The requisite enamines are either commercially available
or prepared from 1,3-ketoesters.
Scheme 1. NHC-Catalyzed Syntheses of N-Heterocycles
Table 1. Optimization of Enantioselective Annulation of Enala
base or additive
ee %
base or additive
ee %
no base (3 days)
K2CO3
66
68
73
79
i-Pr2NEt
80
80
80
86
i-Pr2NEt þ NaBF4
˚
t-BuOK
i-Pr2NEt þ 4 A MS
NMM
i-Pr2NEt at 23 °C
a Reaction conditions: 0.1 M PhCH3, 12 h at 40 °C unless noted.
Although the key R,β-unsaturated acyl azolium can be
generated via an internal redox reaction of ynals and an
NHC,13 we choose to catalytically generate this species via
an oxidation of the Breslow intermediate formed from the
combination of enals and an NHC. Our studies began by
examining the NHC-catalyzed annulation of enal 3 and
enamine 4 in the presence of N-mesityl catalyst 1 (Table 1).
Oxidant 2, reported by Kharasch14 and utilized by
Studer,8,12g was found to be the most effective for this
reaction. The choice of base had a subtle effect. Amine
bases such as DBU, NMM, and i-Pr2NEt were found to
give higher enantioselectivity than inorganic bases
(K2CO3, t-BuOK, or Clꢀ). Additives such as molecular
sieves9b or NaBF410 did not improve the selectivity. Simply
lowering the reaction temperature to 23 °C (room
temperature) led to an agreeable increase in enantioselec-
tivity. However, further decreasing the temperature to 0 °C
prolonged the reaction time without significant enhance-
ment of the selectivity.
With the optimized conditions, we explored the scope of
this variant of the aza-Claisen reaction. A number of
stable, unprotected enamines containing cyano, ester, or
nitro groups cleanly afforded the corresponding dihydro-
pyridinones in good yields and enantioselectivities
(Scheme 2). Similarly, a broad range of R,β-unsaturated
aldehydes (aliphatic, alkenyl, or aromatic) proved to be
suitable reaction partners. The best result (96% ee, entry 12)
was obtained from coupling (E)-4-methylpent-2-enal and
(Z)-3-aminobut-2-enenitrile. Less sterically hindered enals
led to slightly diminished selectivity (entries 9 to 11).
Aromatic groups either on the enals (entries 6 to 8) or
the enamines (entries 16 to 17) afforded the expected
dihydropyridinones in greater yield than the aliphatic
counterparts. It is worth noting that the geometry of the
In2010we reportedtheenantioselective, NHC catalyzed
synthesis of dihydropyranones6 from ynals and stable
enols via catalytically generated R,β-unsaturated acyl azo-
lium intermediates. A conceptually related reaction start-
ing from R,β-unsaturated acyl fluorides and silyl enol
ethers to deliver racemic dihydropyranones was reported
just prior to our study by Lupton;7 related annulations
were reported by Studer,8 Xiao,9 and You10 shortly after
our work. As part of mechanistic studies establishing that
the key CꢀC bond forming event occurs via an NHC-
catalyzed variant of the CoatesꢀClaisen rearrangement,11
we found that the formation of a metastable hemiacetal
from the R,β-unsaturated acyl azolium and the enol was
key to the success of this reaction. Simultaneously, acyl
azoliums have been established to be surprisingly reluctant
to effect amidation reactions.12 Taken together, these
observations suggested that stable, unsubstituted enam-
ines would be suitable substrates for an aza-Claisen re-
arrangement without competing amide-bond formation.
(7) (a) Ryan, S. J.; Candish, L.; Lupton, D. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2009, 131, 14176–14177. (b) Candish, L.; Lupton, D. W. Org. Lett. 2010,
12, 4836–4839.
(8) De Sarkar, S.; Studer, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49,
9266–9269.
(9) (a) Zhu, Z. Q.; Xiao, J. C. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2010, 352, 2455–
2458. (b) Zhu, Z.-Q.; Zheng, X.-L.; Jiang, N.-F.; Wan, X.; Xiao, J.-C.
Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 8670–8672.
(10) Rong, Z.-Q.; Jia, M.-Q.; You, S.-L. Org. Lett. 2011, 13,
4080–4083.
(11) Mahatthananchai, J.; Zheng, P.; Bode, J. W. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2011, 50, 1673–1677.
(12) (a) Daigo, K.; Reed, L. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1962, 84, 659–662.
(b) Owen, T. C.; Richards, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 2520–2521.
(c) Owen, T. C.; Harris, J. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 6136–6137.
(d) Movassaghi, M.; Schmidt, M. A. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 2453–2456. (e)
Bode, J. W.; Sohn, S. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 13798–13799. (f)
Vora, H. U.; Rovis, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 13796–13797. (g) De
Sarkar, S.; Grimme, S.; Studer, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 1190–
1191.
(13) Zeitler, K. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 637–640.
(14) Kharasch, M. S.; Joshi, B. S. J. Org. Chem. 1957, 22, 1439–1443.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 19, 2011
5379