3824
Inorg. Chem. 2001, 40, 3824-3826
Notes
Experimental Section
Synthesis and Characterization of
Cyclopentadienyl Titanium(Aryloxide)Sulfide
Complexes
General Data. All preparations were done under an atmosphere of
dry, O2-free N2, employing both Schlenk line techniques and inert
atmosphere gloveboxes. Solvents were purified using a Grubb’s type
column system. All organic reagents were purified by conventional
1
methods. H and13C{1H} NMR spectra were recorded in C6D6 on a
Eva Witt and Douglas W. Stephan*
Bruker Avance-300 and -500, operating at 300 and 500 MHz,
respectively. Trace amounts of protonated solvents were used as
references, and chemical shifts are reported relative to SiMe4. Guelph
Chemical Laboratories Inc. of Guelph, Ontario performed combustion
analyses. Li2S was purchased from the Aldrich Chemical Co. The
complexes (η5-C5H5)Ti(OR)Cl2 (R ) C6H3-2,6-Me2 1; C6H3-i-Pr2 2)
and (η5-C5Me5)Ti(OR)Cl2 (R ) C6H3-2,6-Me2 3, C6H3-i-Pr2 4, C6H3-
2,6-t-Bu2 5) were prepared as described in the literature.17,21
School of Physical Sciences, Chemistry and Biochemistry,
University of Windsor, Windsor, ON Canada N9B 3P4
ReceiVed October 16, 2000
We have been interested in the fundamental nature of the
reactivity of early metal-sulfur bonds for some time.1,2
A
Synthesis [(η5-C5H5)Ti(OC6H3-2,6-Me2)(µ-S)]2 6, [(η5-C5Me5)Ti-
(OC6H3-2,6-Me2)(µ-S)]2 7. These compounds were prepared in a
similar fashion. To a solution of 2 (100 mg, 0.28 mmol) in THF was
added Li2S (25 mg, 0.55 mmol). Upon stirring overnight, the solution
became brown. The THF was removed in vacuo, and the product was
extracted into benzene, filtered, and the solvent removed to give a brown
precipitate. 6. Yield: 50%. 1H NMR δ: 2.33 (s, 6H, Me), 6.23 (s, 5H,
(η5-C5H5)), 6.85 (m, 1H, p-Ar), 7.03 (d, 2H, m-Ar). Anal. Calcd for
C13H14STiO: C, 58.66; H: 5.30. Found: C, 58.21; H: 5.07. 7. Yield:
variety of group four metal sulfide derivatives are known,3
including mono and dimetallic compounds such as (η5-C5-
5
H5)2TiS5,4 1,5-((η5-C5H5)2Ti)2S6, and 1,4-((η5-C5H5)2Ti)2S4 , as
well as the higher nuclearity aggregates [(η5-C5H5)TiS]4,6 (η5-
C5H5)5Ti5S6,77 Zr3S3(t-BuS)2(BH4)4(THF)2, Zr6S6(t-BuS)4(BH4)8-
(THF)2,8,9 Zr3S(S-t-Bu)10,10 ((η5-C5H5)Ti)4(µ3-S)3(µ2-S)(µ2-
SEt)2, ((η5-C5H5)Ti)6(µ3-S)4(µ3-O)4, and [(η5-C5H5)Ti(OC6H3-
2,6-i-Pr2)(µ3-S)]3Ti(η5-C5H5).11 In contrast, group four complexes
containing terminal-sulfido ligands are much less common,
being limited to [Ti(S)Cl4],2-12 (η5-C5Me5)2M(S)py (M ) Ti,
Zr, Hf),13,14 [(η5-C5H5)Ti(µ-S)(S)]2,2-15 and (PhC(NSiMe3)2))2-
Ti(S)py.16 In our own work, we have been exploring the effects
of bulky aryloxide ligands in Ti-sulfide chemistry.17-20 We
have previously reported dimetallic sulfide bridged complexes
of the form [(η5-C5H5)Ti(OC6H3-2,6-i-Pr2)(µ-S)]2 and [(η5-
C5H5)Ti(OC6H3-2,6-i-Pr2)]2(µ-S)(µ-S2).18 In the present work,
we probe several strategies in quest of titanium-terminal-sulfide
complexes.
1
45%. H NMR δ: 1.90 (s, 3H, Me), 1.92 (s, 3H, Me), 2.38 (s, 15H,
(η5-C5Me5)), 6.67 (tr, 1H, p-Ar), 7.04 (d, 2H, m-Ar). Anal. Calcd for
C18H24STiO: C, 64.28; H: 7.19. Found: C, 64.11; H, 7.01.
Synthesis of (η5-C5Me5)Ti(S)(OR)‚LiCl‚2,2′-bipy, R ) (C6H3-2,6-
Me2) 8, (C6H3-2,6-i-Pr2) 9. A solution of 4 (0.50 g, 1.16 mmol), Li2S
(0.10 g, 2.18 mmol), and 2,2′-bipyridine (0.181 g, 1.16 mmol) in THF
(5 mL) was allowed to stir for 2 days. The solvent was removed and
the residue extracted into benzene; the solution was filtered and allowed
to stand. Light-brown X-ray quality crystals of 9 were deposited in
91% yield. 8. 1H NMR δ: 1.91 (s, 3H, Me), 1.93 (s, 3H, Me), 2.40 (s,
15H, (η5-C5Me5)), 6.01 (br, 2H, bipy), 6.60 (m, 2H, bipy), 6.90 (m,
3H, Ar), 7.40 (m, 2H, bipy), 8.90 (m, 2H, bipy). Anal. Calcd for C28H32-
ClLiN2STiO: C, 62.92; H, 5.99; N, 5.24; Found: C, 62.71; H, 5.84;
* To whom communication should be addressed.
(1) Stephan, D. W. Coord. Chem. ReV. 1989, 95, 41.
(2) Nadasdi, T. T.; Stephan, D. W. Coord. Chem. ReV. 1996, 147, 147.
(3) Draganjac, M.; Rauchfuss, T. B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1985,
24, 742.
(4) Muller, E. G.; Petersen, J. L.; Dahl, L. F. J. Organomet. Chem. 1976,
111, 91.
(5) Bollnger, C. M.; Hoots, J. E.; Rauchfuss, T. B. Organometallics 1982,
1, 223.
(6) Bottomley, F.; Keizer, P. N.; White, P. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988,
110, 141.
1
N, 5.09. 9. Yield: 96%. H NMR δ: 1.43 (d, 6H, |JHH| ) 6.8 Hz,
CH(CH3)2), 1.49 (d, 6H, |JHH| ) 6.8 Hz, CH(CH3)2), 2.39 (s, 15H,
C5Me5), 4.11 (sept, 2H, IJHH| ) 6.8 Hz, CH(CH3)2), 6.45 (dd, 2H, bipy),
6.90 (trd, 2H, bipy), 7.06 (tr, 1H, |JHH| ) 7.5 Hz, p-Ar), 7.16 (d, 2H,
m-Ar), 7.29 (d, 2H, bipy), 8.29 (d, 2H, bipy). 13C{1H}-NMR δ: 13.3
(C5Me5), 24.8 (CH(CH3)2), 25.3 (CH(CH3)2), 26.0 (CH(CH3)2), 119.8
(Ar), 120.4 (Ar), 123.7 (Bipy), 123.9 (C5Me5), 124.3 (Bipy), 137.7
(Bipy), 137.9 (o-Ar), 150.2 (Bipy), 154.0 (Bipy), 161.6 (ipso-Ar). Anal.
Calcd for C32H40ClLiN2STiO: C, 65.03; H, 6.82; N, 4.74. Found: C,
64.81; H, 6.54; N, 4.39.
(7) Bottomley, F.; Egharevba, G. O.; White, P. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985,
107, 4353.
Generation of (η5-C5Me5)Ti(S)(OC6H3-2,6-i-Pr2)(THF) (10) and
Benzo-15-crown-5‚LiCl To a 5 mL THF solution of 4 (0.200 g, 0.46
mmol) was added Li2S (0.04 g, 0.87 mmol) and benzo-15-crown-5
(0.124 g, 0.46 mmol). This was allowed to stir for 2 days. The THF
was removed in vacuo, and the residue was extracted in benzene and
filtered. The extreme sensitivity and propensity for dimerization of this
compound precluded isolation, EA, and spectroscopic characterization
(8) Coucouvanis, D.; Lester, R. K.; Kanatzidis, M. G.; Kessissoglou, D.
P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 8279.
(9) Coucouvanis, D.; Hadjikyriacou, A.; Lester, R.; Kanatzidis, M. G.
Inorg. Chem. 1994, 33, 3645.
(10) Coucouvanis, D.; Hadjikyriacou, A.; Kanatzidis, M. G. Chem. Com-
mun. 1985, 018, 1224.
(11) Firth, A. V.; Stephan, D. W. Inorg. Chem. 1997, 36, 1260.
(12) Muller, U.; Krug, V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1988, 27, 293.
(13) Sweeney, Z. K.; Polse, J. L.; Andersen, R. A.; Bergman, R. G.;
Kubinec, M. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 4543.
(14) Howard, W.; Trnka, T. M.; Waters, M.; Parkin, G. J. Organomet.
Chem. 1997, 528, 95.
(15) Lundmark, P. J.; Kubas, G. J.; Scott, B. L. Organometallics 1996,
15, 3631.
(16) Hagadorn, J. R.; Arnold, J. Inorg. Chem. 1997, 36, 2928.
(17) Firth, A. V.; Stephan, D. W. Organometallics 1997, 16, 2183.
(18) Firth, A. V.; Stephan, D. W. Inorg. Chem. 1998, 37, 4726.
(19) Firth, A. V.; Stephan, D. W. Inorg. Chem. 1998, 37, 4732.
(20) Firth, A. V.; Witt, E.; Stephan, D. W. Organometallics 1998, 17, 3716.
1
beyond NMR methods. H NMR(C6D6) δ: 1.41 (d, 6H, |JHH| ) 6.8
Hz, CH(CH3)2), 1.45 (d, 6H, |JHH| ) 6.8 Hz, CH(CH3)2), 2.36 (s, 15H,
(η5-C5Me5)), 3.16 (br, 4H, CH2), 3.40 (br, 12H, CH2), 3.56 (m, THF),
4.21 (2H, 2H, |JHH| ) 6.8 Hz, CH(CH3)2), 6.34 (dd, 2H, Ar, crown),
6.73 (dd, 2H, Ar, crown), 6.90 (tr, 1H, p-Ar), 7.20 (d, 2H, m-Ar). 13C-
{1H}-NMR(C6D6) δ: 13.8 C5Me5, 25.0 (CH(CH3)2), 26.1 (CH(CH3)2),
(21) Fussing, I. M. M.; Pletcher, D.; Whitby, R. J. Organomet. Chem. 1994,
470, 109.
10.1021/ic001139d CCC: $20.00 © 2001 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 06/14/2001