Inorganic Chemistry
Forum Article
homogeneous catalytic systems. The aforementioned limita-
tions significantly circumscribe the usage of molecular
complexes for triggering water splitting on an industrial scale.
For this reason, incorporating molecular complexes into
practical catalysis should be considered to be operated in
aqueous mixtures and heterogeneous conditions.
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
■
General Materials and Methods. All chemicals were purchased
from Strem, Sigma. or Alfa Aesar without further purification. Three
dinuclear complexes, [Dy2(hmb)2(OAc)4]·MeCN (3·MeCN),
[Dy2(hmi)2(OAc)2(MeOH)2]·H2O (4·H2O), and [Dy2(hb)2(μ-OA-
c)2(OAc)2(H2O)2]·DMF·H2O (5·DMF·H2O), and their ligands were
prepared as described in the literature.29
Another strategy is to introduce molecular cocatalysts, such
as pyridine base additives, that have been characteristic for
enhancing the catalytic activity and product selectivity in many
homogeneous catalytic systems.17,18 For example, cocatalysts,
such as 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine (DMAP) and bis-
(triphenylphosphine)iminium chloride ([PPN]Cl), in combi-
nation with different metal complexes for promoting catalysis
have been revealed.19,20 The principles to improve heteroge-
neous catalysis have also been adopted by a polycrystalline
metal electrode in electrochemical heterogeneous catalysis,
which further facilitated the product formation occurring in the
heterogeneous case.21,22 This observation clearly confirms the
fact that organic additives on film electrodes can be expected
to significantly effect their catalytic activity in heterogeneous
catalysis. However, the polycrystalline metal system in the
literature was shown to have difficulty determining their active
sites as well as actual TOF values. Furthermore, mechanistic
studies on such thin-film systems are very challenging because
the outermost atoms may display a behavior significantly
different from that of their subsurface region (i.e., bulk
region).23 One possible solution to overcoming these problems
is operating molecular complexes on a heterogeneous support
to further clarify the correlation between the cocatalyst
behavior and catalytic enhancement. On the other hand, the
stability of the molecular complex is another critical issue for
OER because the molecular complexes may have a high affinity
for decomposing and further forming the corresponding metal
oxides in aqueous solution under anodic potential.24 This
implies that the only solution for developing such a system is
to realize a robust molecular complex in heterogeneous
catalytic conditions.
Recently, the usage of rare-earth/lanthanide complexes as
catalysts in both organic reactions25,26 and polymerization
processes27,28 has attracted increasing attention. In previous
work, lanthanide-based complexes containing Schiff-base
ligands have been utilized for triggering CO2/epoxide
copolymerization, in which all dinuclear dysprosium complexes
are air-insensitive molecules and highly active in such a
homogeneous catalytic system.29 Indeed, heterogeneous
catalysis based on air-stable lanthanide complexes is relative
rare, especially for electrochemical water oxidation and
reduction. Therefore, it is highly desired to investigate the
synergy caused by cocatalysts on the lanthanide complex family
for heterogeneous catalysis because of their structural diversity,
air/moisture insensitivity, and easy preparation under an air
atmosphere. Herein, two mononuclear and three dinuclear
dysprosium complexes with a series of Schiff-base ligands have
been used for heterogeneous oxygen evolution. Remarkably, a
correlation between the organic additives and OER over-
potential has been revealed, in which the [Dy2(hmb)2(OAc)4]·
MeCN complex can display the best performance toward
heterogeneous water oxidation. We also noted that this
heterogenized molecular catalyst could retain its molecular
nature for long-term electrochemical catalysis, as confirmed by
in situ Raman spectroscopy.
Synthesis of H-hdni. 3,5-Dinitro-2-hydroxybenzaldehyde30 (20
mmol, 4.24 g) and isonicotinohydrazide (20 mmol, 2.74 g) were
dissolved in 300 mL of methanol in a 500 mL round-bottom flask and
refluxed for 18 h, yielding a white precipitate. The product was then
filtered, washed with methanol and ether, and dried with a vacuum
system to obtain 5.62 g of H-hdni (yield: 85%). 1H NMR (400 MHz,
DMSO-d6): δ 8.84 (d, 2H), 8.81 (d, 2H), 7.95 (d, 2H).
