Organic Letters
Letter
a
Scheme 1. First-Row Transition-Metal-Catalyzed C−H
Functionalization with Arylsilanes
Table 1. Optimization of the Reaction Conditions
b
entry
catalyst
additive
solvent
yield
c
1
Co(OAc)2
Co(OAc)2
Co(OAc)2
Co(OAc)2
Co(OAc)2
CoCl2
KF
CsF
AgF
DCE
DCE
DCE
DCE
DCE
DCE
DCE
DCE
DCE
THF
toluene
PhCl
xylene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
<5
<5
<5
0
11
0
c
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
c
d
TBAF
CuF2
CuF2
CuF2
CuF2
CuF2
CuF2
CuF2
CuF2
CuF2
CuF2
CuF2
CuF2
CuF2
CoBr2
0
Co(acac)2
Co(acac)3
Co(acac)3
Co(acac)3
Co(acac)3
Co(acac)3
Co(acac)3
Co(acac)3
Co(acac)3
−
13
15
21
46
43
43
56
67
79
0
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
transition-metal catalysis as a viable alternative are highly
desirable for mitigating industrial costs and environmental
impacts.
e
e
e
e
,
,
,
f
f
f
,
g
g
To exploit the full potential of cost-effective cobalt catalysis,
we report herein the cobalt-catalyzed chelation-assisted C−H
arylation of indoles and pyrroles with sterically and electroni-
cally diverse (hetero)arylsilanes (Scheme 1). This cobalt-based
strategy features a broad substrate scope and excellent
functional group compatibility, which would effectively
complement the precious transition-metal-mediated Hiyama-
type processes and also significantly contribute to improving
the sustainability of organosilicon reagents in the field of C−H
functionalization chemistry.15
Our studies began with screening conditions for direct
C(sp2)−H arylation of readily prepared N-(2-pyrimidyl)indole
1a. After extensive efforts, we found that the treatment of 1a
with 3.0 equiv of trimethoxyphenylsilane 2a in the presence of
20 mol % Co(OAc)2 and 3.0 equiv of CuF2 (in 1,2-DCE at
140 °C under air for 24 h) gave the coupling product 3a in
11% yield (Table 1, entry 5). Other fluorides such as KF, CsF,
AgF, or TBAF were ineffective in activating the C−Si bond
and facilitating the transmetalation from silicon to cobalt
catalyst in this transformation (Table 1, entries 1−4). The
nature of the cobalt catalyst could significantly affect the
efficiency of the reaction, and commercially available Co-
(acac)3 was found to be the best choice, albeit in 15% yield
(Table 1, entry 9). A subsequent evaluation of different
solvents revealed that toluene was the optimal solvent to afford
the product in 46% yield (Table 1, entry 11). Furthermore,
increasing the reaction temperature to 160 °C resulted in the
formation of product 3a in 56% yield (Table 1, entry 14). The
optimal result was achieved when the reaction was conducted
in toluene (0.5 mL) under O2 (1.0 atm), with a 79% isolated
yield (Table 1, entry 16). As expected, a control experiment
demonstrated that reaction of 1a with 2a in the absence of a
cobalt catalyst failed to deliver the desired coupling product
(Table 1, entry 17).
,
a
Reaction conditions: 1a (0.2 mmol), 2a (0.6 mmol, 3.0 equiv), Co
catalyst (0.04 mmol, 20 mol %), additive (0.6 mmol, 3.0 equiv),
b
c
solvent (2.0 mL), at 140 °C for 24 h. Isolated yield. Mn(OAc)2·
4H2O (0.6 mmol, 3.0 equiv) was added as the oxidant. TBAF (1.0
mol/L in THF). At 160 °C. Under O2 (1.0 atm). Solvent (0.5 mL).
d
e
f
g
proceeded smoothly to deliver the corresponding products in
yields from 65% to 73% (3m−3p). Moreover, substituents at
the ortho position of the substrates did not affect the efficiency
of this process (3q−3t). Naphthylsilanes proved to be
favorable coupling partners, leading to products 3u and 3v in
68% and 64% yields, respectively. Notably, a broad range of di-
and trisubstituted arylsilanes participated well in this trans-
formation under the optimal conditions (2w−2an), whereas
sterically congested mesityltrimethoxysilane 2ao resulted in a
moderate yield (46%). It is particularly noteworthy that this
cobalt-based strategy is also compatible with various
heteroarylsilanes, enabling the formation of desired products
3ap−3au in synthetically acceptable yields (44−66%).
To further extend this strategy, the scope of this Hiyama-
type C−H arylation with respect to (hetero)arenes was next
investigated (Scheme 3). In general, a broad range of indole
substrates bearing diverse functional groups were well tolerated
with the optimal conditions to deliver the corresponding
products (4b−4ag). Specifically, substrates with substituents at
position 3 reacted smoothly to furnish arylation products 4b−
4e in high yields (71−81%); substituents at position 7 of
indoles diminished the efficiency of the reaction, and the
products were obtained in moderate yields (49−57%). The
arylation reaction tolerates sensitive halide functional handles
such as fluoro (4f and 4v), chloro (4c and 4n), bromo (4h, 4o,
and 4x), and iodo (4p), enabling this methodology orthogonal
to the traditional cross-coupling reactions. In particular,
synthetically useful functional groups such as cyano (4d, 4i,
4u, and 4z) and ester (4e, 4m, 4aa, and 4ad) were well
accommodated with the typical conditions without any
compromise. Disubstituted indoles reacted uneventfully to
produce products 4ae−4ag in 64−70% yields. Additionally,
pyrrole substrates 1ah−1aj also proved to be viable substrates
With the optimized conditions established, the substrate
scope of this cobalt-catalyzed C−H Hiyama cross-coupling was
evaluated.16 As shown in Scheme 2, a variety of arylsilanes
bearing both electron-donating and -withdrawing functional
groups at the para position could successfully give the desired
coupling products (3b−3l) in moderate to good yields (52−
82%). The reaction of meta-substituted arylsilanes with 2a
B
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX