2890
R. V. Mendonca et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 12 (2002) 2887–2891
the process. The reaction is then quenched by adding sat.
References and Notes
NH4Cl solution slowly with stirring. This was then stirred for
15–30 min or till effervescence ceased. This is then extracted
with ethyl acetate (3ꢂ50 mL), dried with anhydrous Mg2SO4,
filtered and concentrated. This is then purified by flash column
chromatography using silica gel 60 and 15% ethyl acetate in
hexane to yield 317.3 mg of product. 1H NMR (200 MHz,
CDCl3) d 1.43 (s, 9H), 1.74–1.82 (m, 1H), 2.14–2.16 (m, 1H),
2.60–2.67 (m, 2H), 4.13–4.14 (d, 2H), 4.49–4.61 (m, 3H), 5.14–
5.17 (m, 1H), 7.1–7.4 (m, 10H).>99% ee by chiral HPLC
(Chiralpak OJ and OD) using a 50% IPA/50% Hexane gradient.
Note: 6 equiv of Mg turnings were used for protected mono
peptide, 9 equiv for protected dipetide, etc.)
26. General procedure for the reduction of the benzyloxy-
methyl ketone to the hydroxymethyl ketone using hydrogen
transfer conditions: To a solution of the benzyloxymethyl
ketone (214 mg, 0.39 mmol) in 12 mL ethanol was added 5 mL
cyclohexene. To this was added 35 mg 20% palladium
hydroxide on carbon (0.1 equiv by weight or greater). The
reaction was then refluxed for 1–2 h till starting material was
consumed. This was followed by TLC analysis. The reaction
was then cooled to room temperature and filtered through
Celite. The filtrate was then concentrated to give the pure
product 18. 1H NMR (200 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 0.8–1.0 (m,
6H), 1.19–1.3 (m, 1H), 1.5–1.6 (m, 1H), 1.7–1.85 (m, 1H), 1.9–
2.10 (m, 1H), 3.6–3.7 (m, 1H), 4.17–4.19 (d, 2H), 4.29–4.35 (m,
1H), 4.40–4.45 (t, 1H), 5.0–5.15 (m, 1H), 7.14–7.3 (m, 4H),
7.5–7.6 (m, 1H), 8.0–8.10 (m, 2H), 8.37 (s, 1H), 8.5–8.53 (d,
1H). M+H+ (454.20).
27. Materials: Cathepsin B (Calbiochem;San Diego, Cali-
fornia) and cathepsin L (Athens Research and Technology;
Athens, Georgia) were purified from human liver and pur-
chased from the indicated commercial sources. Human cathe-
psins S and K were cloned and expressed as described.29,30 The
enzyme active site concentrations were measured by titration
with the either E-64 or the vinyl sulfone APC-3316, Me-Pip-
Phe-HphVSPh.31
Inhibition Assays: Inhibitor potency measurements were
performed at room temperature using 96-well kinetic plate
readers. Reaction velocities were monitored at varying inhib-
itor concentrations by following the hydrolysis of amino-
methylcoumarin substrates (ex355, em460) as indicated. All
substrates were added at a concentration equal to their Km.
Control reactions in the absence of inhibitor were performed
in parallel. The Ki apparent (Ki0) values were determined by a
nonlinear least squares regression fit of the experimentally
derived data to the Morrison equation for tight-binding inhib-
itors as described32 or by least squared regression fit of the
Henderson equation for tight-binding inhibitors.33 Enzyme
and inhibitor were incubated 30-min prior to initiation of
reaction by the addition of substrate.
1. Elliott, E.;Sloane, B. F. Perspect. Drug Discov. Des. 1996,
6, 12.
2. Van Noorden, C. F.;Smith, R. E.;Rasnick, D. J. Rheu-
matol. 1988, 115, 1525.
3. Mcgrath, M.;Eakin, A. E.;Engel, J. C.;McKerrow, J. H.;
Craik, C. S.;Fletterick, R. J. J. Mol. Biol. 1995, 247, 251.
4. Katunuma, N.;Kominami, E. Rev. Physiol. Biochem.
Pharmacol. 1987, 108, 1.
5. Tezuka, K.;Tezuka, Y.;Maejima, A.;Sato, T.;Nemoto,
K.;Kamioka, H.;Hakeda, Y.;Kumegawa, M. J. Biol. Chem.
1994, 269, 1106.
6. Bromme, D.;Okamoto, K.;Wang, B. D.;Biroc, S. J. Biol.
Chem. 1996, 271, 2126.
7. Gelb, B. D.;Shi, G.-P.;Chapman, H. A.;Desnik, R. J.
Science 1996, 273, 1236.
8. Yamashita, D. S.;Dodds, R. A. Current Pharm. Des. 2000,
6, 1.
