significantly expanded if the resulting furan was to undergo
a subsequent [4 + 2]-cycloaddition, since a cyclohexane
annulation would then result. The successful application of
this ring annulation approach for heterocyclic synthesis is
the subject of this communication.
To access synthetically more valuable targets, we focused
our attention on an intramolecular variation of the Rh(II)-
catalyzed cyclization-Diels-Alder cycloaddition cascade. In
this regard, we first investigated the IMDAF (intramolecular
Diels-Alder of furans) chemistry15 of furan 18, which was
readily formed by the Rh(II)-catalyzed reaction of 16
followed by protodesilylation with TBAF (Scheme 3).
Preparation of the propargyl diazo malonic ester system
was straightforward and high yielding. Silyl propargyl
alcohol was acylated with Meldrums acid and then allowed
to react with DCC in the presence of an appropriately
substituted alcohol to give the alkynyl ester derivative. Diazo
transfer to the activated methylene position was readily
accomplished using p-nitrobenzenesulfonyl azide and tri-
ethylamine.14 2-Diazo malonic acid methyl ester 6 was
efficiently converted to furan 9 in high yield (95%) by
treatment with a catalytic amount of rhodium acetate in
benzene at 80 °C. The Rh(II)-catalyzed cyclization reaction
was quite versatile with regard to the nature of the interacting
carbonyl group. Thus, when the cyclization reaction was
carried out with the closely related amides 7 and 8, there
was no notable difference in yield or reaction time required
for cyclization to the amino-substituted furo[3,4-c]furans 10
and 11 (Scheme 2). Exposure of the methoxy silyl substituted
Scheme 3
Scheme 2
Thermolysis of 18 afforded a 1:2-mixture of dihydrobenzo-
furan 20 and 1,7-dioxa-indacene dione 21 as the two major
products.16 In a similar manner, the related styryl-substituted
furo[3,4-c]furan 19 was easily prepared by the Rh(II)-
catalyzed reaction of diazo malonic ester 17. Heating a
sample of 19 afforded the related indacene dione 22, but
now as the minor component (36%) of the reaction mixture.
The major product (63%) corresponded to the dienol-
substituted lactam 23.
A reasonable mechanism for the formation of the IMDAF
products is outlined below. The initial step proceeds by the
expected [4 + 2]-cycloaddition of the furan across the
tethered π-bond to give cycloadduct 24. Following opening
of the oxybridge, proton loss is accompanied by dehydration
to give dihydrobenzofuran 20. When a phenyl group resides
at the bridgehead carbon (i.e., 25b), the deprotonation step
is now required to occur from the alternate γ-positions,
furan 9 to TBAF in THF afforded the desilylated furan 12
which could be induced to undergo Diels-Alder cycload-
dition at 145 °C with both N-phenylmaleimide and maleic
anhydride to furnish the expected anisole derivatives 13 and
14 in 88% and 65% yield, respectively. Interestingly, the [4
+ 2]-cycloaddition reaction of 12 with methyl vinyl ketone
in nitromethane containing an 1 equiv of methanol occurred
at room temperature and produced the ring-opened ketal 15
in quantitative yield.
(15) Kappe, C. O.; Murphree, S. S.; Padwa, A. Tetrahedron 1997, 53,
14179.
(11) Padwa, A.; Krumpe, K. E.; Zhi, L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 2623.
Padwa, A.; Chiacchio, U.; Gareau, Y.; Kassir, J. M.; Krumpe, K. E.;
Schoffstall, A. M. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 414. Padwa, A.; Krumpe, K.
E.; Kassir, J. M. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 4940.
(12) Padwa, A.; Straub, C. S. AdVances in Cycloaddition; Harmata, M.;
Ed.; JAI Press: Greenwich, CT, 1999; Vol. 6, p 55.
(13) Padwa, A.; Kinder, F. R. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 21.
(14) Regitz, M. Chem. Ber. 1966, 99, 3128. Regitz, M.; Hocker, J.;
Liedhegener, A. Organic Syntheses; Wiley: New York, 1973; Collect Vol.
V, pp 179-183. Sundberg, R. J.; Pearce, B. C. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50,
425.
(16) All new compounds in this study were fully characterized (IR, NMR,
elemental analysis, and/or HRMS). A combination of DQF-COSY, HMBC,
and HMQC NMR experiments were used to assign the stereochemistry of
the rearranged IMDAF products.
(17) An alternate possibility to rationalize the formation of 21 would
involve proton loss from the R-position of 25a followed by a rapid 1,5-
sigmatropic hydrogen shift of the resulting cyclohexadienol to give enol
26a.
(18) Woodward, R. B.; Cava, M. P.; Ollis, W. D.; Hunger, A.; Daeniker,
H. U.; Schennker, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1954, 76, 4749.
(19) Kuehne, M. E.; Xu, F. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 7490.
2094
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 14, 2000