3624 Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2010, Vol. 53, No. 9
Haynes et al.
On the basis of SAR studies, the structural elements
required in a phenylacetamide based GK activator can be
summarized as follows: (i) an electron withdrawing substitu-
ent is necessary at R1; (ii) a five- or six-membered alicyclic ring
is optimal at R2; (iii) a hydrogen bond donor-acceptor pair as
part of an N-acylurea or an amide of 2-amino heterocycle with
a H-bond acceptor capability (Figure 2) is required at R3;
(iv) the R-stereochemistry at the chiral center is needed.
In Vitro and in Vivo Activity Profile of Compounds 9a and
21a. Extensive evaluation of several analogues for their
in vitro potency and in vitro safety assessment assays led to
the selection of 9a and 21a as advanced lead molecules.
Consistent with the pancreatic β-cell hypothesis, these glu-
cokinase activators have been shown to augment insulin
release in studies conducted in freshly isolated rodent pan-
creatic islets and in pancreatic cell lines.5,11 In general,
glucokinase activators shift the glucose stimulated insulin
release (GSIR) threshold to the left in a concentration-depen-
dent and glucose-dependent manner. Glucokinase activator
concentrations associated with cellular activity ranged from
submicromolar to low micromolar range and can vary
depending on the assay conditions and glucose levels (vide
supra). Compound 9a dose-dependently increased the enzy-
matic activity of GK across a wide range of glucose con-
centrations (Figure 3), whereas the corresponding S-
enantiomer was inactive (not shown). Activation of GK
was driven by dual effects of increasing the enzyme’s Vmax
(Figure 3B) and lowering its S0.5 (concentration of glucose
at half-maximal velocity) for glucose (Figure 3C). The
magnitude of these effects at 1 and 20 μM activator con-
centration was determined by fitting the data to the Hill
equation (Table 3). Compound 9a exerted a relatively larger
increase in Vmax (1.7-fold change for 9a versus 1.4-fold
change for 21a at 20 μM), whereas 21a showed a greater
effect on reducing the enzyme’s S0.5 for glucose (1.8 mmol/L
for 9a versus 0.84 mmol/L for 21a at 20 μM activator
concentration).
trials in healthy volunteers. Following a single oral dose, 21a
reduced fasting and postprandial glucose levels following an
OGTT, was well tolerated, and displayed no adverse effects
related to drug administration other than hypoglycemia at
the maximum dose (400 mg), which defined the maximum
tolerated dose.13
Conclusion
In summary, we have discovered two potent allosteric GK
activator molecules, 9a and 21a, based on the optimization of
a unique N-acylurea hit molecule 1. The results of the SAR
work established a useful pharmacophore model that we
exploitedinthe design of severalpotent glucokinaseactivators
including 21a, the one that we used to demonstrate the clinical
relevance of targeting GK for the treatment of T2D.
Acknowledgment. The authors thank Dr. Jefferson Tilley
for helpful discussions. The authors are grateful to Dr.
Anthony Greway for DMPK support, Linda Marcus for
the GK activity assays, and Dr. Amy Sarjeant for the
compound 9a X-ray structure determination. The authors
are also grateful to all members of the Department of
Physical Chemistry, Hoffman-La Roche, for the character-
ization of the compounds.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures
and analytical data for all intermediate and final compounds.
This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://
pubs.acs.org.
References
(1) De Fronzo, R. A. From the triumvirate to the ominous octet: a new
paradigm for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus diabetes.
Diabetes 2009, 58, 773–795.
(2) Matschinsky, F. M. Assessing the potential of glucokinase
activators in diabetes therapy. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2009, 8,
399–416.
Consistent with the role of pancreatic β-cell GK, treat-
ment of rodent islets with 9a14 (Figure 4) or 21a5 shifted the
glucose-stimulated insulin release curve to the left as demon-
strated in perifusion studies using isolated pancreatic islets.
To better discriminate between the two GK activators, head-to-
head in vivo efficacy studies were performed. Oral adminis-
tration of 9a and 21a (50 mg/kg) to male C57Bl/6J mice
caused a statistically significant reduction in fasting glucose
levels and improvement in glucose tolerance relative to the
vehicle treated animals (Figure 5A). Compound 21a showed
a statistically significant superior effect during the oral
glucose tolerance test (OGTT) relative to 9a (Figure 5B).
