1966
B. Štefane et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 53 (2012) 1964–1967
8-aminoquinoline product 7a resulting from the nucleophilic dis-
placement of the cyanomethoxy group by pyrrolidine (Scheme 3). It
is worth mentioning that a reverse approach, the reaction of
7-aminomethylated nitroxoline with bromoacetonitrile, was not
successful.
significantly lower isolated yield of product 7g (55%) (Table 1, en-
tries 4–7). Piperidines 6h and 6i containing either amide or ester
functional groups afforded the 8-aminoquinolines 7h and 7i in
modest yields; 4-methylpiperidine, on the other hand, gave a much
higher yield of the amino product 7j (Table 1, entries 8–10). Sur-
prisingly, the reaction of 2 with pyridin-2-ylmethanamine (6k)
led to the product 7k in a disappointing isolated yield of 32% after
chromatographic purification (Table 1, entry 11). Although the
cyanomethoxy group could depart as formaldehyde and cyanide
ion, following the reaction by NMR spectroscopy we were not able
to detect such species [CAUTION!].18
In conclusion, we have demonstrated for the first time that a
cyanomethoxy group can serve as a good leaving group in nucleo-
philic aromatic substitution in a quinoline system. The microwave-
assisted displacement of the cyanomethoxy group of 8-cyano-
methoxy-5-nitroquinoline (2) by various primary and secondary
amines provided selectively the corresponding 8-quinolylamines
in moderate-to-high yields. Our methodology provides rapid ac-
cess to various 8-amino analogues of pharmacologically interesting
nitroxoline.
Quinolines bearing good leaving groups, such as halo-, meth-
oxy- or sulfonyloxy- are known to undergo aromatic nucleophilic
substitution with sulfur,10 oxygen,10c and nitrogen10c,11 nucleophiles.
Due to the very common presence of arylamine moieties in phar-
maceutically relevant compounds,2 methods for the amination of
(hetero)aromatics are of significant utility. It was reported that
the 8-dimethylamino group in highly activated 5,7-bis(trifluoro-
acetyl)quinoline could be replaced by various amines to afford
the desired 8-quinolylamines.12 Quinolylmethylamines were also
prepared by the oxidative methylamination of nitroquinolines,
but the method was rather unselective.13 On the other hand, the
Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling of 5- and 8-quinolyl halides and dif-
ferent amines (Buchwald–Hartwig reaction) provided efficiently
the corresponding 5- and 8-quinolylamines.14 To the best of our
knowledge, there are no examples of the cyanomethoxy group
acting as a leaving group in aromatic nucleophilic substitutions.
Thus, we focused our attention on the synthesis of 8-amino-5-
nitroquinoline derivatives 7, which actually represents the amino
analogues of nitroxoline, in order to take advantage of the displace-
ment of the cyanomethoxy group of quinoline 2 by nitrogen nucle-
ophiles. After optimization, the reaction of 2 with a large excess
(10 equiv) of pyrrolidine or morpholine in refluxing ethanol for
20 h afforded the products 7a and 7b in 88% and 85% yields,
respectively (Table 1, entries 1 and 2). While the reaction of 2 with
prop-2-yn-1-amine (6c) failed to provide the desired product 7c
under conventional heating for 20 h, substitution of the cyano-
Acknowledgments
The Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Technology of
the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovenian Research Agency (P1-
0230-0103) are gratefully acknowledged for their financial sup-
port. The study was performed and financed as a part of the
EN–FIST Centre of Excellence.
Supplementary data
methoxy group occurred with the use of microwave (lW) condi-
Supplementary data (synthetic procedures, spectroscopic and
analytical data for all compounds) associated with this article
tions. Thus, a fifteen-minute irradiation (power level 80 W) of an
ethanolic solution of quinoline 2 and five equivalents of amine 6c
provided N-(prop-2-ynyl)quinolin-8-amine 7c in a 54% isolated
yield (Table 1, entry 3). While the application of microwaves has
received much attention in organic synthesis,15 only a few exam-
ples of nucleophilic substitution in quinoline systems using micro-
wave irradiation have been described.10c,16 This encouraging result
prompted us to investigate the microwave-promoted nucleophilic
substitution reaction further.
In order to choose an appropriate solvent, the microwave-as-
sisted reaction of quinoline 2 and N-benzylmethylamine (6d) was
examined using CD3OD, DMSO-d6, and CD3CN as solvents, respec-
tively, at 100 °C (150 W) for 20 min. The crude product mixtures
were investigated by 1H NMR spectroscopy, which revealed that
the reaction in deuterated acetonitrile resulted in the formation
of the product 7d solely, whereas in methanol-d4 an unidentified
by-product was formed. In DMSO-d6, however, the quinoline 2
was not totally consumed. Therefore, acetonitrile was chosen as
the solvent for this reaction.
References and notes
1. (a) Anzali, S.; Barnickel, G.; Cezanne, B.; Krug, M.; Filimonov, D.; Poroikov, V. J.
Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 2432–2437; (b) Eicher, T.; Hauptmann, S. The Chemistry of
Heterocycles; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2003. pp 316–336; (c) Sashidhara, K. V.;
Kumar, A.; Bhatia, G.; Khan, M. M.; Khanna, A. K.; Saxena, J. K. Eur. J. Med. Chem.
2009, 44, 1813–1818.
2. (a) Kaur, K.; Jain, M.; Reddy, R. P.; Jain, R. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 45, 3245–
3264; (b) Kaur, K.; Jain, M.; Khan, S. I.; Jacob, M. R.; Tekwani, B. L.; Singh, S.;
Singh, P. P.; Jain, R. Med. Chem. Commun. 2011, 2, 300–307.
3. (a) Yamato, M.; Hashigaki, K.; Yasumoto, Y.; Sakai, J.; Tsukagoshi, S.; Tashiro, T.;
Tsuruo, T. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1986, 34, 3496–3498; (b) Jampilek, J.; Dolezal, M.;
Kunes, J.; Buchta, V.; Kralova, K. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 1, 591–599; (c) Moret, V.;
Laras, Y.; Cresteil, T.; Aubert, G.; Ping, D. Q.; Di, C.; Barthélémy-Requin, M.;
Béclin, C.; Peyrot, V.; Allegro, D.; Rolland, A.; De Angelis, F.; Gatti, E.; Pierre, P.;
Pasquini, L.; Petrucci, E.; Testa, U.; Kraus, J.-L. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 44, 558–
567.
4. Pelletier, C.; Prognon, P.; Bourlioux, P. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1995, 39,
707–713.
The microwave-assisted nucleophilic substitution reaction of
8-cyanomethoxy-5-nitroquinoline (2) was carried out with a num-
ber of primary and secondary aliphatic as well as alicyclic amines 6
giving the corresponding 8-aminoquinoline derivatives 7 in rea-
sonable yields (Table 1).
´
ˇ
5. Mirkovic, B.; Renko, M.; Turk, S.; Sosic, I.; Jevnikar, Z.; Obermajer, N.; Turk, D.;
Gobec, S.; Kos, J. ChemMedChem 2011, 6, 1351–1356.
6. (a) Shim, J. S.; Matsui, Y.; Bhat, S.; Nacev, B. A.; Xu, J.; Bhang, H. C.; Dhara, S.;
Han, K. C.; Chong, C. R.; Pomper, M. G.; So, A.; Liu, J. O. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2010,
102, 1855–1873; (b) Jian, H.; Taggart, J. E.; Zhang, X.; Benbrook, D. M.; Lind, S.
E.; Ding, W.-Q. Cancer Lett. 2011, 312, 11–17.
7. Shaw, A. Y.; Chang, C.-Y.; Hsu, M.-Y.; Lu, P.-J.; Yang, C.-N.; Chen, H.-L.; Lo, C.-W.;
Shiau, C.-W.; Chern, M.-K. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 45, 2860–2867.
8. Fleming, F. F.; Yao, L.; Ravikumar, P. C.; Funk, L.; Shook, B. C. J. Med. Chem. 2010,
53, 7902–7917.
9. (a) Greenspan, P. D.; Clark, K. L.; Tommasi, R. A.; Cowen, S. D.; McQuire, L. W.;
Farley, D. L.; van Duzer, J. H.; Goldberg, R. L.; Zhou, H.; Du, Z.; Fitt, J. J.; Coppa, D.
E.; Fang, Z.; Macchia, W.; Zhu, L.; Capparelli, M. P.; Goldstein, R.; Wigg, A. M.;
Doughty, J. R.; Bohacek, R. S.; Knap, A. K. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 4524–4534; (b)
Altman, E.; Aichholz, R.; Betschart, C.; Buhl, T.; Green, J.; Lattmann, R.;
Missbach, M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16, 2549–2554; (c) Löser, R.;
Schilling, K.; Dimmg, E.; Gütschow, M. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 7688–7707.
10. (a) Zawistoski, M. P. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1991, 28, 657–665; (b) Clavier, S.; Rist,
Ø.; Hansen, S.; Gerlach, L.-O.; Högberg, T.; Bergman, J. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003,
In a typical procedure,17 a mixture of quinoline substrate 2 and
three equivalents of an appropriate amine was subjected to micro-
wave irradiation (150 W) at 100 °C in acetonitrile for the indicated
time. When the syntheses of 7a and 7b were performed under
microwave conditions, not only was the reaction accelerated (1
vs 20 h), but also, a smaller excess of amine was required (3 vs
10 equiv) compared to standard heating. The isolated yields, how-
ever, were comparable (Table 1, entries 1 and 2). While the yields
of the products 7d–f derived from secondary aliphatic amines 6d–f
were high (81–87%), the primary amine benzylamine (6g) gave a