3852
A. Stoncˇius et al. / Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 11 (2000) 3849–3853
Our first experiments of methyllithium addition to enoate 2 (Table 1, entries 5 and 6) showed
that the reaction is completely syn-selective, although disappointing in terms of both regioselec-
tivity and yield. Significant amounts of 1,2-addition, double 1,2-addition, 1,2-/1,4-addition
products were formed and considerable amounts of starting material were detected. The
repeated stepwise addition of MeLi and Me3SiCl significantly increased the formation of 5
(Table 1, entry 8). In this procedure only a part (1/4) of the complete quantity of MeLi was
added at once, where each addition step was followed by the addition of the equivalent quantity
of Me3SiCl. However, this procedure was too complicated for synthetic purposes. Our investiga-
tions showed that methyllithium preferably reacts with enoate 2 instead of Me3SiCl at the
reaction temperature (5−78°C) and nearly the same yield of 5 was obtained when Me3SiCl was
added before methyllithium. We also attempted to optimize the yield of syn-selective methyl-
lithium addition to 2 by reducing the coordinative capability of the solvent and by varying the
amount of Me3SiCl (Table 1, entries 9–11). Using t-BuOMe (entry 10) as the solvent leads to
nearly the same result as diethyl ether.12 Compound 5 was obtained in good yield using a
hexane/Et2O-mixture as solvent in the presence of Me3SiCl (Table 1, entry 11). Application of
a non-coordinating solvent enhances the coordinating influence of the dioxolane oxygen atoms
as 1,4-addition directing factor.
In conclusion, the addition of methylcopper reagents to 2 results in the formation of
anti-1,4-addition product 4 with medium to high diastereoselectivity. The syn-1,4-addition
product 5 was obtained exclusively by addition of MeLi to 2.
Acknowledgements
This project was funded by the Saxonian Ministry of Science and Culture, Dresden, by
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bonn (visiting grants to A.S.) and Fonds der Chemischen
Industrie, Frankfurt/Main, which are gratefully acknowledged.
References
1. Rossiter, B. E.; Swingle, N. M. Chem. Rev. 1992, 92, 771–806.
2. Yamamoto, Y.; Chounan, Y.; Nishii, S.; Ibuka, T.; Kitahara, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 7652–7660.
3. Dorigo, A. E.; Morokuma, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 6524–6536.
4. Mulzer, J.; Kappert, M.; Huttner, G.; Jibril, I. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1984, 96, 726–727; Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1984, 23, 704–705.
5. Sewald, N.; Hiller, K. D.; Ko¨rner, M.; Findeisen, M. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 7263–7274.
6. Leonard, J.; Mohialdin, S.; Reed, D.; Ryan, G.; Swain, P. A. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 12843–12858.
7. Becker, H.; Soler, M. A; Sharpless, K. B. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 1345–1376.
8. Barrett, A. G. M.; Doubleday, W. W.; Tustin, G. J. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 15325–15338.
9. To a suspension of dry CuI (1.50 mmol, 0.29 g) in 4 ml of dry ether under Ar at −78°C, MeLi (3.00 mmol, 1.88
ml of ꢀ1.6 M solution in ether) was added dropwise. The mixture was allowed to warm up to −10°C and stirred
at this temperature for an additional 30 min. The solution of Me2CuLi (1.50 mmol) was cooled to −78°C and
Me3SiCl (1.50 mmol, 0.16 g, 0.19 ml) was added dropwise. When ꢀ1/3 of Me3SiCl was added, a solution of
enoate 2 (1.00 mmol, 0.28 g) in ether (2 ml) was added. After additions were completed, the reaction mixture was
stirred for 1.5 h, then allowed to warm up to rt and stirred for an additional 2 h. It was quenched with satd aq.
NH4Cl/NH4OH (20:1, v/v). The organic phase was separated, the aqueous phase extracted with ether (4×20 ml),
dried over MgSO4 and evaporated. The residue was chromatographed, hexanes:EtOAc (8:1, v/v) and CHCl3 with
1
2% of EtOAc to give 0.21 g (72%) of 4 (ꢀ86% d.e.). [h]2D8 −0.95 (c 4.2, CHCl3). H NMR (CDCl3): 0.86 (d, 6.8,