[Cl(dppe)2Ru–C·C–C·C–CHPh2] 6 (58%) shows the unknown
electrophilic character of the Ce atom. The fact that 7 is not
observed in the free radical trapping experiment with H· is very
promising, suggesting the location of the radical on the Ce atom
in 3 and the higher selectivity of radical addition vs. nucleo-
philic attack.
This last observation associated with cyclic voltammetry,
trapping experiments and EPR spectroscopy re-enforces the
conclusion that the reduction of Ru(II) allenylidene or pentate-
traenylidene generate radical species located on the termini of
the cumulene chain that can be written as shown in Scheme 1.
More detailed investigations are in progress, including the study
of the striking difference in selectivity between reduction/
radical trapping and nucleophilic attack on the pentate-
traenylidene complex and the potential of cumulenylidene in
radical chemistry.
We thank the CNRS and the Université de Rennes for
support, P. Guénot from the Centre de Mesures Physiques de
l’Ouest and F. Monnier for assistance.
Scheme 1
are resolved only in the case of 1 and 2. The EPR spectrum of
2 gave a poorly resolved quintet [Fig. 2(b)] showing the
Notes and references
1 M. I. Bruce, Chem. Rev., 1991, 91, 197.
hyperfine coupling with the four phosphorus nuclei with aP
=
2 J. P. Selegue, Organometallics, 1982, 1, 217.
3.0 G. For compound 1, the EPR spectrum is complex [Fig.
2(a)]. This could be best rationalized by the coupling of the
unpaired electron with the four phosphorus nuclei on one hand
and further coupling with the ortho, meta and para hydrogens of
the phenyl group of the carbon-rich bridge. These results
suggest that the radical is centered on the organic bridges in 1,
2, 3 and is stabilized by delocalization along the two
neighbouring phenyl rings in 1. In the case of 2, identification of
such a radical neighbouring methyl groups is quite unexpected.
These EPR data added to the trapping experiments indicate the
organic nature of radicals 1, 2 and 3 and show that the radical
stabilization on the cumulene chain takes place at the trisub-
stituted carbon atom and thus is not controlled by the presence
of a heteroatom bonded to the unsaturated chain.8
3 H. Werner, Chem. Commun., 1997, 903; M. I. Bruce, Chem. Rev., 1998,
98, 2797.
4 D. Touchard and P. H. Dixneuf, Coord. Chem. Rev., 1998, 178–180,
409.
5 M. Tamm, T. Jentzsh and W. Werncke, Organometallics, 1997, 16,
1418; G. Roth, H. Fischer, T. Meyer-Friedrichsen, J. Heck, S.
Houbrechts and A. Persoons, Organometallics, 1998, 17, 1511.
6 A. Furstner, M. Picquet, C. Bruneau and P. H. Dixneuf, Chem.
Commun., 1998, 1315; M. Picquet, C. Bruneau and P. H. Dixneuf,
Chem. Commun., 1998, 2249; A. Furstner, A. F. Hill, M. Liebl and
J. D. E. T. Wilton-Ely, Chem. Commun., 1999, 615; M. Picquet, D.
Touchard, C. Bruneau and P. H. Dixneuf, New J. Chem., 2000, 24, 141;
D. Sémeril, J. Le Nôtre, C. Bruneau, P. H. Dixneuf, A. F. Kolomiets and
S. N. Osipov, New J. Chem., 2000, 25, 16
7 V. Amir-Ebrahimi, J. G. Hamilton, J. Nelson, J. J. Rooney, J. M.
Thompson, A. J. Beaumon, A. D. Rooney and C. J. Harding, Chem.
Commun., 1999, 1621.
8 R. F. Winter, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 1999, 2121.
9 (a) D. Touchard, P. Haquette, A. Daridor, A. Romero and P. H. Dixneuf,
Organometallics, 1998, 17, 3844; (b) D. Touchard, N. Pirio and P. H.
Dixneuf, Organometallics, 1995, 14, 4920.
10 D. Touchard, P. Haquette, A. Daridor, L. Toupet and P. H. Dixneuf,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, 116, 11 157.
11 These results are in agreement with previous theoretical studies on
analogous allenylidene [(C5H5)(CO)(PPh3)RuNCNCNCH2]+ and
[(C9H7)(PPh3)2RuNCNCNCH2]+ suggesting that the LUMO is strongly
located on the cumulenic ligand. See: (a) M. A. Esteruelas, A. V.
Gomez, A. Lopez, J. Modrego and E. Oñate, Organometallics, 1997, 16,
5826; (b) V. Cadierno, M. P. Gamasa, J. Gimeno, M. González-Cueva,
E. Lastra, J. Borge, S. García-Granda and E. Pérez-Carreño, Organome-
tallics, 1996, 15, 2137.
12 (a) N. G. Connelly and W. E. Geiger, Chem. Rev., 1996, 96, 877;
(b) J. H. Ameter and J. D. Swallen, J. Phys. Chem., 1972, 57, 678.
13 (a) D. D. Tanner, G. E. Diaz and A. Potter, J. Org. Chem., 1985, 50,
2149; (b) K. J. Covert, P. T. Wolczanski, S. A. Hill and P. J. Krusic,
Inorg. Chem., 1992, 31, 66.
14 (a) The irreversibility of the reduction wave of 2+ was also observed in
THF at room temperature and at low temperature (230 °C). (b) Many
organometallic species are known to undergo reductive coupling
reactions via radical intermediates. For examples see: ref. 13(b); Z. Hou,
A. Fujita, H. Yamazaki and Y. Wakatsuki, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996,
118, 7843; E. J. Roskamp and S. F. Pedersen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1987,
109, 3152. However, in the present reaction we have observed that
evolution of 2 led to a mixture of products. The two main compounds
have been identified as 5 and [Cl(dppe)2Ru–C·C–C(NCH2)CH3],
certainly result from an intermolecular hydrogen abstraction [such an
intermolecular abstraction reaction has already been reported for ketyl
radicals, see ref. 13(b).
Fig. 2 EPR spectra resulting from reduction of (a) 1+, g = 2.0042; (b) 2+,
g = 2.0097.
The synthesis of complexes 4–6 were achieved on successive
addition to the cumulene chain of one electron and one
hydrogen atom. This led us to study the reactivity difference
with the simultaneous addition, i.e. the nucleophilic addition, of
H2. Nucleophiles are susceptible to attack either the Ca or the
Cg atom of an allenylidene ligand,3,11a but using the bulky
phosphines additions only occur on Cg.9b Reductions were
performed using NaBH4 in THF (Scheme 1). As expected for 1+
and 2+, additions of H2 take place at the Cg carbons yielding the
acetylide compounds [Cl(dppe)2Ru–C·C–CHPh2]
4 and
[Cl(dppe)2Ru–C·C–CHMe2] 5. When complex 3+ was re-
duced, a mixture of two compounds was obtained. The presence
1
of [Cl(dppe)2Ru–C·C–CHNCNCPh2] 7 (42% estimated by H
NMR), which displays a 13C NMR signal at d 216.7 character-
istic for the cumulenic carbon (CNCNC),† is consistent with the
electrophilicity of carbon Cg in 3+.10 The main product
374
Chem. Commun., 2001, 373–374