9. Hanslik, R. P.;Jacober, S. P.;Zygmut, J. J. Biochem. Bio-
phys. Acta 1991, 1073, 33.
10. Hanslik, R. P.;Zygmut, J.;Moon, J. B. Biochem. Biophys.
Acta 1990, 1035, 62.
11. Hu, L. Y.;Abeles, R. H. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. Acta
2813, 1990, 271.
12. Ando, R.;Morinaka, Y.;Nakamura, E. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1993, 115, 1174.
13. Marquis, R. W.;Yasmashita, D. S.;Lo Castro, S. M.;Oh,
H. J.;Erhard, K. F.;Des Jarlais, R. L.;Head, M. S.;Smith,
W. W.;Zhao, B.;Janson, C. A.;Abdel-Meguid, S. S.;
Tomaszek, T. A.;Levy, M. A.;Veber, D. F. J. Med. Chem.
1998, 41, 3563.
14. Gamcsik, M. P.;Malthouse, P. G.;Primrose, W. U.;
Mackenzie, N. E.;Boyd, A. S. F.;Russel, R. A.;Scott, A. I.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 6324.
15. Moon, J. B.;Coleman, R. S.;Hanslik, R. P. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1986, 108, 1350.
16. Green, G. D. J.;Shaw, E. J. J. Biol. Chem. 1981, 256,
1923.
17. Shaw, E.;Ruscica, J. J. Biol. Chem. 1968, 243, 6312.
18. Marquis, R. W.;Ru, Y.;Oh, H. J.;Yen, J.;Thompson,
S. K.;Carr, T. J.;Levy, A.;Tomaszek, T. A.;Ijames, C. F.;
Smith, W. W.;Zhao, B.;Janson, C. A.;Abdel-Meguid, S. S.;
D’Alessio, K. D.;Mcquney, M. S.;Veber, D. F. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. 1999, 7, 581.
19. Smith, R. A.;Copp, L. J.;Coles, P. J.;Pauls, H. W.;
Robinson, V. J.;Spencer, R. W.;Heard, S. B.;Krantz, A. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 4429.
20. Goering, H. L.;Rubin, T.;Newman, M. S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1954, 76, 787.
21. Martinez, J.;Bali, J. P.;Rodriguez, M.;Castro, B.;
Magous, R.;Laur, J. J. Med. Chem. 1985, 28, 1874.
22. Sommelet, M. Bull. Soc. Chim. 1907, 1, 393.
23. Normant, H.;Crisan, C. Bull. Soc. Chim 1959, 199.
24. Castro, B. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1967, 1, 533.
25. General procedure for the syntheses of alkoxymethyl
ketones: In a dry flask, Mg turnings (199 mg, 7.44 mmol), pre-
viously dried in an oven overnight at 100 ꢁC was weighed out,
along with HgCl2 (71 mg, 0.49 mmol). This was then purged
with nitrogen for 10–15 min to ensure an anhydrous atmosphere.
To this was added anhydrous THF under nitrogen. The tem-
perature was lowered to ꢀ40 ꢁC and benzyloxymethyl chloride
(1.1 mL, 7.44 mmol) was added via syringe to the stirring sus-
pension. This was then stirred under nitrogen for 6 h. The tem-
perature was allowed to warm up to 3–5 ꢁC during this time.
The temperature was then lowered to ꢀ60 ꢁC and to this was
added 400 mg (1.24 mmol) of 8 (R+CH2CH2Ph). This was then
stirred overnight and allowed to come to room temperature in
Cathepsin B: Enzyme (5.0 nM) was mixed with inhibitor in
50 mM MES or BES (pH 6.0), 2.5 mM DTT, 2.5 mM EDTA,
0.05% Tween 20 and 10% DMSO. The substrate was Z-Phe-
Arg-AMC (300 mM).
Cathepsin K: Enzyme (3.6 nM) was mixed with inhibitor in
50 mM MES (pH 5.5), 2.5 mM DTT, 2.5 mM EDTA, 0.05%
Tween-20 and 10% DMSO. The substrate was Z-Phe-Arg-
AMC (40 mM).
Cathepsin L: Enzyme (1.3 nM) was mixed with inhibitor in
50 mM MES (pH 5.5), 2.0 mM EDTA, 2 mM DTT, 0.05%
Tween-20 and 10% DMSO. The substrate was Z-Phe-Arg-
AMC (10 mM).
Cathepsin S: Enzyme (1.0 nM) was mixed with inhibitor in
50 mM MES (pH 6.5), 100 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM EDTA, 2.5 mM
2-mercaptoenthanol, 0.001% bovine serum albumin and 10%
DMSO. The substrate was Z-Val-Val-AMC (10 mM).
28. McGrath, M. E.;Palmer, J. T.;Bromme, D.;Somoza,
J. R. Protein Sci. 1998, 7, 1294.