observed that the efficiency of Suzuki reactions promoted
by TlOH is dependent on the age of the TlOH solution, with
yields decreasing substantially with older batches of reagent.
For example, during studies focusing on completion of a total
synthesis of kijanolide,15 the Suzuki coupling of 1 and 2,
using a 0.5 M stock solution of TlOH that had been prepared
1 month earlier and which had been employed successfully
in our total synthesis of bafilomycin A,8 provided 3 in 71%
yield. However, when we repeated this reaction 4 months
later using the same TlOH solution (after removing the
brown-black precipitate by filtration), the yield of 3 fell to
50%. The next time this experiment was performed, an
additional 6 months later, we prepared a fresh 0.5 M solution
of TlOH from the same batch of solid TlOH, again with
filtration to remove insoluble dark material, but the yield of
3 was still only 52%. The latter observations suggest that
TlOH may also be somewhat unstable in the solid state. Thus,
we turned our attention to identification of a suitable
replacement for TlOH.
Although thallium(I) ethoxide (TlOEt) is an easily handled
liquid that is readily available from several commercial
suppliers at lower cost than TlOH, we are aware of only
one published account in which this reagent has been used
successfully as the base in a Suzuki cross coupling reaction.16
However, there are several examples where TlOEt failed to
give acceptable results,17,18 including Kishi’s original report.4
In the later work, Kishi indicated that TlOEt gave only a
5-fold rate enhancement compared to experiments performed
using KOH, while TlOH increased the rate a 1000-fold.
Figure 1.
In a key initial experiment (Figure 1), we found that the
Suzuki cross coupling of 1 and 2 using TlOEt in an aqueous
THF solvent system, using conditions which otherwise
mirrored the previous experiments performed using the 10%
TlOH solutions, provided 3 in 83% yield. Interestingly, there
was no significant difference in the rate of coupling of 1
and 2 using either TlOH or TlOEt.
The TlOEt-promoted Suzuki reactions summarized in
Figures 1 and 2 are very fast, with TlBr or TlI precipitating
from solution immediately upon addition of TlOEt to a
mixture of the vinyl (or aryl) halide and vinyl (or aryl)
boronic acid. Although we have not performed any detailed
kinetic measurements, qualitatively these reactions appear
to be as fast as Suzuki reactions we have previously
performed using TlOH. Moreover, these reactions are
substantially faster than those performed using AgO. For
example, the coupling of 4 and 5 in the presence of AgO in
3:1 THF-H2O gave only ca. 25% conversion to 6 after a
30 min reaction period, whereas the reaction of 4 and 5 in
the presence of TlOEt is complete almost immediately after
mixing of all reagents. Kishi reported that AgO is second
only to TlOH in terms of rate acceleration (30-fold) of the
Suzuki reaction;4 however, our results suggest that TlOEt
rivals TlOH in this capacity.
We have demonstrated that TlOEt may be used with a
range of functionalized vinyl and aryl halide and vinyl- and
arylboronic acid coupling partners, as summarized in Figure
2.19 As shown in these examples, vinyl iodides (4, 11) 1,1-
dibromo olefins (7), R-iodo vinylsilanes (14), and aryl iodides
(17, 19) are excellent coupling partners, and many potentially
sensitive functional groups such as methyl esters, geminally
alkylated malonate systems, silyl ethers, enones, etc. are fully
compatible with these reaction conditions. In the accompany-
ing paper, Chemler and Danishefsky have demonstrated that
TlOEt also gives good results in intramolecular B-alkyl
Suzuki macrocyclization reactions.20
We initiated these studies on the assumption that TlOH is
an obligatory intermediate4 and that TlOEt would be rapidly
converted to TlOH under the aqueous reaction conditions.
To determine if it is necessary to run the TlOEt-promoted
Suzuki cross couplings in the presence of water, the reaction
of 4 and 5 was performed in anhydrous THF (Figure 2).
Tetraene 6 was obtained in 92% yield, compared to 97%
for the original experiment in the 3:1 THF-H2O solvent
system, with no noticeable difference in reaction rate. A
better yield of 18 was obtained from the coupling of phenyl
(15) Roush, W. R.; Brown, B. B. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 2162, and
references therein.
(16) Humphrey, J. M.; Aggen, J. B.; Chamberlin, A. R. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1996, 118, 11759.
(17) Sato, M.; Miyaura, N.; Suzuki, A. Chem. Lett. 1989, 1405.
(18) Marko´, I. E.; Murphy, F.; Dolan, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37,
2507.
(19) All new compounds were fully characterized by 1H and 13C NMR,
IR, and high-resolution mass spectroscopy.
(20) Chemler, S. R.; Danishefsky, S. J. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 2695. We
thank the Sloan-Kettering group for sharing their results with us prior to
publication.
2692
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 17, 2000