J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 6431-6432
One-Electron Reduction of an Antiferromagnetically
6431
Coupled Triradical Yields a Mixed-Valent Biradical
with Enhanced Ferromagnetic Coupling
David A. Shultz* and R. Krishna Kumar
Department of Chemistry
North Carolina State UniVersity
Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-8204
ReceiVed March 9, 2001
A variety of molecule-based magnetic materials1,2 has been
prepared in which the primary structural element is a high-spin
(S g 1) organic molecule.3-7 The most common high-spin
molecule design is to attach paramagnetic functional groups to a
π-system8,9 (a Coupler) to form a cross-conjugated, nondisjoint10
spin system. For example, the structural features of trimethylene-
methane and m-xylylene form the basis of a multitude of high-
spin molecules.6,9,11 However, since the beginning of high-spin
organic molecule research no new molecular design paradigm
has been proposed.
Certain mixed-valent metal complexes exhibit a spin-spin
coupling mechanism for which there is no organic counterpart:
double exchange, also called spin-dependent delocalization
(SDD).2 The salient feature of SDD is that the highest spin-
multiplicity state is lowest energy. An organic system that exhibits
true SDD may be difficult to design, but exchange-coupled,
mixed-valent organic species are not difficult to design. Despite
this fact, only a few examples of such species have been reported,
none of which relate either new coupling pathways or enhanced
ferromagnetic coupling.12-14 From these reports it appears that
mixed valency does not offer new possibilities for designing high-
spin organic molecules.
Nevertheless, we believe that there are opportunities, and to
begin our search for new design principles based on mixed
valency, we desired a three-spin system featuring an inherently
weak antiferromagnetic Coupler. We suspected that the effects
of mixed valency might be modest and difficult to observe in a
strongly coupled system. Moreover, we wanted to discover
enhanced ferromagnetic coupling as a consequence of mixed
valency. Herein we report the first example of enhanced ferro-
magnetic coupling in a mixed-valent molecule that lacks an
effective π-type ferromagnetic Coupler ([Na+][(LZn)3(SQ2Cat)]-),
formed from one-electron reduction of an antiferromagnetically
coupled triradical, (LZn)3(SQ3).15
Figure 1. 77 K EPR spectra (inserts show ∆ms g 2 transitions) for (a)
(LZn)3(SQ3), (b) incompletely oxidized reaction mixture containing a
large mole fraction of (LZn)3(SQ2HCat), (c) [Na+][(LZn)3(SQ2Cat)]-.
Asterisks (*) denote biradical species. All samples were ca. 10 mM
solutions in 2-MTHF. See Table 1 for zero-field splitting parameters.
Table 1. Zero-Field Splitting Parameters for Triradical and
Biradicalsa
complex
(LZn)3(SQ3)
|D/hc|/cm-1
0.00854
0.01417
0.01215
|E/hc|/cm-1
0
(LZn)3(SQ2HCat)
0.00108
0.00058
[Na+][(LZn)3(SQ2Cat)]-
a ZFS parameters determined by spectral simulation.17,20
As shown in Figure 1a, the triradical exhibits an axial quartet
powder EPR spectrum18,19 at 77 K in 2-methyltetrahydrofuran (2-
MTHF). Also visible are ∆ms ) 2 (with fine structure), and ∆ms
) 3 transitions, confirming the existence of the quartet state. The
∆ms ) 1 region was simulated17,20 to provide zero-field splitting
parameters, |D/hc| ) 0.00854 cm-1, and |E/hc| ) 0 cm-1 (see
also Table 1).
Figure 2a shows the EPR Curie plot for the triradical. Assuming
a Boltzmann distribution of spin states and regular-triangular21
coupling, the data were fit according to the expression:
4 exp(3J/kT)
C
T
Iquartet
)
[
]
4 + 4 exp(3J/kT)
The fit parameters give J ) -18 cm-1; that is, for (LZn)3(SQ3)
the three spins are antiferromagnetically coupled. This was both
desired and expected since (LZn)3(SQ3) lacks an effective
ferromagnetic Coupler.8,9
To demonstrate intrinsic antiferromagnetic coupling within this
molecular framework, we examined the spin-spin coupling in
the localized biradical, (LZn)3(SQ2HCat). If the oxidation
(9) Rajca, A. Chem. ReV. 1994, 94, 871.
(10) Borden, W. T.; Davidson, E. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 4587.
(11) Berson, J. A. Diradicals; Wiley: New York, 1982.
(12) Nakamura, T.; Momose, T.; Shida, T.; Kinoshita, T.; Takui, T.; Teki,
Y.; Itoh, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 11292.
(13) Rajca, S.; Rajca, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 9172.
(14) Sedo´, J.; Ruiz, D.; VidalGancedo, J.; Rovira, C. J.; Bonvoisin, J.;
Launay, J. P.; Veciana, J. AdV. Mater. 1996, 8, 748.
(15) L ) hydrotris[3-(4′-chlorophenyl)-5-methylpyrazolyl]borate.
(16) Ruf, M.; Noll, B. C.; Groner, M. D.; Yee, G. T.; Pierpont, C. G. Inorg.
Chem. 1997, 36, 4860.
(17) See Supporting Information for synthetic details, electrochemistry, and
EPR simulations.
(18) Weltner, W., Jr. Magnetic Atoms and Molecules; Dover Publications:
New York, 1983.
Complex (LZn)3(SQ3) was prepared from the corresponding
tris(catechol) using methodology first reported by Pierpont.16,17
(1) Lahti, P. M. Magnetic Properties of Organic Materials; Marcel
Dekker: New York, 1999.
(2) Kahn, O. Molecular Magnetism; VCH: New York, 1993.
(3) Caneschi, A.; Gatteschi, D.; Sessoli, R.; Rey, P. Acc. Chem. Res. 1989,
22, 392.
(4) Miller, J. S.; Calabrese, J. C.; McLean, R. S.; Epstein, A. J. AdV. Mater.
1992, 4, 498.
(5) Luneau, D.; Laugier, J.; Rey, P.; Ulrich, G.; Ziessel, R.; Legoll, P.;
Drillon, M. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1994, 741.
(6) Iwamura, H.; Inoue, K.; Haymizu, T. Pure Appl. Chem. 1996, 68, 243.
(7) Shultz, D. A.; Bodnar, S. H.; Kumar, R. K.; Kampf, J. W. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1999, 121, 10664.
(19) Signals marked with an * in the EPR spectrum are for two different
S ) 1 species: (LZn)3(SQ2HCat) and [M+][(LZn)3(SQ2Cat)]-, see text.
(20) Bru¨ker WINEPR SimFonia; 1.25, Shareware Version; Bru¨ker Ana-
lytische Messtechnik GmbH: Karlsruhe, Germany, 1996.
(21) Kanno, F.; Inoue, K.; Koga, N.; Iwamura, H. J. Phys. Chem. 1993,
97, 13267.
(8) Dougherty, D. A. Acc. Chem. Res. 1991, 24, 88.
10.1021/ja010630g CCC: $20.00 © 2001 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 06/08/2001