Comparison of rat PK parameters indicated that 21a displayed
lower clearance and higher oral bioavailability compared to 9a
(Table 4). Oral bioavailability of the 30 mg/kg 21a dose
exceeded 100% probably as a result of precipitation at the
injection site or insufficient sampling following iv administra-
tion and the consequent failure to fully capture the distribution
phase. Other possibilities (saturable hepatic first-pass clear-
ance or gut wall metabolism) cannot be excluded. The PK
properties of orally administered 21a were similar between the
geluciresolution and klucel suspension. Oralbioavailabilityin
dog and monkey was 109% and 67%, respectively, using
Klucel (hydroxypropylcellulose)12 suspension.
(3) Grimsby, J.; Berthel, S. J.; Sarabu, R. Glucokinase activators for
the potential treatment of type 2 diabetes. Curr. Top. Med. Chem.
2008, 8, 1524–1532.
(4) Coghlan, M.; Leighton, B. Glucokinase activators in diabetes
management. Expert Opin. Invest. Drugs 2008, 17, 145–167.
(5) Grimsby, J.; Sarabu, R.; Corbett, W. L.; Haynes, N. E.; Bizzaro,
F. T.; Coffey, J. W.; Guertin, K. R.; Hilliard, D. H.; Kester,
R. F. K.; Mahaney, P. E.; Marcus, L.; Qi, L.; Spence, C. L.; Tengi,
J.; Magnuson, M. A.; Chu, C. A.; Dvorozniak, M. T.; Matschinsky,
F. M.; Grippo, J. F. Allosteric activators of glucokinase: potential
role in diabetes therapy. Science 2003, 301, 370–373.
(6) (a) Bertram, L. S.; Black, D.; Biner, P. H.; Chatfield, R.; Cooke, A.;
Fyfe, M. C. T.; Murray, P. J.; Naud, F.; Nawano, M.; Procter,
M. J.; Rakipovski, G.; Rasamison, C. M.; Reynet, C.; Schofield,
K. L.; Shah, V. K.; Spindler, F.; Taylor, A.; Turton, R.; Williams,
G. M.; Wong-Kai-In, P.; Yasuda, K. SAR, pharmacokinetics,
safety, and efficacy of glucokinase activating 2-(4-sulfonylphenyl)-
N-thiazol-2-yl-acetamides: discovery of PSN-GK1. J. Med. Chem.
2008, 51, 4340–4345. (b) Efanov, A. M.; Barrett, D. G.; Brenner, M. B.;
Briggs, S. L.; Delaunois, A.; Durbin, J. D.; Giese, U.; Guo, H.; Radloff,
M.; Gil, G. S.; Sewing, S.; Wang, Y.; Weichert, A.; Zaliani, A.; Gromada,
J. A novel glucokinase activator modulates pancreatic islet and hepato-
cyte function. Endocrinology 2005, 146, 3696–3701. (c) Castelhano,
A. L.; Dong, H.; Fyfe, M. C. T.; Gardner, L. S.; Kamikozawa, Y.;
Kurabayashi, S.; Nawano, M.; Ohashi, R.; Procter, M. J.; Qiu, L.;
Rasamison, C. M.; Schofield, K. L.; Shah, V. K.; Ueta, K.; Williams,
G. M.; Witter, D.; Yasuda, K. Glucokinase-activating ureas. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 15, 1501–1504.
(7) Sarabu, R.; Berthel, S. J.; Kester, R. F.; Tilley, J. W. Glucokinase
activators as new type 2 diabetes therapeutic agents. Expert Opin.
Ther. Pat. 2008, 18, 759–768.
(8) Karmouta, M. G.; Miocque, M.; Derdour, A.; Gayral, P.; Lafont,
O. Synthse de cyanacetylurees en vue d’essais vis-a-vis d’hymeno-
lepisnana. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 1989, 24, 547–549.
On the basis of the outcome of a 5-day repeat-dose toxicity
studies conducted in rats, 21a was chosen over 9a for further
development and advancement into single ascending dose