was allowed to warm to room temperature. After ca. 2 h (as indicated by
TLC), the reaction mixture was cooled to 0 °C and distilled water was added
dropwise until no further gas evolution was observed. The reaction mixture
was then filtered (Celite®) and washed with EtOAc. The organic phase was
then diluted with distilled water and extracted twice with EtOAc. The
organic layers were then combined, dried (MgSO4), filtered and the solvent
was removed in vacuo. Purification of the residue by flash chromatography
(cyclohexane–EtOAc) afforded pure 5.
‡ Selected data for 5e: H(400 MHz; CDCl3) 1.26 (d, 3H, J 6.3, CH3), 1.57
(br s, 1H, OH), 1.63–1.78 (m, 2H, FnCH2CH2), 2.42 (ddd, 1H, J 14.5, 9.6
and 6.6, FnCHaHb), 2.51 (ddd, 1H, J 14.5, 9.6 and 6.2, FnCHaHb), 3.86 (m,
1H, CHOH), 4.10–4.12 (m, 4H, 4 HCp), 4.15 (5H, s, 5 HCp); C(100
MHz; CDCl3) 23.6 (CH3), 25.7 (FnCH2), 40.4 (FnCH2CH2), 67.1 (2
Scheme 2 Reagents and conditions: i, Ac2O, pyridine (for 3a,b); AcCl,
Et3N (for 3c,e); AcBr, AcOH, NH3, toluene (for 3d); ii, 2.0 equiv. Tebbe
reagent, 4.0 equiv. pyridine, THF, 45 °C to rt; iii, 5.0 equiv. TIBAL (1 M
in toluene).†
(Table 1). The related non-reductive rearrangement of benzyl
vinyl ethers has been reported as a side-reaction to Claisen
rearrangements under radical6 or forcing thermal conditions.7
The TIBAL promoted rearrangement of diphenylmethyl iso-
propenyl ether (4c) proceeded in excellent yield. In the case of
triphenylmethyl isopropenyl ether (4d), TIBAL rearrangement
was indeed observed, although in only 35% yield, probably due
to steric hindrance. Finally, the ferrocenylmethyl isopropenyl
ether (4e) underwent smooth TIBAL promoted rearrangement
to afford 4-ferrocenylbutan-3-ol (5e)‡ in 60% yield.
In summary, substituted vinyl ethers carrying electron-
donating groups in the ether moiety undergo smooth TIBAL
promoted rearrangement to afford chain extended alcohols. This
approach constitutes a simple three step homologation proce-
dure for benzylic alcohols, carrying electron-donating sub-
stituents in the aromatic nucleus and other alcohols bearing
adjacent electron-donating groups and furthermore illustrates
the more general nature of the TIBAL induced rearrange-
ment.
CCp), 67.8 (CHOH), 67.8 (CCp), 68.0 (CCp), 68.4 (5
CCp), 88.7
(CCpCH2); m/z (CI, NH3) 276 (100%, M + 18); (calc. for C14H18OFe: C,
65.14; H, 7.03; found: C, 65.07; H, 7.19%).
1 Review: H. Frauenrath, Synthesis, 1989, 721; D. J. Dixon, S. V. Ley and
E. W. Tate, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1999, 2665; A. B. Smith, III,
P. R. Verhoest, K. P. Minbiole and J. J. Lim, Org. Lett., 1999, 1, 909;
A. B. Smith, III, K. P. Minbiole, P. R. Verhoest and T. J. Beauchamp,
Org. Lett., 1999, 1, 913.
2 S. K. Das, J.-M. Mallet and P. Sinaÿ, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1997,
36, 493 and see also M. Frank, R. Miethchen and H. Reinke, Eur. J. Org.
Chem., 1999, 1259; A. J. Pearce, M. Sollogoub, J.-M. Mallet and P.
Sinaÿ, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 1999, 2103; A. J. Pearce, J.-M. Mallet and P.
Sinaÿ, Heterocycles, 2000, 52, 819; M. Sollogoub, A. J. Pearce, A.
Hérault and P. Sinaÿ, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 2000, 11, 283; A. J.
Pearce, R. Chevalier, J.-M. Mallet and P. Sinaÿ, Eur. J. Org. Chem.,
2000, 2203.
3 M. Sollogoub, J.-M. Mallet and P. Sinaÿ, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2000,
39, 362.
We thank the European Community for a TMR Marie Curie
Research Training Grant (#ERBFMBICT983225) to A. J. P.
4
X.-P. Gu, I. Ikeda and M. Okahara, J. Org. Chem., 1988, 53, 2737.
5 J. Wennerberg, F. Ek, A. Hansson and T. Frejd, J. Org. Chem., 1999, 64,
54; J. Wennerberg, L. Eklund, M. Polla and T. Frejd, Chem. Commun.,
1997, 445.
Notes and references
6 A. W. Burgstahler, L. K. Gibbons and I. C. Nordin, J. Chem. Soc., 1963,
† Typical procedure: TIBAL (1 M in toluene, 5 equiv.) was added to a
stirred solution of starting material 4 in dry toluene (1 mL/100 mg), at 0 °C
under argon. The cooling bath was then removed and the reaction mixture
4986.
7 W. J. Le Noble, P. J. Crean and B. Gabrielsen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1964,
86, 1649.
1508
Chem. Commun., 2000, 1507–1508