acetic acids. Quantum yields decreased on lowering the pH‡
which is consistent with the carboxylate form being reactive,
consistent with the latest findings for ketoprofen (1) reported by
Scaiano and co-workers.3a Furthermore, photolysis of 2 and 3 in
D2O–CH3CN (as above) gave exclusively the corresponding a-
deutero-methyl product, consistent with a carbanion inter-
mediate [eqn. (2)]. Interestingly, photolysis of acetophenone
derivative 5 gave two products in a 7+3 mole ratio (F for loss of
substrate ≈ 0.2), respectively [eqn. (3)]: the expected simple
decarboxylation product (p-methylacetophenone) via a simple
phenylmethyl carbanion and a ‘dimeric’ product formally
derivable from the phenylmethyl radical via coupling. Inde-
pendent photolysis of p-methylacetophenone under identical
conditions gave no reaction. Although radical coupling prod-
ucts have not been observed for ketoprofen (1) or from any of
2–4, the fact that it is observed for 5 indicates that a radical-type
mechanism (e.g. initial electron transfer from the carboxylate to
the ketone)3a–c cannot be excluded for the photodecarboxyla-
tion. The reactivity of acetophenone derivative 5 allows for
detailed investigations on this reaction pathway.
which would be required for deformylation via a carbanion
intermediate. These initial results suggest that the aroylphe-
nylmethyl group may be thought of as ‘photolabile’ carbanion
leaving group which is able to induce a variety of benzylic C–C
bond heterolysis in appropriately designed molecular systems.
This is akin to the nitrobenzyl group4 and selected diarylmethyl
systems5 that are known to have this ability.
In summary, we have shown that the photodecarboxylation of
aroyl and acetoyl-substituted phenylacetic acids is a general
reaction, all proceeding with high quantum yields. Less labile
‘leaving groups’ such as formaldehyde may also be used. In this
way, one may visualize the aroyl-substituted phenylmethyl
group to be a photolabile carbanion leaving group. This type of
general reactivity may have application in the design of photo-
labile protecting groups and other photochemical applications
in addition to providing new structural types for the elucidation
of detailed reaction mechanism.
We acknowledge the continued support of the Natural
Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of
Canada and the University of Victoria.
Notes and references
† All compounds had satisfactory H NMR (300 MHz) and mass spectral
1
data.
‡ We have preliminary results indicating that the meta isomer 2 becomes
increasingly more reactive at acidities greater than pH 2 (and into the
Hammett acidity region) suggesting that a new mechanism for photo-
decarboxylation is available for this compound in acid involving the acid
form.
(3)
The generally high reactivity towards photodecarboxylation
of the above aroyl (and acetoyl) substituted phenylacetic acids
prompted us to think about the possible driving force for these
reactions. A simple rationalization (assuming S1 reactivity) is
that the excited singlet states of these compounds have highly
polarized p electron densities, shifted towards the keto oxygen.
This would favour loss of CO2 via benzylic C–C bond
heterolysis, and subsequent generation of the carbanion. This
mechanism bypasses the need for an initial electron transfer
from the carboxylate oxygen to the carbonyl group, which
appears to be warranted only for 5. In any event, we wanted to
test the former proposal and have made derivative 6 to test
whether a similar reaction could operate using a much poorer
‘leaving group’, viz., formaldehyde, and a moiety incapable of
efficient electron transfer to the carbonyl group. To our surprise,
photolysis of 6 in 1+1 H2O–CH3CN gave the anticipated
deformylated product [p-methylbenzophenone (7)] although
with yields that are several fold (5–10%) less than observed for
the corresponding acid 2, along with what appears to be major
product(s) derived from photoreduction of the ketone. How-
ever, photolysis at pH 12 resulted in clean deformylation
( > 70% yield) consistent with a hydroxide ion catalyzed process
1 (a) D. Budac and P. Wan, J. Photochem. Photobiol., A, 1992, 67, 135; (b)
S. A Fleming and J. A. Pincock, Molecular and Supramolecular
Photochemistry, Vol. 3, V. Ramamurthy and K. Schanze, eds., M. Dekker
Inc., New York, 1999, p. 211.
2 L. L. Costanzo, D. DeGuidi, G. Conderelli, A. Cambria and M. Fama,
Photochem. Photobiol., 1989, 50, 359.
3 (a) G. Cosa, L. J. Martínez and J. C. Scaiano, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.,
1999, 1, 3533; (b) J. L. Martínez and J. C. Scaiano, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1997, 119, 11 066; (c) S. Monti, S. Sortino, G. De Guidi and G. Marconi,
J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans., 1997, 93, 2269; (d) S. Sortino and J. C.
Scaiano, Photochem. Photobiol., 1999, 69, 167; (e) F. Boscá and M. A.
Miranda, Photochem. Photobiol., 1999, 70, 853; (f) F. L. Cozens, W.
Ortiz and N. P. Schepp, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 13543; (g) T. M.
Bockman, S. M. Hubig and J. K. Kochi, J. Org. Chem., 1997, 62, 2210;
(h) H. Koshima, E. Hayashi, K. Shirafuji, M. Hamada, D. Matsushige, M.
Miyauchi and T. Matsuura, J. Photochem. Photobiol., A, 1999, 129, 121;
(i) H. Yokoi, T. Nakano, W. Fujita, K. Ishiguro and Y. Sawaki, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 12 453; (j) H. Görner and H. J. Kuhn, J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1999, 2671; (k) C. K. Lee and P. Wan,
J. Photochem. Photobiol., A, 1993, 76, 39.
4 P. Wan and S. Muralidharan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1988, 110, 4336.
5 E. Krogh and P. Wan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 114, 705.
2148
Chem. Commun., 2000, 2147–2148