Support Grant, ITC/05-06/02 and e-Ray Optoelectronics, Ltd.,
HK, for providing some of the organic materials for this work.
Notes and references
{ Characterization data for F2-HCNQ: mp: 309 uC decomp.; high
resolution MS: m/z 290.0159 (M2, theoretical value: 290.0158, error:
0.3448 ppm); Calcd. (C14F2N6), C: 57.95, H: 0, N: 28.96; Found, C: 57.39,
N: 28.55, H: 0.564%; FT IR (KBr, cm21): 2202, 1630 (br), 1462, 1335, 919;
UV–vis (CH2Cl2, l/log e): 402 nm/4.23.
1 D. S. Acker, R. J. Harder, W. R. Hertler, W. Mahler, L. R. Melby,
R. E. Benson and W. E. Mochel, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1960, 82, 6408.
2 P. Bando, N. Martin, J. L. Segura, C. Seoane, E. Orti, P. M. Viruela,
R. Viruela, A. Albert and F. H. Cano, J. Org. Chem., 1994, 59, 4618.
3 S. Hu¨nig and E. Herberth, Chem. Rev., 2004, 104, 5535.
4 N. Martin, J. L. Segura and C. Seoane, J. Mater. Chem., 1997, 7, 1661.
5 L. R. Melby, R. J. Harder, W. R. Hertler, W. Mahler, R. E. Benson and
W. E. Mochel, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1962, 84, 3374.
Fig. 4 I–V characteristics of 2-TNATA devices doped or undoped with
F2-HCNQ with annealing process under vacuum. Inset: I–V of F4-TCNQ
doped 2-TNATA devices with or without annealing.
6 J. Blochwitz, M. Pfeiffer, T. Fritz and K. Leo, Appl. Phys. Lett., 1998,
73, 729.
7 J. Huang, M. Pfeiffer, A. Werner, J. Blochwitz, K. Leo and S. Liu, Appl.
Phys. Lett., 2002, 80, 139.
8 M. Pfeiffer, K. Leo, X. Zhou, J. S. Huang, M. Hofmann, A. Werner
and J. Blochwitz-Nimoth, Org. Electron., 2003, 4, 89.
9 B. Maennig, J. Drechsel, D. Gebeyehu, P. Simon, F. Kozlowski,
A. Werner, F. Li, S. Grundmann, S. Sonntag, M. Koch, K. Leo,
M. Pfeiffer, H. Hoppe, D. Meissner, N. S. Sariciftci, I. Riedel,
V. Dyakonov and J. Parisi, Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process., 2004,
79, 1.
10 J. Huang, J. Blochwitz-Nimoth, M. Pfeiffer and K. Leo, J. Appl. Phys.,
2003, 93, 838.
11 Z. Zhou, M. Pfeiffer, J. Blochwitz, A. Werner, A. Nollau, T. Fritz and
K. Leo, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2001, 78, 410.
12 M. Pfeiffer, A. Beyer, T. Fritz and K. Leo, Appl. Phys. Lett., 1998, 73,
3202.
13 J. Drechsel, M. Pfeiffer, X. Zhou, A. Nollau and K. Leo, Synth. Met.,
2002, 127, 201.
14 P. Wellmann, M. Hofmann, O. Zeika, A. Werner, J. Birnstock,
R. Meerheim, G. He, K. Walzer, M. Pfeiffer and K. Leo, Inf. Disp.,
2005, 13, 393.
doped 2-TNATA devices (Type III) were annealed under vacuum
at 65 uC and 85 uC, respectively, the hole currents were found to
hold essentially constant, exhibiting very good thermal stability, as
shown in Fig. 4 while the Type II device did not. Actually, the hole
current of the F4-TCNQ doped 2-TNATA device decreased
dramatically after 65 uC annealing under vacuum, which was even
worse than the undoped control (inset of Fig. 4). Furthermore, for
the Type III device after being stored for 500 h in a desiccator
under the conditions of 30% relative humidity and 25 uC, there is
no morphology deterioration when observed through an optical
microscope. The I–V characteristic remains unchanged (see ESI{),
reflecting good quality of the film and excellent stability of the
doping system.
In summary, newly synthesized p-dopant F2-HCNQ has been
studied for application as an excellent p-type dopant in an organic
optoelectronic device. Compared to the state-of-the-art F4-TCNQ,
F2-HCNQ is a stronger electron acceptor which has higher
thermal stability and lower volatility. The deposition temperature
of F2-HCNQ is much higher than that of F4-TCNQ. A F2-
HCNQ doped 2-TNATA layer shows high hole transporting
ability up to 85 uC. All these results demonstrate that F2-HCNQ is
a promising high temperature p-type dopant material for organic
semiconductor application. Based on the preliminary study on F2-
HCNQ, we expect that an OLED device with F2-HCNQ as a
p-type dopant will have considerably improved performance, such
as low driving voltage, long lifetime, high thermal stability.
We are grateful for the support of Hong Kong Innovation and
Technology Commission Guangzhou-Hong Kong Industrial
15 C.-C. Chang, M. T. Hsieh, J.-F. Chen, S.-W. Hwang, J.-W. Ma and
C. H. Chen, Dig. Tech. Pap. – Soc. Inf. Disp. Int. Symp., 2006, 1106.
16 R. C. Wheland and J. L. Gillson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1976, 98, 3916.
17 W. J. Lyman, W. F. Reehl and D. H. Rosenblatt, in Handbook of
Chemical Property Estimation Methods, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1981,
pp. 6-11 to 6-12.
18 B. E. Koene, D. E. Loy and M. E. Thompson, Chem. Mater., 1998, 10,
2235.
19 M. R. Andersson, M. Berggren, O. Ingana¨s, G. Gustafsson,
J. C. Gustafsson-Carlberg, D. Selse, T. Hjertberg and
O. Wennerstro¨m, Macromolecules, 1995, 28, 7525.
20 A. K. Agrawal and S. A. Jenekhe, Chem. Mater., 1996, 8, 579.
21 I. Seguy, P. Jolinat, P. Destruel, J. Farenc, R. Mamy, H. Bock, J. Ip and
T. P. Nguyen, J. Appl. Phys., 2001, 89, 5442.
22 B. W. D’Andrade, S. Datta, S. R. Forrest, P. Djurovich, E. Polikarpov
and M. E. Thompson, Org. Electron., 2005, 6, 11.
23 W. Gao and A. Kahn, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2001, 79, 4040.
24 W. Gao and A. Kahn, Org. Electron., 2002, 3, 53.
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2008
Chem. Commun., 2008, 117–119 | 119