Scheme 2
We are grateful to Kouki Matsubara (Kyushu Univ.) for his
help in the X-ray analyses. Part of this work is financially
supported by the Japan Society of the Promotion of Science
(Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research 10450343).
Notes and references
‡ Representative spectroscopic evidence: 3a; 1H NMR (CDCl3): d 0.95 [s,
18H, C(CH3)3], 1.81 [s, 15H, C5(CH3)5], 2.22 (d, J = 10.2 Hz, 2H, anti-CH
of the allyl group), 4.53 (d, J = 6.1 Hz, 2H, syn-CH of the allyl group), 5.36
(dt, J = 6.1, 10.2 Hz, 1H, central-CH of the allyl group), 7.16 (m, 1H,
C6H5), 7.24 (m, 1H, C6H5), 7.32 (m, 1H, C6H5), 7.35 (m, 1H, C6H5), 7.44
(m, 1H, C6H5). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3): d 10.9 [C5(CH3)5], 35.5 [C(CH3)3],
58.0 [C(CH3)3], 59.7 (CH2 of the allyl group), 97.2 (CH of the allyl group),
106.6 [C5(CH3)5], 127.4, 127.6, 127.8, 129.9, 132.8, 138.6 (C6H5), 178.9
(NCN). Anal. Calc. for C28H43N2PF6Ru: C, 51.45; H, 6.63; N, 4.29. Found:
C, 51.22; H, 6.62; N, 4.34%.
Fig. 1 ORTEP drawing of 3a showing 50% thermal ellipsoids. PF62 omitted
for clarity. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°): Ru(1)–C(1–5)av
2.263(4), Ru(1)–N(1), 2.128(3), Ru(1)–N(2) 2.125(3), Ru(1)–C(11)
2.193(5), Ru(1)–C(12) 2.132, Ru(1)–C(13) 2.206, C(11)–C(12) 1.385(8),
C(12)–C(13) 1.379(8); N(1)–Ru(1)–N(2) 61.98(12), C(11)–Ru(1)–C(12)
64.1(2), C(11)–C(12)–C(13) 115.2(5).
§ Crystal data for C28H43F6N2PRu 3a: M = 653.68, orthorhombic, space
group Pbca, a = 31.771(6), b = 14.038(4), c = 13.366(5) Å, V =
5961(3) Å3, T = 293 K, Z = 8, m = 0.637 mm21, 6849 reflections
material 1a reveals that the Ru–N and Ru–C bonds (average)
become longer [1a: Ru–N 2.073(3) Å, Ru–Cav 2.158(4) Å].
The chemical reactivity of the h -allyl moiety is an
measured, 6848 unique (Rint
= 0.0409), 4403 observed ( > 2s), final
3
residuals R1 = 0.0492, wR2 = 0.1418 [I > 2s(I)]; R1 = 0.0917, wR2 =
b002927k/ for crystallographic files in .cif format.
interesting problem for the exploration of stoichiometric and
catalytic reactions mediated by 1 or 2. Preliminary studies on
the reactivity of 3a revealed that it reacted with nucleophiles
such as PhLi and sodium dimethyl methylmalonate but not with
electrophiles such as aldehydes and unsaturated molecules such
as ethylene and CO. The stoichiometric reaction of 3a with PhLi
in THF gave a mixture of 1-phenylprop-1-ene and 1-phenyl-
prop-2-ene in a ratio of 1+2. Similarly, treatment of 3a with
sodium dimethyl methylmalonate resulted in formation of
dimethyl allylmethylmalonate. In both of the reactions, re-
generation of 1a was also observed. The latter allylation
reaction can be extended to a catalytic reactions when allyl
methyl carbonate is used as the allylic substrate; 1a (10 mol%)
successfully catalyzed the reaction of allyl methyl carbonate
with dimethyl methyl malonate in THF at room temperature to
give the product in 90% yield (Scheme 2).
1 For a recent extensive review, see: R. Poli, Chem. Rev., 1996, 96, 2135
and references therein.
2 For a review on coordinatively unsaturated Ru(II) complexes, see: K. G.
Caulton, New. J. Chem., 1994, 18, 25 and references therein.
3 For recent studies of coordinatively unsaturated ruthenium(II) complexes
stabilized by nitrogen donor ligands, see the following literature and
references cited therein: C. Gemel, K. Mereite, R. Schmid and K.
Kirchner, Organometallics, 1997, 16, 5601; K.-J. Haack, S. Hayashi, A.
Fujii, T. Ikariya and R. Noyori, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1997, 36,
285; C. Gemel, J. C. Huffman, K. G. Caulton, K. Mauthner and K.
Kirchner, J. Organomet. Chem., 2000, 593, 342.
4 (a) H. Nagashima, K. Mukai and K. Itoh, Organometallics, 1984, 3,
1314; H. Nagashima, K. Mukai, Y. Shiota, K. Yamaguchi, K. Ara, T.
Fukahori, H. Suzuki, M. Akita, Y. Moro-oka and K. Itoh, Organome-
tallics, 1990, 9, 799; (b) M. O. Albers, D. C. Liles, D. J. Robinson, A.
Shaver and E. Singleton, Organometallics, 1987, 6, 2347; (c) P. J. Fagan,
W. S. Mahoney, J. C. Calabrese and I .D. Williams, Organometallics,
1990, 9, 1843; (d) E. Rüba, W. Simanko, K. Mauthner, K. M. Soldouzi,
C. Slugovc, K. Mereiter, R. Schmid and K. Kirchner, Organometallics,
1999, 18, 3843 and references therein.
In conclusion, oxidative addition of allylic substrates to the
5
isolable coordinatively unsaturated complex (h -C5Me5)Ru(h-
amidinate), has been observed which leads to a new cationic
5
3
organoruthenium(IV) complex [(h -C5Me5)Ru(h -allyl)(h-ami-
dinate)]+ stabilized by a nitrogen-donor ligand. This oxidative
addition is envisioned to be extendable to stoichiometric and
catalytic transformations of allylic substrates mediated by 1–3,
as already evidenced by our preliminary studies on the reactions
of 3a with nucleophiles.
5 T. Kondo, H. Ono, N. Sataka, T. Mitsudo and Y. Watanabe, Organome-
tallics, 1995, 14, 1945; T. Kondo, Y. Morisaki, S. Uenoyama, K. Wada
and T. Mitsudo, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 8657 and references
therein.
6 Y. Yamaguchi and H. Nagashima, Organometallics, 2000, 19, 725.
1076
Chem. Commun., 2000, 1075–1076