing 0.1% TFA.
In conclusion, we have obtained nearly a 300-fold
improvement in the cytotoxic properties of a series of
compounds through optimization of the aromatic con-
stituent attached to a central diamine core of the mol-
ecule. Large polycyclic aromatic substitution led to the
working hypothesis that these molecules may be inter-
acting with nucleic acids via a combination of ionic and
either hydrophobic or intercalating interactions. The
observed ability of several of these compounds to
induce apoptosis provided an alternative suggestion that
interaction with apoptosis pathway components may be
playing a role in their cytotoxic activities.26
17. Moyano, N.; Frydman, J.; Buldain, G.; Ruiz, O.; Fryd-
man, R. B. J. Med. Chem. 1990, 33, 1969.
18. Krapcho, A. P.; Kuell, C. S. Synth. Commun. 1990, 20, 2559.
19. Cledera, P.; Avendano, C.; Menendez, J. C. Tetrahedron
1998, 54, 12349.
References and Notes
20. (a) Analogue 3 has been described in ref 11. (b) Analogue
4 has been described in ref 14. (c) Analogue 22 was described
by: Bergeron, R. J.; Wiegand, J.; Weimar, W. R.; Snyder, P. S.
Pharmacol. Res. 1998, 38, 367. (d) Analogue 20 was described
by: Yan, Q.; Anderegg, G. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1985, 105, 121.
(e) Analogues 21 and 25 were reported by: Colautti, A.;
Maurich, V. Boll. Chim. Farm. 1972, 111, 593.
1. Nadassy, K.; Wodak, S. J.; Janin, J. Biochemistry 1999, 38,
1999.
2. Dervan, P. B. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2001, 9, 2215.
3. Kikuta, E.; Koike, T.; Kimura, E. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2000,
79, 253.
4. Kikuta, E.; Aoki, S.; Kimura, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001,
123, 7911.
21. Cells were plated in 96-well plates in the respective media
(MDA-MB-231 and A375 used DMEM while PC-3 used
F12K. SK-OV-3, Mes-SA and Mes-SA/Dx5 cells were cul-
tured in McCoy’s 5A media. SK-Mel-5 cells used EMEM
while T47.D cells used RPMI 1640 media. All media con-
tained 1 mM aminoguanidine, 50 U/mL penicillin, 50 mg/mL
streptomycin and 10% fetal bovine serum. A375 and T47.D
used 1 mM sodium pyruvate while A375, T47.D and MDA-
MB-231 had 2 mM l-glutamine. Additionally, T47.D cells had
0.4% insulin). After 24 h, drug was added and cells were
allowed to grow for an additional 72 h. Cell number was
determined by MTS assay used as described by manufacturer
(Promega).
5. Canellakis, E. S.; Shaw, Y. H.; Hanners, W. E.; Schwartz,
R. A. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1976, 418, 277.
6. Canellakis, E. S.; Bellantone, R. A. Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1976, 418, 290.
7. Gamage, S. A.; Spicer, J. A.; Finlay, G. J.; Stewart, A. J.;
Charlton, P.; Baguley, B. C.; Denny, W. A. J. Med. Chem.
2001, 44, 1407.
8. Chaires, J. B.; Leng, F. F.; Przewloka, T.; Fokt, I.; Ling,
Y. H.; Perez-Soler, R.; Priebe, W. J. Med. Chem. 1997, 40, 261.
9. Deady, L. W.; Desneves, J.; Kaye, A. J.; Finlay, G. J.;
Baguley, B. C.; Denny, W. A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2000, 8, 977.
10. Kirshenbaum, M. R.; Chen, S. F.; Behrens, C. H.; Papp,
L. M.; Stafford, M. M.; Sun, J. H.; Behrens, D. L.; Fredericks,
J. R.; Polkus, S. T.; Sipple, P. Cancer Res. 1994, 54, 2199.
11. Brana, M. F.; Castellano, J. M.; Moran, M.; Perez de
Vega, M. J.; Perron, D.; Conlon, D.; Bousquet, P. F.;
Romerdahl, C. A.; Robinson, S. P. Anticancer Drug. Des.
1996, 11, 297.
12. O’Reilly, S.; Baker, S. D.; Sartorius, S.; Rowinsky, E. K.;
Finizio, M.; Lubiniecki, G. M.; Grochow, L. B.; Gray, J. E.;
Pieniaszek, H. J.; Donehower, R. C. Ann. Oncol. 1998, 9, 101.
13. Nitiss, J. L.; Zhou, J.; Rose, A.; Hsiung, Y.; Gale, K. C.;
Osheroff, N. Biochemistry 1998, 37, 3078.
14. Aizencang, G.; Harari, P.; Buldain, G.; Guerra, L.; Pickart,
M.; Hernandez, P.; Frydman, B. Cell. Mol. Biol. 1998, 44, 615.
15. Badolo, L.; Gelbcke, M.; Dubois, J.; Hanocq, M. Phar-
mazie 1998, 53, 15.
16. The synthesis of 23 is given as a representative example.
All reagents were used as received from Aldrich in their purest
and driest forms available. The mixture produced by addition
of 2.38 g (27 mmol) of 1,4-diaminobutane, 9.37 g (60 mmol, 2.2
equiv) of 1-naphthaldehyde, 8.0 mL (57.4 mmol, 2.1 equiv) of
Et3N and 6.0 g of anhyd MgSO4 in 100 mL of CH2Cl2 was
22. Moore, A.; Donahue, C. J.; Bauer, K. D.; Mather, J. P.
Methods Cell Biol. 1998, 57, 265.
23. The SSAT experiment was performed according to the
procedure used by: Porter, C. W.; Ganis, B.; Libby, P. R.;
Bergeron, R. J. Cancer Res. 1991, 51, 3715. When the positive
control DENSPM was assayed in the same manner a
6969Æ1062-fold induction of SSAT was observed.
24. Casero, R. A.; Woster, P. M. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 1.
25. These experiments were performed using an adaptation of
the procedures previously described by: Jenkins, T. C. Drug-
DNA Interactions Protocols; Fox, K. R. Ed.; In Methods in
Molecular Biology; Humana: Totowa, 1997; Vol. 90, p 195.
Results described used the following conditions: 2.5 mM poly-
dAdT, 1.5 mM ethidium bromide in 3.75 mM Tris/NaCl at pH
8.0. DC50 is the concentration required to quench half the
fluorescent signal obtained by excitation at 535 nm and emis-
sion at 590 nm.
26. Stefanelli, C.; Bonavita, F.; Stanic’, I.; Pignatti, C.; Fla-
migni, F.; Guarnieri, C.; Caldarera, C. M. FEBS Lett. 1999,
451, 95.