Synthesis of H-hdmob. 3-Methoxy-5-nitrobenzaldehyde31 (20
mmol, 3.94g) and benzohydrazide (20 mmol, 2.72 g) were dissolved
in 300 mL of methanol in a 500 mL round-bottom flask and refluxed
for 18 h, yielding a pale-yellow precipitate. The product was then
filtered, washed with methanol, and dried with a vacuum system to
obtain 5.67 g of H-hdmob (yield: 90%). 1H NMR (400 MHz,
DMSO-d6): δ 8.84 (d, 2H), 8.81 (d, 2H), 7.95 (d, 2H).
Synthesis of Complexes 1 and 2. Synthesis of [Dy(hmnob)-
(H2O)2(NO3)2]·MeCN·H2O (1·MeCN·H2O). To a solution of Dy-
(NO3)3·5H2O (0.25 mmol, 0.1096 g) in methanol (15 mL) was
added a solution of H-hdmob (0.25 mmol 0.0828 g) and pyridine
(0.020 mL, 0.25 mmol) in methanol (15 mL). Bright-yellow crystals
of the mononuclear complex 1·MeCN·H2O yielded from the resulting
bright-yellow solution in 33.7% (0.0296 g) yield after 2 weeks. IR
(KBr, cm−1): 3344 (br), 2266 (m), 1603 (s), 1568 (s), 1505 (w),
1484 (m), 1455 (m), 1391 (w), 1300 (s), 1260 (s), 1251 (m), 1187
(w), 1117 (m), 1097 (w), 1026 (m), 971 (m), 896 (m), 845 (m), 815
(m), 781 (w), 744 (s), 717 (s), 660 (w). Anal. Calcd for 1·MeOH·
OH−: C, 29.3; H, 3.18; N, 12.06. Found: C, 29.28; H, 3.15; N, 12.05.
Synthesis of [Dy(hdni)2(MeOH)2]·MeOH·OH− (2·MeOH·OH−). To
a solution of Dy(NO3)3·5H2O (0.25 mmol, 0.1096 g) in methanol
(15 mL) was added a solution of H-hdni (0.25 mmol 0.0828 g) and
pyridine (0.020 mL, 0.25 mmol) in methanol (15 mL). The resulting
yellow solution yielded yellow crystals of the mononuclear complex 2·
2MeOH in 24.5% (0.0232 g) yield after 2 weeks. IR (KBr, cm−1):
3749 (s), 2988 (s), 2869 (s), 2283 (w), 1613 (m), 1560 (m), 1489
(w), 1412 (w), 1394 (m), 1305 (s), 1233 (m), 1186 (w), 1143 (w),
1102 (w), 1071 (m), 1105 (m), 925 (w), 907 (w), 840 (m), 811 (w),
787 (w), 746 (m), 717 (s), 687 (w). Anal. Calcd for 2·MeOH·OH−:
C, 31.67; H, 3.65; N, 7.35. Found: C, 31.50; H, 3.65; N, 7.30. CCDC
Crystallographic Studies. Single crystals of complexes 1 and 2
suitable for X-ray diffraction measurements were mounted on a
Bruker D8 VENTURE diffractometer. The unit cell was determined
using the Bruker SMART APEX 3 software suite to employ graphite-
monochromated Mo Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å), and the intensity
data were collected with ω scans. Data collection and reduction were
performed with the CrysAlisPro software, and the absorptions were
corrected by the SCALE3 ABSPACK multiscan method. The space
group determination was based on the symmetry and the systematic
absences displayed in the diffraction pattern. The structure was solved
and refined with the Olex2 1.2-ac21 package. Anisotropic thermal
parameters were used for all non-H atoms, and fixed isotropic
parameters were used for H atoms.
Electrode Fabrication. Complexes 3−5 (9.296 × 10−2 mmol each)
were dispersed in 5 mL of tetrahydrofuran, and complexes 1 and 2
(1.859 × 10−1 mmol each) were dispersed in 5 mL of ethanol. The
mixture was treated by ultrasound for at least 30 min, and then 20 μL
of the suspension was dropped onto carbon paper (C.P.) within an
area of 0.5 × 0.5 cm, followed by 20 μL of a 0.1 wt % Nafion solution
after the previous layer was dried under ambient air. The 0.1 wt %
Nafion solution was diluted from a commercial Nafion perfluorinated
resin solution (5 wt %, Sigma) by ethanol. Finally, the mole density of
the Dy ion on the electrode was 2.975 × 10−3 mmol cm−2. For
B
Inorg. Chem. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX