5434
References
1. Pu, L. H. Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 2405±2494.
2. (a) Stanforth, S. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 263±303. (b) Bringmann, G.; Walter, R.; Weirich, R. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. Engl. 1990, 29, 977±991.
3. (a) Verma, S. M.; Singh, N. D. Aust. J. Chem. 1976, 29, 295±300. (b) Kishikawa, K.; Yoshizaki, K.; Kohmoto, S.;
Yamamoto, M.; Yamaguchi, K.; Yamada, K. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1997, 1233±1239.
4. (a) Shimizu, K. D.; Dewey, T. M.; Rebek Jr., J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 5145±5149. (b) Rebek Jr., J. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1990, 29, 245±255.
5. (a) Curran, D. P.; Qi, H.; Geib, S. J.; DeMello, N. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 3131±3132. (b) Osamu, K.;
Izawa, H.; Sato, K.; Dobashi, A.; Taguchi, T. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 2634±2640.
6. Ohno, A.; Kunitomo, J.; Kawai, Y.; Kawamoto, T.; Tomishima, M.; Yoneda, F. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 9344±
9355.
7. Dai, X.; Wong, A.; Virgil, S. C. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 2597±2600.
8. Moormann, A. E.; Yen, C. H.; Yu, S. Synth. Commun. 1987, 17, 1695±1699.
9. Miller, C. A.; Long, L. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1951, 73, 4895±4898.
10. The barriers of rotation were calculated using MM2 as implemented in the software program MacroModel v5.5
(Mohamadi, F.; Richards, N. G. J.; Cuida, W. C.; Liskamp, R.; Lipton, M.; Cau®eld, C.; Chang, G.;
Hendrickson, T.; Still, W. C. J. Comput. Chem. 1990, 11, 440±467). The rotational barrier varied greatly with the
step angle of the dihedral driver. Accurate values were attained only for small step angles <1ꢀ. Larger step angles
would jump over the barrier and predict considerably smaller rotational barriers.
11. Calculated from the Arrhenius equation assuming an ideal value of A=2.08Â1010.
12. The discrepancy may be due to the severe distortions in the transition state that lead to signi®cant ÁS
contributions to the observed rotational barrier that are not accounted for in the molecular modeling force®elds.
13. Crystal data for acid 1: space group=P21/c, a=7.6765(7) A, b=19.431(3) A, c=13.378(1) A, ꢀ=90.00(0)ꢀ,
ꢁ=97.879(8)ꢀ, ꢂ=90.00(0)ꢀ, Z=4, 2920 re¯ections, R=0.034. Crystal data for amine 2: space group=P21/n,
a=8.667(2) A, b=9.316(3) A, c=24.669(4) A, ꢀ=90.00(0)ꢀ, ꢁ=93.48(2)ꢀ, ꢂ=90.00(0)ꢀ, Z=4, 3402 re¯ections,
R=0.04395. Crystallographic data for the structural analysis has been deposited with the Cambridge
Crystallographic Data Center, CCDC No. CCDC 139122 for 1 and CCDC 139123 for 2. Copies of this
14. Mitsunobu, O. Synthesis 1981, 1±28.
15. Characterization data for (+)-1 and (^)-1: 1H NMR (300 MHz, acetone-d6) ꢃ 8.04 (d, 1H, J=6.43 Hz), 7.5±7.2 (m,
12H), 3.74 (d, 1H, J=18.19 Hz), 3.45 (d, 1H, J=18.24 Hz), 1.90 (s, 3H); IR (KBr) 3056, 1781, 1714, 1591, 1474,
1442 cm^1; found (HRMS, FAB) m/z 385.1308; calcd for C24H19NO4: 385.1314; mp 225±228ꢀC, [ꢀ]2D5=^26.0 (c
1.350, 1:1 CH2Cl2/MeOH).
16. Compound (+/^)-2 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): ꢃ 8.67 (dd, 1H, J=1.65 Hz and 4.23 Hz), ꢃ 8.11 (d, 1H, J=1.63
Hz), 7.80 (d, 1H, J=8.46 Hz), 7.54±7.24 (m, 12H), 3.86 (d, 1H, J=19.4 Hz); 3.74 (d, 1H, J=18.28 Hz), 2.23 (s,
3H); found (HRMS, FAB): m/z 392.1521; calcd for C26H20N2O2: 392.1525. IR 3059, 2924, 2924, 1714, 1398, 1208
cm^1. Mp 194ꢀC.