C. Saiz et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 50 (2009) 901–904
903
Ph
Ph
O
+
Ph
Ph
SH
NH2
OH
O
S
R
-C attack
R
-C attack
OH
Ph
S
N
S
S
1
2
R
1
N
1
N
N
N
N
N
2
2
O
8
NH2
N
Ph
OH
9
H
Ph
Ph
Ph
OH
Ph
migration
OH-
S
Ph
O-
R
N
R
N
a
N
N
H
O
N
N
9
H
7
-O
O
HO
pathways
S
OH-
Ph
Ph
Ph
S
R
S
R
R
N
Ph
Ph
N
N
N
Ph
migration
N
N
Ph
b
N
N
N
11
H
10
not observed
Scheme 5. Proposed mechanism for 2-hydrazolyl-5,5-diphenyl-4-thiazolidinone (7) formation.
erocycle was previously unknown and was now fully character-
ized. The HMBC experiment revealed a cross-peak between the
N–H proton and the carbonyl carbon at C4, thus confirming the reg-
iochemistry of the reaction.
With the goal to rationalize how this reaction proceeded, we
undertook a frontier orbital analysis using the semi-empirical
parametrization PM3.22 Table 3 shows HOMO/LUMO energies,
coefficients, and charge distributions calculated for model com-
pounds. The HOMO/LUMO energy gap is small and it would seem
that the reaction with thiosemicarbazone and benzil is kinetically
favored and frontier orbital control, and not charge control, should
govern the process.
calculations, and Dr. A. Rodríguez for HRMS ESI TOF-MS analyses
(Polo Tecnólogico-FQ; Proyecto Enlaces-UE URY-2003-5906).
References and notes
1. Verma, A.; Saraf, S. K. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 43, 897–905.
2. (a) Du, X.; Guo, C.; Hansell, E.; Doyle, P.; Caffrey, C.; Holler, T.; McKerrow, J.;
Cohen, F. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 2695–2703; (b) Cohen, F. E.; Du, X.; Guo, C.;
McKerrow, J. H. U.S. Patent 6 897 240, 2004.
3. Walcourt, A.; Loyevsky, M.; Lovejoy, D. B.; Gordeuk, V. R.; Richardson, D. R.
Biochem. Cell Biol. 2004, 36, 401–407.
4. Senaratne, D.; Kalinowski, D. S.; Islam, M.; Bernhardt, P. V. J. Med. Chem. 2006,
49, 6510–6521.
5. Vigorita, M. G.; Ottanà, R.; Monforte, F.; Maccari, R.; Monforte, M. T.; Trovato,
A.; Taviano, M. F.; Miceli, N.; De Luca, G.; Alcaro, S.; Ortuso, F. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. 2003, 11, 999–1006.
The proposed mechanism for the formation of 2-hydrazolyl-5,5-
diphenyl-4-thiazolidinone 7 is depicted in Scheme 5. Based on
HOMO/LUMO energies and orbital coefficients, the first step should
be the nucleophilic attack of S3 to C1, one of the two carbonyl
groups present in benzil, to form the tetrahedral intermediate 8.
This intermediate proceeds by nucleophilic attack of N1 to C2 to
give intermediate 9, in similar fashion to imidazoline formation.23
According to our results, the diol 9 undergoes a phenyl group
migration, from C2 to C1, where the largest LUMO coefficient is lo-
cated (Table 3, entry 3), which is in agreement with the observed
regiochemistry, pathway a. Even though intermediate 10 was pro-
posed by Butler and co-workers as the most favorable for phenyl
group migration in the synthesis of imidazolines, in our case inter-
mediate 10 would lead to 5-thiazolidinone 11, which was never
isolated.
In summary, in this investigation we explored the microwave-
mediated tandem reactions of aldehydes, thiosemicarbazones,
and maleic anhydrides to produce 2-hydrazolyl-4-thiazolidinones,
with yields ranging from 33% to 82%. The advantages in the use of
this methodology are shorter reaction times, higher yields, and a
minimization of synthetic operations, solvent use, and waste gen-
eration. When we investigated the scope of the tandem synthesis
for hydrazolyl-4-thiazolidinones 5, we were able to demonstrate
that the process is general for aromatic and aliphatic aldehydes;
however, the use of different types of Michael acceptors has not
yet been accomplished. As an important part of this work, we also
present the synthesis of 2-hydrazoyl-5,5-diphenyl-4-thiazolidi-
none 7, a new class of 4-thiazolidinones. We propose a mechanism
for the heterocycle formation based on a benzilic acid rearrange-
ment promoted by thiosemicarbazone.
