4
We also investigated the mechanism of inhibition by
compound 6e (Fig. S2 and Fig. S3 in supplementary material).15
A competitive inhibition of the ChT-L activity was observed.15
This indicates that inhibitor 6e binds exclusively to the free
enzyme with an inhibition constant Ki = 19 ± 1 µM. Such a
competitive inhibition mechanism has been reported mainly for
the ChT-L activity of non-covalent peptide derivatives16 and also
for the PA activity of tamoxifen derivatives.17 The PA activity
was inhibited non-competitively.15 Inhibitor 6e binds with an
equal affinity to the enzyme alone or the enzyme in complex with
the substrate (Ki = K’i = 13.2 ± 0.6 µM). Non-competitive
inhibition of 20S proteasome has been observed for the PA
activity of quinoline 5-AHQ (Fig.1),3f and for the ChT-L activity
of oxadiazoles,9a tamoxifen derivatives17 or peptide
derivatives.16a,18
References and notes
[1] (a) Solomon, V. R.; Lee, H. Curr. Med. Chem. 2011, 18,
1488-1508;
(b) Musiol, R. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2017, 12, 583-
597.
[2] (a) Manasanch, E. E.; Orlowski, R. Z. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol.
2017, 14, 417;
(b) Park, J. E.; Miller, Z.; Jun, Y.; Lee, W.; Kim, K. B.
Translational Research 2018, 198, 1-16.
[3] (a) Perez, C.; Li, J.; Parlati, F.; Rouffet, M.; Ma, Y.;
Mackinnon, A. L.; Chou, T.-F.; Deshaies, R. J.; Cohen, S.
M. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 60, 1343-1361;
(b) Pajonk, F.; Himmelsbach, J.; Riess, K.; Sommer, A.;
McBride, W. H. Cancer Res. 2002, 62, 5230-5235;
(c) Mao, X.; Li, X.; Sprangers, R.; Wang, X.; Venugopal,
A.; Wood, T.; Zhang, Y.; Kuntz, D. A.; Coe, E.; Trudel, S.;
Rose, D.; Batey, R. A.; Kay, L. E.; Schimmer, A. D.
Leukemia 2009, 23, 585-590;
(d) Zhai, S.; Yang, L.; Cui, Q. C.; Sun, Y.; Dou, Q. P.; Yan,
B. JBIC, J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 15, 259-269;
(e) Ruschak, A. M.; Kay, L. E. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S.
A. 2012, 109, E3454-E3462, SE3454/1-SE3454/31;
(f) Li, X.; Wood, T. E.; Sprangers, R.; Jansen, G.; Franke,
N. E.; Mao, X.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Verbrugge, S. E.;
Adomat, H.; Li, Z. H.; Trudel, S.; Chen, C.; Religa, T. L.;
Jamal, N.; Messner, H.; Cloos, J.; Rose, D. R.; Navon, A.;
Guns, E.; Batey, R. A.; Kay, L. E.; Schimmer, A. D. J. Natl.
Cancer Inst. 2010, 102, 1069-1082;
(g) Pundir, S.; Vu, H.-Y.; Solomon, V. R.; McClure, R.;
Lee, H. Cancer Research 2015, 75, 4164-4175;
(h) Basse, N.; Montes, M.; Marechal, X.; Qin, L.; Bouvier-
Durand, M.; Genin, E.; Vidal, J.; Villoutreix, B. O.;
Reboud-Ravaux, M. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 509-513;
(i) Di Giovanni, C.; Ettari, R.; Sarno, S.; Rotondo, A.; Bitto,
A.; Squadrito, F.; Altavilla, D.; Schirmeister, T.; Novellino,
E.; Grasso, S.; Zappala, M.; Lavecchia, A. Eur. J. Med.
Chem. 2016, 121, 578-591;
Fig.3 Effect of 3-(quinazol-2-yl)-quinolines 6-15 on human constitutive CP
(pH 8, 37 °C). Compared inhibitions of the ChT-L, PA and T-L activities by
compounds 6-15 at 50 µM.
The many crystallographic structures of inhibitors in complex
with 20S proteasome have provided a deep understanding of the
binding channel and specificity pockets that can be targeted by
competitive inhibitors.19 However a non-competitive modulation
of 20S proteasome suggests that binding to other sites could
occur while blocking 20S proteasome activities. As yet, the only
direct evidences (NMR3e or X-ray20) for such a mechanism
involving non-peptide derivatives have been brought using
quinoline derivatives (respectively chloroquine or I).
(j) McDaniel, T. J.; Lansdell, T. A.; Dissanayake, A. A.;
Azevedo, L. M.; Claes, J.; Odom, A. L.; Tepe, J. J. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. 2016, 24, 2441-2450.
[4] Alagarsamy, V.; Chitra, K.; Saravanan, G.; Solomon, V. R.;
Sulthana, M. T.; Narendhar, B. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018,
151, 628-685.
[5] Chen, J.; Natte, K.; Neumann, H.; Wu, X.-F. RSC Adv.
2014, 4, 56502-56505.
[6] Sutherland, H. S.; Hwang, I. Y.; Marshall, E. S.; Lindsay, B.
S.; Denny, W. A.; Gilchrist, C.; Joseph, W. R.; Greenhalgh,
D.; Richardson, E.; Kestell, P.; Ding, A.; Baguley, B. C.
Invest New Drugs 2012, 30, 2035-45.
[7] Derabli, C.; Boulcina, R.; Kirsch, G.; Carboni, B.; Debache,
A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014, 55, 200-204.
We described in this paper an efficient synthesis of poly-
substituted 3-(quinazol-2-yl)-quinoline derivatives 6-15 in few
steps and high yields. Chemical diversity was introduced by
selective mono or double SNAr of a range of phenols, thiophenol,
amines or anilines with the easily prepared di-chloro derivatives
5. Aryl or heteroaryl carbon nucleophiles allowed the AlCl3
mediated and controlled creation of one or two C-C bonds.
Several 3-(quinazol-2-yl)-quinoline derivatives inhibited the
ChT-L and PA activities of the human constitutive 20S
proteasome. The best compound 6e inhibited these activities by
different mechanisms, with moderate affinities (Ki = 13-19 µM).
[8] (a) Mahdjoub, S.; Boulcina, R.; Yildirim, M.; Lakehal, S.;
Boulebd, H.; Debache, A. Synth. Commun. 2018, 48, 2366-
2381;
Acknowledgments
(b) Derabli, C.; Boualia, I.; Abdelwahab, A. B.; Boulcina,
R.; Bensouici, C.; Kirsch, G.; Debache, A. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 2018, 28, 2481-2484;
(c) Derabli, C.; Boulcina, R.; Kirsch, G.; Debache, A.
Tetrahedron 2017, 73, 351-358.
This work was supported by the University of Rennes 1 and
the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS). IB
gratefully acknowledges le Ministère de l’Enseignement
Supérieur et de la Recherche Scientifique (Algeria) and The
Algerian-French scholarship program PROFAS B+.
[9] (a) Maréchal, X.; Genin, E.; Qin, L.; Sperandio, O.; Montes,
M.; Basse, N.; Richy, N.; Miteva, M. A.; Reboud-Ravaux,
M.; Vidal, J.; Villoutreix, B. O. Curr. Med. Chem. 2013, 20,
2351-2362;
(b) Villoutreix, B. O.; Khatib, A. M.; Cheng, Y.; Miteva, M.
A.; Marechal, X.; Vidal, J.; Reboud-Ravaux, M. Oncotarget
2017, 8, 10437-10449.
Supplementary Material
[10] CCDC 1871916 contains the crystallographic data for
compounds 6b.These data can be obtained free of charge
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at