G. S. Welmaker et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 10 (2000) 1991±1994
1993
Treatment of an appropriately substituted ortho-nitro-
halobenzene with 4-carbobenzyloxypiperazine-2-car-
boxylic acid12 aords the (ortho-nitrophenyl)-piper-
azine. Reduction of the nitro group and subsequent
cyclization of the aniline to the lactam is accomplished
using iron in acetic acid. At this point, the lactam can be
alkylated, if desired. The Cbz-protecting group is then
removed by hydrogenolysis. In the cases of substrates
with functionality sensitive to hydrogenolysis, the Cbz-
protecting group is removed by treatment with either
KOH in re¯uxing CH3OH±H2O13 or by HBr in acetic
acid. The resulting quinoxalinone could then be reduced
Table 2. 5-HT2C agonist functional activities for selected compounds
Compounds
5-HT2c agonist functional activitya
EC50 (nM) Æ SE % Emax Æ SE
4(R)
21
21(R)
21(S)
23
23(R)
23(S)
26
26(R)
26(S)
27(R)
86 Æ 13 (4)
95 Æ 2 (4)
12 Æ 0.1 (2)
8 Æ 3 (2)
110 Æ 2.5 (2)
112 Æ 0.5 (2)
88 Æ 4 (2)
108 Æ 5 (3)
97 (1)
290 Æ 27 (2)
136 Æ 46 (3)
19 (1)
2600 (1)
85 (1)
7.6 Æ 0.7 (3)
49 Æ 15 (2)
45 Æ 22 (2)
19 Æ 8 (2)
96 Æ 3 (3)
107 Æ 7 (2)
82 Æ 5 (2)
76 Æ 9 (2)
.
under standard conditions using BH3 THF in THF to
provide the 2,3,4,4a,5,6-hexahydro-1H-pyrazino[1,2-a]-
quinoxaline.
aEC50 values were derived from six-point-concentration±response
curves in which each concentration was tested in duplicate. Emax
values indicate relative ecacy compared to a maximally eective 5-
HT concentration. The number of independent experiments is indi-
cated in parentheses.
Initially, the racemic compounds were separated into
their enantiomeric pairs by chiral HPLC. Alternatively,
the required enantiomer was prepared by the same route
utilizing the known (R)- or (S)-4-carbobenzyloxypiper-
azine-2-carboxylic acid.14
Because compound 21R exhibited potent functional
activity as a full agonist, it was tested in vivo using a rat
feeding model.16 Compound 21R, when administered to
fasted, male Sprague±Dawley rats, produced a dose-
dependent decrease in food intake with ED50 values of
2 mg/kg (ip) and 10 mg/kg (po).
All of the analogues were tested for their 5-HT2C antago-
nist binding anity and these results are presented in
Table 1. From the antagonist binding data available, sev-
eral generalizations can be surmised. Monosubstitution
at R2, R3, or R4 has a pronounced eect on binding
anity, varying the % inhibition observed at 1 mM from
0% (5, R2=CH3) to 67% (4, R2=Cl) for R2-substitu-
tion, 0% (13, R3=NH2) to 46% (10, R3=CF3) for R3-
substitution, and 15% (17, R4=Cl) to 48% (18, R4=F)
for R4-substitution. In contrast, substitution at R1 or R5
exhibits no eect, or perhaps a modest decrease, in
the antagonist anity (1 vs 2 and 1 vs 19). Monochloro-
substitution at R2 (similar to m-CPP) gives a higher
binding anity (4, 67%) than monochloro-substitution
at R1 (2, 8%), R3 (9, 33%), or R4 (17, 15%). Interest-
ingly, reduction of the quinoxalinone (X=O) to the
quinoxaline (X=H,H) exhibited almost no eect on
the antagonist binding anity (1 vs 25, 21 vs 26 and
23R vs 27R). The most active compounds are those
with disubstitution at R2 and R3 (21, 23, and 26). In
the case of the quinoxalinones (1, 4, 21 and 23), the
(R)-enantiomer was found to be the eutomer; how-
ever, the 5-HT2C receptor failed to discriminate between
the enantiomers of the quinoxaline 26. All of the
compounds tested exhibited a higher selectively for
agonist binding over antagonist binding, suggestive of
functional agonist activity.
