KINETICS OF S-METHYL ARYL THIOCARBONATES
537
the concerted process as shown in the Scheme (Y ¼
2,4-(NO2)2, X ¼ S) for the following reasons: (i) If the
mechanism of this reaction were stepwise, the pKa0 value
would be ca. 4 (the pKa of 2,4-dinitrophenol). This is
due to the fact that there is no much difference between
the leaving abilities of 2,4-dinitrophenoxide and
2,4-dinitrobenzenethiolate from the anionic tetrahedral
intermediate.2a,4 The lack of a Brønsted break for the
benzenethiolysis of 2, covering a pKa range 2.7–6.4,
indicates that this mechanism is not stepwise. (ii) The
instability of the putative anionic tetrahedral intermediate
that would be formed if the reaction were stepwise would
be very high due to the great compression brought about
by the two sulfur atoms attached to the anionic tetrahedral
intermediate.
The value of the Brønsted slope for the benzenethio-
lysis of 1 (b ¼ 0.55) also suggests a concerted mechanism
(Scheme, Y ¼ 4-NO2, X ¼ S). This can be confirmed by
the following reasoning: If these mechanisms were
stepwise a Brønsted break at pK0a ca. 7 would be observed
(near the pKa of 4-nitrophenol, see discussion above).
Although this value is outside the pKa range of the
nucleophiles employed, it can be concluded that if the
break occurred at this pKa, the rate-determining step for
the experimental pKa range (2.7–6.4) would be the
breakdown of the putative Tꢁ to products. The value of
the Brønsted slope found (b ¼ 0.55) is too small
compared with those obtained for stepwise mechanisms
when breakdown of the anionic tetrahedral intermediate
is rate-limiting (b ¼ 0.8–1.1).2a,12
(3 and 4, respectively) are driven by a concerted
mechanism,5 as are the phenolyses of 1 and 2 (this
work). This indicates that substitution of SMe by OMe as
the ‘nonleaving’ group of the substrates does not change
the reaction mechanism.
Comparison of the nucleophilic rate constants (kN)
between the phenolysis of thiocarbonates 1 and 2 (this
work) and the phenolysis of the corresponding carbonates
(3 and 4),5 shows that the latter are more reactive (5 to
10-fold) toward phenoxides than thiocarbonates.
The higher reactivity of carbonates than thiocarbonates
toward phenoxide anions seems at first sight surprising in
view of the stronger electron-withdrawing effect of
SMe in a thiocarbonate compared to OMe in the
corresponding carbonate,14 which should result in the
carbonyl carbon of the thiocarbonate being more
positively charged and therefore more prone to nucleo-
philic attack by phenoxide, relative to carbonate. The
lower kN values for the phenolysis of thiocarbonates can
be attributed to steric hindrance toward phenoxide attack
by the bulkier sulfur atom in a thiocarbonate compared to
the oxygen atom in the corresponding carbonate. This is
also true when the S and O atoms are in the leaving group:
the nucleophilic rate constants (kN) for the phenolysis of
methyl aryl carbonates are larger than those of the
corresponding S-aryl thiocarbonates.3,5
Comparison of the nucleophilic rate constants for the
benzenethiolysis of 2 (this study) with those for the
corresponding carbonate (4)4 shows that the reactivities
of these compounds toward benzenethiolates are similar.
In view of the relative soft nature of benzenethiolates, it
should be expected a greater reactivity of these
nucleophiles toward the carbonyl group of thiocarbonate
2 compared with that of carbonate 4, since the carbonyl
group of a thiocarbonate should be softer than that of a
carbonate.13 Nevertheless, it is likely that this greater
affinity is counterbalanced by a greater steric hindrance,
toward the attack of benzenethiolate anion, of the sulfur
atom in 2, relative to oxygen in the corresponding
carbonate.
Phenolysis versus Thiolysis
Figure 1 shows a comparison of the Brønsted plots of the
nucleophilic rate constants for the benzenethiolysis and
phenolysis of thiocarbonates 1 and 2. It can be observed
that in both cases benzenethiolysis is faster than
phenolysis toward a carbonyl carbon within the pKa
range studied. A similar result was found in the same
reactions of 2,4-dinitrophenyl and 2,4,6-trinitrophenyl
methyl carbonates,4,5S-(2,4-dinitrophenyl) and S-(2,4,6-
trinitrophenyl) ethyl thiocarbonates,3,4 4-nitrophenyl
acetate2a and 4-nitrophenyl formate.2b This was explained
by the softer character of the sulfur nucleophile,
compared with the oxygen nucleophile, which favors
the binding of the former to the relatively soft carbonyl
carbon.13 This can be confirmed by the fact that
benzenenethiolates show an additional rate enhancement,
relative to isobasic phenoxide ions, toward 4-nitrophenyl
thiolacetate, which has a softer electrophilic group than
that of the corresponding carbonate.2a
CONCLUSIONS
The reactions of S-methyl 4-nitrophenyl thiocarbonate
(1), and S-methyl 2,4-dinitrophenyl thiocarbonate (2)
with a series of phenols and benzenethiols are studied
kinetically in water. The Brønsted slopes, together with
other evidence suggest a concerted mechanism for these
reactions.
By the comparison of the kinetics and mechanisms of
these reactions with those of similar reactions, the
following conclusions arise: (i) Thiocarbonates 1 and 2
react with phenoxide and benzenethiolate ions through
concerted mechanisms. (ii) Substitution of OMe in
carbonates by SMe as the nonleaving group does not
affect the mechanism. (iii) Benzenethiolates are more
Carbonates vs. Thiocarbonates
It has been found that the phenolyses of methyl
4-nitrophenyl and methyl 2,4-dinitrophenyl carbonates
Copyright # 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2007; 20: 533–538
DOI: 10.1002/poc