dimethyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline (4),4 the isoquinoline
segment of the anti-HIV michellamines.5 These studies
revealed for the enantioselective synthesis of 1,3-disubstituted
isoquinolines that the addition of lateral lithiated o-tolunitriles
to sulfinimines is superior to the use of lateral lithiated
amides.
of 7 was complex because diastereomeric atropisomers were
formed due to restricted rotation about the amide C-N and
C-aryl bonds. Heating the NMR sample to ca. 90 °C failed
to resolve the spectra, so it was not possible to establish the
diastereoselectivity by this method. For the same reason,
analysis by HPLC also proved unsuccessful. Selective
removal of the sulfinyl group with TFA/MeOH gave amine
8 in 87% yield following flash chromatography. Attempts
to determine the enantiomeric purity of 8 by chiral HPLC,
using chiral shift reagents, and by making the Mosher amide
were also unsuccessful. However, chiral HPLC analysis of
9 (ChiralCel OD) indicated that the ee was 92%. Isoqui-
nolone 9 was prepared in 80% yield by cyclization of 8 with
tert-butyllithium at -78 °C.
Our first attempt at the construction of 4 is outlined in
Scheme 2 and involves generating the lateral lithiated amide
Scheme 2
With isoquinolone 9 in hand, our thought was to convert
it into the imidoyl chloride 10 followed by metal-catalyzed
coupling with methylmagnesium bromide to give dihydroiso-
quinoline 11.9 Stereoselective reduction of 11 would then
afford the target 4. Compound 9 was heated at reflux in
benzene with phosphorus oxychloride for 1.5 h, and purifica-
tion by alumina chromatography gave a 50% yield of the
hydrolytically unstable chloride 10 as indicated by the
disappearance of the amide proton. The catalyst [1,3-bis-
(diphenylphosphino)propane]dichloronickel(II) [NiCl2(dppp)]9a
was employed for coupling of 10 with methylmagnesium
bromide. Unfortunately, decomposition occurred on addition
of the Grignard reagent and none of the desired product could
be detected. It is interesting to note that in a model study
the imidoyl chloride of 3-phenyl-3,4-dihydro-2H-isoquinolin-
1-one (12)1 gave an 81% yield of 13 under similar conditions
(Scheme 3). The presence of the 8-methoxy group may
Scheme 3
of N,N-diethyl-2,4-dimethoxy-6-methylbenzamide (5)6,7 by
treatment with 2.0 equiv of LDA followed by addition of
(S)-(+)-(acetylidene)-p-toluenesulfinamide (6).8 The sulfin-
amide 7 was isolated in 68% yield by flash chromatography
and is assumed to have the (R)-configuration at the new
stereogenic center based on an empirical model developed
in our synthesis of 3 (see also below).1 The 1H NMR spectra
sterically inhibit the addition of the Grignard reagent and/or
may provide an unproductive site for coordination of the
catalyst.
Even if we had been successful in coupling the Grignard
reagent to the imidoyl chloride 10, the lateral lithiated amide
(7) Despite using normal precautions to exclude moisture and oxygen,
with an argon atmosphere about 10-15% N,N-diethyl-2-hydroxymethyl-
4,6-dimethoxybenzamide (i) was formed on generation of the lateral lithiated
amide of 5.
(4) For studies related to the synthesis of this isoquinoline and its epimers,
see: (a) Bringmann, G.; Jansen, J. R.; Rink, H.-P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl. 1986, 25, 913. (b) Bringmann, G.; Weirich, R.; Reuscher, H.; Jansen,
J. R.; Kinzinger, L.; Ortmann, T. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1993, 877 (c) Upender,
V.; Pollart, D. J.; Liu, J.; Hobbs, P. D.; Olsen, C.; Chao, W.-R.; Boden, B.;
Crase, J. L.; Thomas, D. W.; Padey, A.; Lawson, J. A.; Dawson, M. I. J.
Heterocycl. Chem. 1996, 33, 1371. (d) Hoye, T. R.; Chen, M. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1996, 37, 3099. (e) Hoye, T. R.; Chen, M.; Hoang, B.; Mi, L.; Priest,
O. P. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 7184.
(5) For a review, see: Bringmann, G.; Pokorny, F. The Naphthyliso-
quinoline Alkaloids. In The Alkaloids; Cordell, G. A., Ed.; Academic
Press: New York, 1995; Vol. 46, p 127.
(8) (a) Davis, F. A.; Zhang, Y. Andemichael, Y.; Fang, T.; Fanelli, D.
L.; Zhang, H. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 1043. (b) Fanelli, D. L.; Szewczyk,
J. M.; Zhang, Y.; Reddy, G. V.; Burns, D. M.; Davis, F. A. Org. Synth.
1999, 77, 50.
(6) Froyen, P. Synth. Commun. 1995, 25, 959.
3902
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 24, 2000