Table 1 Cross-coupling of bromobenzene and chlorobenzene with
malononitrile using Pd(dba)2 and imidazolium salts (1–6) in pyridine
Table 2 Cross-coupling of halides with malononitrile catalyzed by the
catalytic system of Pd(dba)2–imidazolium salts in pyridine
Imidazolium
salt
Isolated yields
(%)
Imidazolium
salt
Yield
(%)
Entry
X
Time/h
Entry
Ar
X
Time/h
1
2
3
4
5a
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13a
14
15
16
Br
Br
Br
Br
Br
Br
Br
Br
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
None
1
2
3
4
4
5
6
12
10
10
10
12
10
10
10
16
14
14
14
16
14
14
14
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
2-Me–C6H4
2-Me–C6H4
2-Me–C6H4
4-Me–C6H4
4-Me–C6H4
4-Me–C6H4
2-MeO–C6H4
2-MeO–C6H4
2-MeO–C6H4
4-MeO–C6H4
4-MeO–C6H4
4-MeO–C6H4
4-F–C6H4
Br
Br
Br
Br
Br
Br
Br
Br
Br
Br
Br
Br
Br
Br
Br
Br
Br
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
4
5
6
4
5
6
4
5
6
4
5
6
4
5
6
4
5
4
5
4
5
4
5
4
5
4
5
4
5
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
14
14
14
12
12
12
10
10
16
16
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
91
91
88
94
92
90
85
91
90
65
64
60
75
75
70
85
94
51
50
73
71
45
45
85
86
77
70
90
94
26
30
35
45
91
91
78
0
None
1
2
3
4
4
5
6
Trace
3
4
15
75
73
70
4-F–C6H4
4-F–C6H4
1-Naphthyl
1-Naphthyl
2-Me–C6H4
2-Me–C6H4
4-Me–C6H4
4-Me–C6H4
2-MeO–C6H4
2-MeO–C6H4
1-Naphthyl
1-Naphthyl
4-F3C–C6H4
4-F3C–C6H4–
4-Ph–C6H4
4-Ph–C6H4
a Refluxed in THF as solvent.
reaction conditions, the coupling only gave 45% yield for
bromobenzene, and 15% for chlorobenzene, respectively (Table
1, entry 5 and 13). Obviously, pyridine, as solvent, is not only
high efficient, but also has high recovery ( > 90%) after
distillation. Therefore, the high activity of this catalytic system
presumably results from the combination of strong electron-
donating ability with steric demands of the N-heterocyclic
carbene ligands as well as the effect of the solvents.
The coupling results of a number of aryl bromides and aryl
chlorides (Scheme 4) with malononitrile anion using the bulky
substituted imidazolium salts (4, 5 and 6) and Pd(0) as catalytic
systems are listed in Table 2. It can be seen from Table 2 that the
imidazolium chlorides 4 and 5 have similar high activity.
Because of its steric effects, the activity of the imidazolium
chloride 6 is a little bit lower.
As seen from Table 2, the bromine atom in the aryl bromides
could be smoothly substituted by a malononitrile group with
high efficiency, and the corresponding coupling products were
obtained in good yields of 64–94% (entries 1–17). For the
methoxybromobenzene substrates, when the methoxy group is
in the ortho-position, good coupling yields of 85–91% are
obtained (entries 7–9), while in the para-position the yields
decrease to 60–65% (entries 10–12). Generally, with imidazo-
lium salts 4, 5 and 6, most aryl bromides have high reaction
rates and higher coupling yields.
However when using aryl chlorides instead of aryl bromides
under the above conditions, the reaction became somewhat
difficult. When the amounts of Pd(dba)2 and imidazolium salts
are increased up to 50% with appropriate reaction time, the
coupling with aryl chlorides could be performed with good
results. For most aryl chlorides, the catalytic cross-coupling can
also proceed under these conditions; all substrates gave yields
from 45% to 94% (Table 2, entries 18–29). The 4A-biphenyl
chloride as substrate showed high activity and gave yields of
90% and 94% for imidazolium salts 4 and 5 (entries 28 and 29),
respectively. The steric and electronic effects of the substituent
groups on the aromatic rings were also observed in this case.
The electron-donating group, methoxy, in 2-methoxyphenyl
chlorides led to a sharp decrease in the yields (entries 22 and
23). Generally, the electron-withdrawing groups on aryl
chloride rings could promote the activity of the coupling
(entries 26 and 27).
Notes and references
1 J. Tsuji, Palladium Reagents and Catalysts, Wiley, Chichester, 1995; F.
Diederich and P. J. Stang, Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions,
Wiley, Weinheim, 1998; E. Negishi, Handbook of Organopalladium
Chemistry for Organic Synthesis, Wiley, New York, 2002.
2 W. A. Herrmann, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 1290; D. Bourissou,
O. Guerret, F. P. Gabbai and G. Bertrand, Chem. Rev., 2000, 100, 39; W.
A. Herrmann and C. Köcher, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1997, 36,
2162; M. Regitz, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1996, 35, 725.
3 K. Selvakumar, A. Zapf and M. Beller, Org. Lett., 2002, 4(18), 3031; C.
Yang, H. M. Lee and S. P. Nolan, Org. Lett., 2001, 3(10), 1511; V. P.
J. Böhm, C. W. K. Gsöttmayr, T. Weskamp and W. A. Herrmann, J.
Organomet. Chem, 2000, 596, 186; D. Enders and H. Gielen, J.
Organomet. Chem., 2001, 617–618, 70.
4 G. J. Quallich, T. W. Makoski, A. F. Sanders, F. J. Urban and E.
Vazquez, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 4116; M. A. Ciufolini and M. E.
Browne, Tetrahedron Lett., 1987, 28, 171.
5 S. A. Lang, F. M. Lovell and E. Cohen, J. Heterocycl. Chem., 1977, 14,
65; T. Hirayama, M. Kamada, H. Tsurimi and M. Mimura, Chem.
Pharm. Bull., 1976, 24, 26.
6 Y. Tsubata, T. Suzuki and T. Miyashi, J. Org. Chem., 1992, 57,
6749.
7 H. Suzuki, T. Kobayashi and A. Osuka, Chem. Lett., 1983, 589.
8 K. Okuro, M. Furuune, M. Miura and M. Nomura, J. Org. Chem., 1993,
58, 7606.
9 M. Uno, K. Seto, M. Masuda, W. Ueda and S. Takahashi, J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun., 1984, 932; M. Uno, K. Seto and S. Takahashi,
Tetrahedron Lett, 1985, 26, 1553.
10 T. Sakamoto, E. Katoh, Y. Kondo and H. Yamanaka, Chem. Pharm.
Bull., 1988, 36(5), 1664.
11 H. J Cristau, R. Vogel, M. Taillefer and A. Gadras, Tetrahedron Lett.,
2000, 41, 8457.
12 C. W. Gao, X. C. Tao, T. P. Liu, J. L. Huang and Y. Qian, Chin. J.
Chem., 2002, 20(9), 819.
Scheme 4
CHEM. COMMUN., 2003, 1444–1445
1445