A R T I C L E S
Naka et al.
Table 1. Ligand Screenings of the Aluminum Ate Base
aromatic rings with intermediary ArLi or ArMgX species, or
their precursors (alkyllithiums or alkyl Grignard reagents), which
are too highly reactive toward various electronegative functional
groups, such as halogen, amide, and cyano groups and π-de-
ficient heterocycles.8 Hydro- or carbo-alumination, which is
known to be a powerful preparative method in aliphatic
chemistry,9 is ineffective for aromatics because of the structural
limitations of benzene rings.10
R3Al(TMP)Li for Direct Generation of Functionalized Aromatic
Aluminum Compoundsa
To overcome the preparative limitation of aromatic alumi-
nums discussed above, we recently reported that the direct regio-
and chemoselective generation of functionalized aromatic
aluminum compounds was achieved by developing a novel
aluminum ate base i-Bu3Al(TMP)Li (1).11 In this article, we
will give a full account of the design, structure, function, and
reaction mechanism of this aluminum ate base. First we detail
its development and discuss its scope and limitations for the
generation of functionalized aromatic and aliphatic compounds.
Next we characterize the structure of the aluminum ate base
using spectroscopic and theoretical methods. Finally we provide
a comprehensive mechanistic discussion of the directed ortho
alumination of functionalized aromatics by means of X-ray,
NMR, IR, and DFT studies.
entry
Ph−FG
reagentsb
product
yield (%)c
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
2a (PhOMe)
Me3Al(TMP)Li (1a)
Et3Al(TMP)Li
i-Bu3Al(TMP)Li (1)
Me3Al(TMP)Li (1a)
Et3Al(TMP)Li
4a
4a
4a
4b
4b
4b
4b
12
87
88
0
0
0
2a
2a
2b (PhCN)
2b
2b
2b
t-Bu3Al(TMP)Li
i-Bu3Al(TMP)Li (1)
100
a Reaction temperatures for the first step of the reaction are room
temperature for 2a and -78 °C for 2b. b TMP ) 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpip-
eridido. c Isolated yield.
To our delight, deprotonation with Me3Al(TMP)Li (1a) of
2a gave the corresponding iodinated compound 4a in 12% yield
after the iodine quench (entry 1). Use of Et3Al(TMP)Li (entry
2) and i-Bu3Al(TMP)Li (1) (entry 3) improved the system
dramatically, furnishing 4a in high yields. In contrast, depro-
tonative alumination of 2b suffered from significant decomposi-
tion of the CN group when R3Al(TMP)Li (R ) Me, Et, t-Bu)
was used (entries 4-6). Surprisingly, the only exception to this
rule was i-Bu3Al(TMP)Li (1), which gave 2-iodobenzonitrile
(4b) in excellent yield (entry 7). In the deprotonative alumination
of 2b, modification of the i-Bu group in 1 to alkoxides or
amides, of TMP to N(i-Pr)2 or N(TMS)2, or of Li to K, MgCl,
Mg(t-Bu), or Zn(t-Bu) also gave a complex mixture of products.
Solvent effects have also been tested for the alumination of 2b
with 1, and use of noncoordinative solvents such as hexane,
toluene or CH2Cl2, or lower-coordinative ethers resulted in
decreased yields. As we found 1 in THF to be a promising
chemoselective base, we next explored its reactivity with
variously functionalized aromatic compounds (Table 2). In the
following discussions, we define i-Bu3Al(TMP)Li (1) as alu-
minum ate base.
The aluminum ate base (1) was found to be an effective and
regioselective alumination reagent for a variety of (fused)
aromatic compounds bearing electron-donating groups such as
OMe and electron-withdrawing groups such as CN, amide, Cl,
and I (entries 1-12 in Table 2). Notably, deprotonative
alumination occurred with suppression of nucleophilic addition
to carbonyl and CN groups (entries 2, 3, and 5) or benzyne
formation with halogens (entries 4-6, 11, 12) and halogen-
metal exchange reaction at iodine (entries 4-6). Such chemose-
lectivity is considered to be unique to this aluminum ate base,
because neither conventional metal bases (such as RLi) nor even
TMP zincates can coexist with the aryl iodide.18 Heteroaromatics
such as pyridine, indole, benzofuran, and benzoxazole rings were
similarly applicable substrates (entries 13-16). Trifluorometh-
ylbenzene and ferrocenyl esters also tolerated alumination.
Results and Discussion
1. Development of the Aluminum Ate Base. To find ideal
alumination reagents with broad functional group compat-
ibilities, we first tested the halogen-aluminum exchange
reactions of aryl halides using various kinds of organoaluminum
reagents.12 While related alkyllithiums,13 alkylmagnesiums,14
and zincates15 have been known to effect halogen-metal
exchange reactions smoothly, all attempts using organoalumi-
nums were unsuccessful, in spite of extensive investigation. We
then employed a different strategy; the deprotonative alumina-
tion (i.e., hydrogen-aluminum exchange reaction) of function-
alized benzenes. Starting from cleaving an aromatic C-H bond,
this reaction would be more advantageous from the viewpoint
of the availability of aromatic precursors. Pioneering work on
the deprotonation of aliphatic C-H groups using tricoordinated
dialkylamidoaluminums has been reported.16 These reagents,
however, were found to be ineffective for our purpose.
Therefore, we designed a tetracoordinated aluminum ate base,
which should have higher reactivity over conventional tricoor-
dinated aluminums.17 We first screened ligand and counter
cation candidates. Anisole (2a) and benzonitrile (2b) were
selected as model aromatic compounds with electron-donating
and electron-withdrawing groups, respectively (Table 1).
(8) Upton, C. J.; Beak, P. J. Org. Chem. 1975, 40, 1094-1098.
(9) (a) Van Horn, D. E.; Negishi, E.-i. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 4654-
4672. (b) Eisch, J. J. In ComprehensiVe Organic Synthesis; Trost, B. M.,
Ed.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1991; Vol 8, Chapter 3.
(10) Hart, H. In The Chemistry of Triple-Bonded Functional Groups, Supplement
C2; Patai, S., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons Ltd: Chichester, U.K., 1994; Chapter
18.
(11) Uchiyama, M.; Naka, H.; Matsumoto, Y.; Ohwada, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2004, 126, 10526-10527.
(12) For an exceptional example of halogen-aluminum exchange reactions,
see: Maruoka, M.; Fukutani, Y.; Yamamoto, H. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50,
4412-4414.
(13) Clayden, J. Organolithiums: SelectiVity for Synthesis; Pergamon: Elsevier
Science, Oxford, 2002.
(14) Boudier, A.; Bromm, L. O.; Lotz, M.; Knochel, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2000, 39, 4414-4435.
(15) (a) Uchiyama, M.; Koike, M.; Kameda, M.; Kondo, Y.; Sakamoto, T.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 8733-8734. (b) Uchiyama, M.; Kameda,
M.; Mishima, O.; Yokoyama, N.; Koikee, M.; Kondo, Y.; Sakamoto, T.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 4934-4946.
(16) Yasuda, A.; Tanaka, S.; Oshima, K.; Yamamoto, H.; Nozaki, H. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 6513-6514.
(17) (a) Boireau, G.; Abenhaim, D.; Bernardon, C.; Henry-Basch, E.; Sabourault,
B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1975, 16, 2521-2524. (b) Yamamoto, Y.; Yatagai,
H.; Maruyama, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 1969-1975. (c) Sasaki,
M.; Tanino, K.; Miyashita, M. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1765-1767.
9
1922 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 129, NO. 7, 2007