490
LETTERS
SYNLETT
25
The effect of the Lewis acid is shown in Table 2. It is of interest to note
from Table 2 that the degree of diastereoselectivity of the addition is
influenced by the kind of substituent at the 2-position on the 1,3-
oxazolidine ring. Namely, the reactions of 1a-c, which have an aromatic
substituent, afford pairs of diastereomeric adducts (4a-c) with high
diastereoselectivities (entries 12-14), but there is poor selectivity in the
case of 2d which has an aliphatic substituent (entry 15).
CHCl )) corresponded well with the literature value ([α]
-27.1
3
D
11
(c=1.0, CHCl )). Furthermore, this compound was treated with MeI
3
in the presence of KH to give the O-methyl product (3d) in quantitative
yields, which was identified as the major product obtained from the
reaction of the chiral imine (1d). Thus, the R,R configuration of major
diastereoisomers (3a and 3d) have been determined, and we think the
other major diastereomers (3b-c) have the same configuration because
these compounds are expected to be produced through a similar reaction
mechanism. On the other hand, since the ß-amino esters (4a-c) derived
from the 1,3-oxazolidines were unknown, the major diastereoisomers,
also isolated by column chromatography, were submitted for reductive
cleavage of the benzyl group with 5% Pd-C to afford the ß-amino esters
(3a-c) in good yield, which were identical to the minor products
obtained from the reaction of the imines (1a-c) with silyl enol ether
1
based on H-NMR spectral comparison.
Thus, the proposed method seems to be of wide interest in the synthesis
of ß-amino acid derivatives since it can be applied to the selective
preparation of both asymmetric carbon atoms from
a single
enantiomeric source. Further studies on the mechanistic and synthetic
aspects of this stereoselective addition reaction are in progress.
References and Notes
1
a) Hart, D. J.; Ha, D. C. Chem. Rev. 1989, 89, 1447. b) Brown, M.
J. Heterocycles, 1989, 29, 2225. c) Van der Steen, F. K.; Van
Koten, G. Tetrahedron 1991, 47, 7503.
2
a) Enantioselective Synthesis of β-Amino Acids; Juraristi, E., Ed.;
Wiley-VCH Publishers: New York, 1996. b) Gennari, C. In
Comprehensive Organic Synthesis, Heathcock, Ed.; Pergamon:
Oxford, U.K., 1991; Vol. 2, p 629.
Scheme 3
3
a) Enders, D.; Reinhold, U. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 1997, 8,
1895. b) Guanti, G.; Narisano, E.; Banfi, L. Tetrahedron Lett.,
1987, 28, 4331. c) Kobayashi, S.; Araki, M.; Yasuda, M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 5773. d) Kobayashi, S.; Nagayama, S.
J. Org. Chem., 1997, 62, 232. e) Loh, T.-P.; Wei, L.-L.
Tetrahedron Lett., 1998, 39, 323.
4
5
Higashiyama, K.; Inoue, H.; Takahashi, H. Tetrahedron Lett.,
1992, 33, 235.
a) Higashiyama, K.; Nakahata, K.; Takahashi, H. Heterocycles,
1992, 33, 17. b) Higashiyama, K.; Nakahata, K.; Takahashi, H.
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1994, 351. c) Higashiyama, K.;
Inoue, H.; Takahashi, H. Tetrahedron, 1994, 50, 1083.
d) Higashiyama, K.; Inoue, H.; Ymauchu, T.;Takahashi, H. J.
Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1995, 111. e) Higashiyama, K.;
Nakagawa, K.; Takahashi, H. Heterocycles, 1995, 41, 2007.
6
Meyers, A. I.; Poindexter, G. S.; Brich, Z. J. Org. Chem., 1978,
43, 892.
7
8
Hunt, J. H.; McHale, D. J. Chem. Soc., 1957, 2073.
a) Agami, C.; Pizk, T. Tetrahedron, 1985, 41, 537. b) Beckett, A.
H.; Jones, G. R. Tetrahedron, 1977, 33, 3313.
9
Colvin, E. W. In Best Synthetic Methods, Silion in Organic
Synthesis; Katritsky, A. R., Meth-Cohn, O., Rees, C. W., Eds.;
Academic Press: London, 1988; p 122.
10 Diastereoselective addition of silyl enol ether to oxazolidines has
been reported. Berrien, J. F.; Billion, M. A.; Husson, H. P.; Royer,
J. J. Org. Chem., 1995, 60, 2922.
The absolute configurations of the newly formed chiral center in the
adducts was determined as follows.
1
13
The H and C-NMR data for the major diastereoisomer (3a) isolated
11 a) Mokhallalati, M. K.; Wu, M-J.; Pridgen, L. N. Tetrahedron
Lett., 1993, 34, 47. b) Mokhallalati, M. K.; Pridgen, L. N. Synth.
Commun., 1993, 23, 2055.
by column chromatography on silica gel were identical to those
reported, and optical rotation of our product ([α]
11
21
-24.5 (c=2.0,
D