J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 7811-7812
7811
Communications to the Editor
Chiral Space in a Unimolecular Capsule
Jose´ M. Rivera and Julius Rebek, Jr.*
The Skaggs Institute for Chemical Biology and
the Department of Chemistry
The Scripps Research Institute
10550 North Torrey Pines Road
La Jolla, California 92037
Department of Chemistry
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
Figure 1. Structural depiction of the CLAM (14). Some hydrogens and
other solubilizing groups have been omitted for clarity.
ReceiVed May 12, 2000
Alder reactions with complementary dienophiles,7 and reaction
with maleimide 38 gave the adduct 4. Oxidation of the crude
product with bromine afforded the hydrated ketone 5 (Scheme
1).7 The formation of the expected endo product was confirmed
by NOE signals in the NMR spectrum. Condensation of 5 with
excess urea afforded glycoluril 6 in moderate yield and subsequent
silylation of the hydroxy group gave the desired glycoluril 7.
Self-assembled molecular hosts capable of completely sur-
rounding their guests are one of the most recent vehicles for
enantioselective recognition.1,2 Earlier, we reported the synthesis
and characterization of systems in which symmetrical molecules
assembled through hydrogen bonds to produce racemic capsules
with dissymmetric cavitiessthe chiral “softballs”.2a A chiral guest
dictates which enantiomeric capsule is preferentially formed: an
asymmetric cavity is imprinted on the capsule by the chiral guest.
Removal of the guest leaves a chiral, nonracemic host capsule
that “remembers” the guest template (rather than its mirror image)
for up to 20 h in organic solvents.3 Useful enantioselective
complexation and chiral catalysis requires even higher kinetic
stability and we report here our progress, using a combination of
noncovalent and covalent interactions.4,5
Scheme 1
The chiral softballs racemize by dissociation to their achiral
monomers followed by reassembly to either enantiomer. If the
monomers were covalently linked in such a way that permitted
only their return to the original enantiomer, this racemization
process could be abolished. This notion led us to the system
depicted in Figure 1, a covalently linked assembled molecule
(hereafter CLAM), featuring intramolecular self-assembly. The
glycoluril units at the ends of the monomers were the most likely
sites for covalent linkages to be introduced and this consideration
led us to the pentacyclic structure 7, in which a linking group
protrudes from only one edge of the glycoluril.
Condensation of 7 with dibromide 8 gave roughly equal
amounts of diastereomers 9 and 9′, in 67% combined yield, which
could be separated by normal phase chromatography. Both 9 and
9′ were desilylated using standard conditions and the resulting
diastereomers, 10 and 10′, were separately converted to the
appropriate monomers, 11 and 11′, using procedures developed
previously.9 Either diastereomer (11 or 11′) self-assembled in
noncompetitive solvents such as benzene-d6, to give capsules. The
covalent linkage of two molecules of 11 or 11′ with N-BOC-4-
aminobutyric acid followed by deprotection with trifluoroacetic
acid and coupling with 13 gave the desired CLAMs 14 and 14′
in good yields (Scheme 2).
There were compelling reasons for using a chiral, nonracemic
maleimide. First, model compounds analogous to 9 and 9′ without
a chiral auxiliary had been prepared, and all attempts to separate
the enantiomers by HPLC with a chiral stationary phase failed.
Second, molecular modeling studies10 suggested that only one of
the two diastereomeric CLAMs was likely to fold into a capsule
The synthesis of the modified glycoluril started with com-
mercially available 1,2-cyclohexanedione 1 which was sequen-
tially bis silylated to give 1,2-bis(trimethylsilyloxy)-1,3-cyclo-
hexadiene 2.6 This electron-rich diene pairs readily in Diels-
(1) For recent reviews on self-assembled capsules see: (a) Rebek, J., Jr.
Acc. Chem. Res. 1999, 32, 278-286. (b) Conn, M. M.; Rebek, J., Jr. Chem.
ReV. 1997, 97, 1647-1668.
(2) (a) Rivera, J. M.; Mart´ın, T.; Rebek, J., Jr. Science 1998, 279, 1021-
1023. For examples of other chiral nonracemic capsules, see: (b) Nuckolls,
C.; Hof, F.; Mart´ın, T.; Rebek, J., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 10281-
10285. (c) Castellano, R. K.; Nuckolls, C.; Rebek, J., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1999, 121, 11156-11163.
(3) Rivera, J. M.; Craig, S. L.; Mart´ın, T.; Rebek, J., Jr. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 2130-3132.
(4) For examples of covalent-based chiral capsules see: (a) Park, B. S.;
Knobler, C. B.; Eid, C. N., Jr.; Warmuth, R.; Cram, D. J. Chem. Commun.
1998, 55-56. (b) Costante-Crassous, J.; Marrone, T. J.; Briggs, J. M.;
McCammon, J. A.; Collet, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 3818-3823. (c)
Yoon, J.; Cram, D. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 11796-11806. (d) Judice,
J. K.; Cram, D. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 2790-2791. (e) Collet, A.
Tetrahedron 1987, 43, 5725-5759.
(7) Reetz, M. T.; Neumeier, G. Chem. Ber. 1979, 112, 2209-2219.
(8) Reddy, P. Y.; Kondo, S.; Toru, T.; Ueno, Y. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62,
2652-2654.
(9) Tokunaga, Y.; Rudkevich, D. M.; Santamar´ıa, J.; Hilmersson, G.; Rebek,
J., Jr. Chem. Eur. J. 1998, 4, 1449-1457.
(5) For other examples of self-assembly with covalent modifications see:
Clark, T. D.; Kobayashi, K.; Ghadiri, M. R. Chem. Eur. J. 1999, 5, 782-792
and references therein.
(6) Emde, H.; Go¨tz, A.; Hofmann, K.; Simchen, G. Liebigs Ann. Chem.
1981, 1643-1657.
(10) Molecular modeling of capsules was carried out using MacroModel
6.5 and the Amber* force field: Mohamadi, F.; Richards, N. G.; Guida, W.
C.; Liskamp, R.; Lipton, M.; Caufield, C.; Chang, G.; Hendrickson, T.; Still,
W. C. J. Comput. Chem. 1990, 11, 440.
10.1021/ja0016304 CCC: $19.00 © 2000 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 07/29/2000