data indicate p-coordination of 2 via the five-membered ring
closest distances observed for the carbons atoms C2, C9
which has likewise been observed for indenyl complexes such
adjacent to P1 which are presumably the centres of highest p-
electron density,8 and the Cr–P distance amounts to 2.407(4) Å.
The distances between the metal and the carbonyl C-atoms
[1.806(3)–1.837(3) Å] and the centroid of the phospholide ring
[1.874(3) Å], respectively, compare well with the correspond-
5
as [(h -indenyl)Cr(CO)3]2 6.12 The carbonyl stretching vibra-
tions in the IR spectrum of 4 (n˜ = 1925, 1835, 1826 cm21
)
appear at higher wavenumbers than in both 6 (n˜ = 1895, 1791
5
cm21 12 and [h -(C5H4PPh3)Cr(CO)3] 7 (n˜ = 1900, 1805, 1785
cm21 13), indicating that the amount of p-electron density
transferred to the metal is lower for 2 than for the carbocyclic
ligands C9H72 and C5H4PPh3, respectively.
ing values of [h -(C5H4PPh3)Cr(CO)3] 7 (Cr–CO 1.77–1.83,
5
6
Cr–Cent. 1.862 Å13) and [(h -2,4,6-triphenylphosphini-
ne)Cr(CO)3] (Cr–CO 1.80–1.82, Cr–Cent. 1.686 Å14). The
exocyclic P2–C2 bond in 4 [1.755(3) Å] is similar than in 3 but
the endocyclic P–C [1.744(2), 1.805(2) Å] and adjacent C–C
bonds [1.426(3), 1.460(3) Å] are lengthened as expected for a p-
complex. The extent of this lengthening is somewhat more
pronounced for the P–C than for the C–C bonds which agrees
with the finding that the largest coefficients in the frontier
orbitals of benzo[c]phospholides are found at the phosphorus
and the two adjacent carbon atoms.8
The results of the X-ray structure analysis of complex 3 [Fig.
1(a)] confirms the presence of a s(P)-coordinated benzophos-
pholide ligand with a planar annulated ring system. Unlike as in
known complexes of s(P)-coordinated phospholides,3 the
metal-bound phosphorus atom lacks any evidence for pyr-
amidalisation (sum of bond angles 360°). The exocyclic P–C
bond [P2–C2 1.744(1) Å] is similar as in complexes of 1 (1.75
± 1 Å4) whereas of the endocyclic P–C distances the one to the
protonated carbon atom is shortened [P1–C9 1.691(2) Å] and
the other lengthened [P1–C2 1.767(2) Å]. The P1–Cr1 bond
[2.376(5) Å] matches that in the phosphinine complex 5
[2.372(15) Å4]. The Cr–C distances in 3 [Cr–Ctrans 1.862(4) Å,
Cr–Ccis 1.895–1.912, av. 1.902 Å] are generally longer than
those in 5 [Cr–Ctrans 1.822(12) Å, Cr–Ccis 1.825–1.865, av.
1.843 Å10]. Although interpretation of these data in terms of
electronic effects is difficult in view of sterically induced
distortions in both structures, the more pronounced shortening
of the trans-relative to the cis-Cr–C bonds in 3 agrees with a
lower p-acceptor ability of 2 as compared to 2,4,6-Ph3H2C5P
which was predicted on grounds of the spectroscopic data.
The molecular structure of 4 [Fig. 1(b)] displays a three-
legged piano-stool geometry with the coordinated five mem-
bered ring featuring a flat twist conformation. The Cr–C
distances range between 2.229(2) and 2.341(3) Å with the
Preliminary studies indicate that analogous complexes as 3, 4
are likewise accessible with molybdenum and tungsten. In
conclusion, our reported findings strongly suggest that the
electron withdrawing effect of the PPh3 group induces a
balanced coordination behaviour which enables the benzophos-
pholide 2 to act both as a phosphine-like s-donor/p-acceptor
ligand in s(P)-complexes and a phosphaarene like ligand in p-
complexes. A similar switching between different coordination
modes was previously known for phosphinines,1 but scarcely
for phospholide type species. Further exploration of this feature
as well as the possible exploitation of the chiral nature of 4 are
currently under investigation and may possibly add new facets
to the coordination chemistry of phospholide ligands.
We thank the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie and Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft for financial support.
Notes and references
1 F. Mathey, Coord. Chem. Rev., 1994, 137, 1; P. Le Floch and F. Mathey,
Coord. Chem. Rev., 1998, 179–180, 771; K. B. Dillon, F. Mathey and
J. F. Nixon, Phosphorus: The Carbon Copy, John Wiley, Chichester,
1998 and references therein.
2 B. Breit, Chem. Commun., 1996, 2071; B. Breit, J. Mol. Catal. A, 1999,
143, 143.
3 F. Mercier, L. Ricard and F. Mathey, Organometallics, 1993, 12, 98.
4 D. Gudat, M. Nieger and M. Schrott, Chem. Ber., 1995, 128, 259; D.
Gudat, M. Schrott and M. Nieger, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1995,
1541; D. Gudat, M. Schrott, V. Bajorat, M. Nieger, S. Kotila, R.
Fleischer and D. Stalke, Chem. Ber., 1996, 129, 337; D. Gudat, A. W.
Holderberg, N. Korber, M. Nieger and M. Schrott, Z. Naturforsch. Teil
B, 1999, 54, 1244.
5 D. Gudat, Coord. Chem. Rev., 1997, 173, 71.
6 p-Complexes of a benzo[b]phospholide with Li+ and Sm2+ have been
described, see: E. Niecke, M. Nieger and P. Wenderoth, Angew. Chem.,
1994, 106, 362; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1994, 33, 353; F. Nief and
L. Ricard, J. Organomet. Chem., 1994, 464, 149.
7 D. Gudat, V. Bajorat, S. Ha¨p, M. Nieger and G. Schro¨der, Eur. J. Inorg.
Chem., 1999, 1169.
8 D. Gudat, V. Bajorat and M. Nieger, Bull. Chim. Soc. Fr., 1995, 132,
280.
9 Crystal data: for 3: C31H20CrO5P2, M = 586.4, triclinic, space group
¯
P1, (no. 2), a = 10.2695(4), b = 11.0128(4), c = 13.7391(4) Å, a =
111.151(2), b = 93.476(2), g = 110.126(2)°, U = 1330.03(8) Å3, Z =
2, Dc = 1.46 g cm23, m(Mo-Ka) = 0.59 mm21, 18922 reflections
measured, 6253 unique which were used in all calculations, wR2(F2) =
0.084 (all data), R1 = 0.035 [I > 2s(I)]. For 4: C29H20CrO3P2, M =
530.4, monoclinic, space group P21/n (no. 14), a
= 8.5429(4),
b = 13.2026(9), c = 21.3056(14) Å, b = 97.658(4)°, U = 2381.6(3)
Å3, Z = 4, Dc = 1.48 g cm23, m(Mo-Ka) = 0.65 mm21, 21481
reflections measured, 4163 unique which were used in all calculations,
wR2(F2) = 0.082 (all data), R1 = 0.036 [I > 2s(I)]. CCDC 182/1721.
files in .cif format.
Fig. 1 Molecular structures of 3 (a) and 4 (b). Thermal ellipsoids are drawn
at 50% probability level, and H atoms have been omitted for clarity.
Selected bond lengths (Å); for 3, Cr–P1 2.3760(5), P1–C9 1.6910(17), C9–
C8 1.414(2), C–C7 1.422(2), C7–C6 1.370(3), C6–C5 1.398(3), C5–C4
1.379(2), C4–C3 1.417(2), C3–C8 1.430(2), C3–C2 1.456(2), C2–P1
1.7670(18), C2–P2 1.7438(17), Cr1–C1D 1.9030(19), Cr–C1B 1.912(2),
Cr–C1E 1.8953(19), Cr–C1A 1.862(2). For 4: P1–C9 1.744(4), C9–C8
1.426(0), C8–C7 1.429(3), C7–C6 1.354(0), C6–C5 1.418(1), C5–C4
1.367(3), C4–C3 1.419(0), C3–C8 1.436(1), C3–C2 1.460(2), C2–P1
1.805(0), C2–P2 1.755(3), Cr–C1A 1.826(2), Cr–C1B 1.806(1), Cr–C1C
1.837(1).
10 J. Deberitz and H. No¨th, J. Organomet. Chem., 1973, 49, 453; H.
Vahrenkamp and H. No¨th, Chem. Ber., 1973, 106, 2227.
11 C. A. Tolman, Chem. Rev., 1977, 77, 313.
12 A. Ceccon, A. Gambero, F. Gottardi, S. Santi and A. Venzo,
J. Organomet. Chem., 1991, 412, 85.
13 J. C. Kotz and D. G. Pedrotty, J. Organomet. Chem., 1970, 22, 425.
14 J. Deberitz and H. No¨th, Chem. Ber., 1970, 103, 2541; H. Vahrenkamp
and H. No¨th, Chem. Ber., 1972, 105, 1148.
1638
Chem. Commun., 2000, 1637–1638