In summary, a series of 2,3,4,4a-tetrahydro-1H-pyr-
azino[1,2-a]quinoxalin-5-(6H)ones and 2,3,4,4a,5,6-hexa-
hydro-1H-pyrazino[1,2-a]quinoxalines were synthesized
and shown to exhibit potent 5-HT2C agonist activity in
vitro and in vivo.
References and Notes
1. (a) For a recent review of central 5-HT receptors and their
function, see: Barnes, N. M.; Sharp, T. Neuropharmacology
1999, 38, 1083. (b) Dekeyne, A.; Girardon, S.; Millan, M. J.
Neuropharmacology 1999, 38, 415 and references therein. (c)
Martin, J. R.; Bos, M.; Jenck, F.; Moreau, J.-L.; Mutel, V.;
Sleight, A. J.; Wichmann, J.; Andrews, J. S.; Berendsen, H. H.
G.; Broekkamp, C. L. E.; Ruigt, G. S. F.; Kohler, C.; van
Delft, A. M. L. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1998, 286, 913.
2. (a) Glennon, R. A.; Dukat, M. In Psychopharmacology:
The Fourth Generation of Progress; Bloom, F. E., Kupfer, D.
J., Eds.; Raven: New York, 1995; pp 415±429. (b) Molineaux,
S. M.; Jesseli, T. M.; Axel, R.; Julius, D. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A. 1989, 86, 6793. (c) Tecott, L. H.; Sun, L. M.; Akana,
S. F.; Strack, A. M.; Lowenstein, D. H.; Dallman, M. F.;
Julius, D. Nature 1995, 374, 542.
The results of the functional studies measuring [3H]ino-
sitol monophosphate ([3H]IP) formation from CHO
cells expressing human 5-HT2C receptors are depicted
in Table 2.15 In the quinoxalinone series, the (R)-enan-
tiomers of 21 and 23 demonstrated the most potent
activity and functioned as full agonists, while the (S)-
enantiomers were less potent and failed to exhibit a
maximal response when compared to serotonin. In
contrast, in the quinoxaline series (26), there was no
signi®cant dierence in potency; however, the (R)-iso-
mer did exhibit full agonism whereas the maximal eect
produced by the (S)-isomer was less than that observed
with 5-HT.
3. Bray, G. A.; Greenway, F. L. Endocr. Rev. 1999, 20, 805.
4. Rosenbaum, M.; Leibel, R. L.; Hirsch, J. N. Engl. J. Med.
1997, 337, 396.
5. Heck, A. M.; Yanovski, J. A.; Calis, K. A. Pharmacother-
apy 2000, 20, 270.
6. All compounds gave satisfactory spectral data. For example,
see: (R)-8,9-Dichloro-2,3,4,4a-tetrahydro-1H-pyrazino[1,2-a]-
quinoxalin-5-(6H)one, hydrochloride (21R): mp >290 ꢀC; H
1
NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) d 11.00 (s, 1H), 9.58 (s, 2H), 7.12
(s, 1H), 7.02 (s, 1H), 4.03 (dd, 1H, J=11.6, 3.6 Hz), 3.87 (d,
1H, J=10.7 Hz), 3.61 (dd, 1H, J=12.9, 2.0 Hz), 3.41 (d, 1H,
J=9.5 Hz), 3.42±2.99 (m, 3H); IR (KBr) 2950, 2700, 1700,
1590, 1500 cm 1; MS (APCI, m/e (%)) 272 (100, [M+H]+)
+
.
and 274 (65, [M+H] ). Anal. calcd for C11H11Cl2N3O HCl: