and did not introduce byproducts that are difficult to remove.
After simple workup, analogue 1a was obtained in 94%
yield; the second analogue, the corresponding sulfoxide 1b,
was synthesized by oxidation of 1a with Bu4NIO4 in 86%
yield.
Scheme 7a
Incorporation of the glycine moiety into the upper chain
in intermediate 2 is depicted in Scheme 6. Reductive
Scheme 6a
a (a) 1. R ) Me: formaldehyde (37% in H2O), NaCNBH3,
MeOH, 98%; 2. R ) Ac: Ac2O, Et3N, DMAP, CH2Cl2, 99%; 3. R
) Ms: Ms2O, Et3N, CH2Cl2, 93%; (b) H2SiF6, CH3CN; (c) 1,4-
cyclohexadiene, 10% Pd/C, EtOH.
a (a) NH2CH2CO2Bn‚HCl, Et3N, NaCNBH3, MeOH, rt; (b)
H2SiF6, CH3CN, rt; (c) 1,4-cyclohexadiene, 10% Pd/C, EtOH, rt.
conditions. In a manner identical to that described in Scheme
6, two deprotection steps led to analogues 1d-f in excellent
yields.
A two-step sequence was used to synthesize the N-benzyl-
protected analogue 1g (Scheme 8). Treatment of aldehyde
amination of aldehyde 11 with glycine benzyl ester using
NaCNBH3 in the presence of Et3N provided 12 in 66% yield.
Aldehyde 11 was available from the standard Swern oxida-
tion of alcohol 9. A key requirement for the success of this
reductive amination reaction was that an equimolar amount
of Et3N and glycine ester hydrochloride salt be premixed
with the aldehyde in MeOH prior to the addition of
NaCNBH3. Without the presence of Et3N, the corresponding
dimethyl ketal of aldehyde 11 was the sole product recovered.
With H2SiF6, three TBS groups were removed in quantitative
yield and subsequent catalytic transfer hydrogenation15
quantitatively afforded analogue 1c.
Scheme 8a
The syntheses of analogues incorporating various substit-
uents at the secondary amine in compound 1c started with
intermediate 12 (Scheme 7). For the synthesis of the
N-methyl derivative, reductive amination was used to
introduce the N-methyl substitution. The Ac2O/Et3N/DMAP
combination was used to install the N-acetyl group. The
mesyl group was introduced with Ms2O/Et3N under standard
a (a) BnNHCH2CO2H‚HCl, NaCNBH3, Et3N, MeOH-Et2O, rt;
(13) Optical and spectral data for 2: colorless oil, [R]23D ) 11.1 (c 3.2,
CHCl3); 1H NMR(CDCl3) δ 7.35-7.25 (m, 7H), 6.96-6.86 (m, 3H), 4.50
(s, 2H), 4.08-4.03 (m, 1H), 4.01-3.95 (m, 1H), 3.86-3.74 (m, 3H), 3.49-
3.44 (m, 2H), 2.16-2.07 (m, 1H), 1.77-1.21 (m, 13H), 0.9 (s, 9H), 0.88
(s, 9H), 0.87 (s, 9H), 0.11 (s, 3H), 0.09 (s, 3H), 0.04 (s, 6H), 0.02 (s, 3H),
0.01 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 158.50, 138.66, 129.36, 128.29, 127.54,
127.39, 120.49, 114.28, 76.80, 72.80, 71.94, 71.62, 71.39, 70.58, 49.77,
47.91, 44.50, 31.63, 30.21, 27.21, 26.65, 25.93, 25.86, 25.83, 24.48, 18.18,
18.00, 17.85, -4.07, -4.19, -4.23, -4.68, -4.79, -5.10; HRMS calcd
for C44H78O5Si3, (M+) 770.5157, (M - C4H9) 713.4453, found 713.4455.
(14) Pilcher, A. S.; Hill, D. K.; Shimshock, S. J.; Waltermire, R. E.;
DeShong, P. J. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 2492..
(b) H2SiF6, CH3CN, rt.
11 with N-benzylglycine using NaCNBH3 in the presence
of Et3N gave 15 in 56% yield. Deprotection of 15 using H2-
SiF6 in CH3CN afforded the target compound 1g in 95%
yield.
The receptor binding affinities of these saturated PG
analogues, 1a-g, were then measured by their abilities to
displace various radiolabeled PG ligands in COS-7 cells
(15) Felix, A. M.; Heimer, E. P.; Lambros, T. J.; Tzougraki, C.;
Meienhofer, J. J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43, 4194.
Org. Lett., Vol. 3, No. 5, 2001
793