6. Rawal, R. K.; Tripathi, R.; Katti, S. B.; Pannecouque, C.; De Clerq, E. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. 2007, 15, 1725–1731.
7. Bonde, C. G.; Gaikwad, N. J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2004, 12, 2151–2161.
8. Ottanà, R.; Maccari, R.; Ciurleo, R.; Vigorita, M. G.; Panico, A. M.; Cardile, V.;
Garufi, F.; Ronsisvalle, S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2007, 15, 7618–7625.
9. (a) Tenorio, R.; Carvalho, C.; Pessanha, C.; de Lima, J.; de Faria, A.; Alves, A.; de
Melob, E. J.; Goes, A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 15, 2575–2578;; (b) Aquino,
T.; Liesen, A.; Silva, R.; Lima, V.; Carvalho, C.; Faria, A.; de Araujo, J. M.; Lima, J.
G.; Alves, A. J.; de Melob, E. J. T.; Goesa, A. J. S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008, 16, 446–
456.
10. Plut, M.; Pollak, A.; Tisler, M.; Likar, M.; Schauer, P. S. J. Med. Chem. 1966, 9,
430–431.
11. Krbavcic, A.; Badawy, M. A.; Abdel-Hady, S. A.; Kadry, A. M.; Ibrahim, Y. A.
Sulfur Lett. 1989, 9, 149–157.
12. Ho, T. Tandem Organic Reactions; Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1992.
13. (a) Tietze, L. F.; Beifuss, U. Angew. Chem. 1993, 32, 131–132; (b) Tietze, L. F.
Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 115.
14. Wipf, P.; Fletcher, J. M.; Scarone, L. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 5463–5466.
15. Hayes, B. L. Microwave Synthesis, Chemistry at the Speed of Light; CEM:
Matthews, North Carolina, 2002. Chapter 1, p 16.
16. Typical procedure for thiazolidinone preparation (5c): To a stirred solution of p-
N,N-dimethylamine benzaldehyde (300 mg, 2.0 mmol) in toluene (1 mL) and
DMF (1 mL) were added thiosemicarbazide (220 mg, 2.4 mmol), p-toluene
sulfonic acid (30 mg, 0.2 mmol,), and maleic anhydride (987 mg, 10.0 mmol).
The reaction mixture was heated in a stirred microwave vial for 9 min at 120 °C
(200 W), poured into water (30 mL), and extracted with ethyl acetate (3 x
30 mL). The combined organic layers were dried (Na2SO4), filtered, and
concentrated. The residue was finally recrystallized from methanol to give
5 c (527 mg, 82% yield) as a yellow solid: mp 278–279 °C: 1H NMR (400 MHz,
D2O/K2CO3) d 2.42 (dd, J2 = 11.7, J3 = 16.2 Hz, 1H), 2.93 (s, 6H), 3.06 (dd, J2 = 4.1,
J3 = 16.2 Hz, 1H), 4.22 (dd, J1 = 4.1, J2 = 11.7 Hz, 1H), 6.88 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 7.61
(d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 8.20 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, D2O/K2CO3) d 40.02, 41.90
(Cendo), 41.99 (Cexo), 49.90, 113.44, 122.80, 129.22, 152.83, 155.88, 161.05,
178.95 (Cexo), 179.37 (Cendo), 190.77 (COOH); HRMS calcd for C14H16N4O3S
[M+ꢀH]: 319.0865, found: 319.0859.
17. Under the following reaction conditions: methyl acrylate acid, 3h, EtOH,
l
W,
K2CO3, 120 °C, 15 min or EtOH, KOH,
lW 120 °C, 15 min, no product was
observed.
18. Under the following reaction conditions: methyl cinnamate, 3h, PhMe,
120 °C, p-TosOH 19 min, no product was observed.
lW
Acknowledgments
19. Muccioli, G. G.; Poupaert, J. H.; Wouters, J.; Norberg, B.; Poppitz, W.; Scriba, G.;
Lambert, D. M. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 1301–1307.
20. Braibante, M.; Braibante, H.; Uliana, M. P.; Costa, C. C.; Spenazzatto, M. J. Brazil
Chem. Soc. 2008, 19, 909–913.
21. To a stirred solution of 4-methoxybenzylidene thiosemicarbazone 3g (177 mg,
0.91 mmol) in DMSO (1.5 mL) were added benzil (150 mg, 0.60 mmol) and
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health-
FIRCA (R03TW007772) and UdelaR (CSIC-No. 349). We would like
to thank Professor O. Ventura and Dr. P. Saenz in the Computa-
tional Chemistry and Biology Group for assistance in theoretical