SPECIAL TOPIC
Conventional and Tandem Hydroformylation
2899
uene (2 mL) was placed in a 45 mL autoclave. The autoclave was
flushed three times with CO and pressurized to 700 psi of CO and
then 300 psi of H2. The autoclave was then placed in an oil bath pre-
set to 120 °C on a stirring hot plate. The total pressure increased to
1200 psi. After 48 h, the autoclave was removed from the oil bath
and cooled to r.t. prior to the release of excess CO. The solvent was
concentrated and the residue was purified by silica gel chromatog-
raphy with a mixture of hexane and EtOAc (9:1) as the eluent to af-
ford the desired products.
The reaction mixture was concentrated and the residue was subject-
ed to flash chromatography using the indicated eluent.
(3R,7aS)-3-Phenylhexahydropyrrolo[2,1-b]oxazole (20a)18
Purification by flash chromatography with 20% of EtOAc in hex-
anes used as eluent provided the title compound in 87% yield;
[a]D22 –95.3 (c = 1.29, CHCl3).
1H NMR (400 MHz, C6D6): d = 1.5 (m, 1 H), 1.7 (m, 2 H), 1.9 (m,
1 H), 2.5 (dt, J = 9.8, 6.9 Hz, 1 H), 2.9 (dt, J = 9.7, 6.3 Hz, 1 H), 3.5
(dd, J = 7.6, 8.1 Hz, 1 H), 3.8 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1 H), 4.1 (dd, J = 7.9,
6.8 Hz, 1 H), 5.0 (dd, J = 5.1, 1.9 Hz, 1 H), 7.1 (tt, J = 7.3, 2.0 Hz,
1 H), 7.2 (m, 2 H), 7.3 (m, 2 H).
4-Methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinoline (15a)16
Purification by flash chromatography provided the title compound
in 89% yield.
1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d = 1.28 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3 H), 1.62–
1.72 (m, 1 H), 1.92–2.02 (m, 1 H), 2.85–2.96 (m, 1 H), 3.21–3.35
(m, 2 H), 3.82 (br s, 1 H), 6.45–6.65 (m, 2 H), 6.93–7.06 (m, 2 H).
13C NMR (101 MHz, C6D6): d = 24.2, 31.9, 55.4, 70.1, 73.7, 98.9,
126.9, 127.1, 128.6, 143.2.
HRMS: m/z calcd for C12H15NO: 189.1154; found: 189.1132.
13C NMR (75.4 MHz, CDCl3): d = 22.7, 29.9, 30.3, 39.0, 114.2,
117.0, 126.6, 126.8, 128.5, 144.3.
Acknowledgment
Hydroaminomethylation of 16a–c;17 Method A; General Proce-
dure
The work carried out by the authors of this manuscript benefited
from generous support by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Re-
search Council of Canada and by Sasol Technology.
A glass liner, equipped with a magnetic stirring bar, containing the
benzylamine 16a–c (0.50 mmol), catalyst 1 (7.5 mol%), and toluene
(2.5 mL) was placed in a 45 mL autoclave. The autoclave was
flushed three times with CO and pressurized to 700 psi of CO and
then 100 psi of H2. The autoclave was then placed in an oil bath pre-
set to 120 °C on a stirring hot plate. The total pressure increased to
1200 psi. After 48 h, the autoclave was removed from the oil bath
and cooled to r.t. prior to the release of excess CO. The solvent was
concentrated and the residue was purified by silica gel chromatog-
raphy with a mixture of hexane and EtOAc (9:1) as the eluent to af-
ford the desired products.
References
(1) (a) Roelen, O. Patent DE 849548, 1938/1952. (b) Frohning,
C. D.; Kohlpainter, C. W. In Applied Homogeneous
Catalysis with Organometallic Compounds, Vol. 1; Cornils,
B.; Herrmann, W. A., Eds.; VCH: Weinheim, 1996, 29.
(c) Kalck, P.; Peres, Y.; Jenck, J. Adv. Organomet. Chem.
1991, 32, 121.
(2) (a) Weissermel, K.; Arpe, H.-J. Industrial Organic
Chemistry, 4th ed.; VCH: Weinheim, 2003, 127. (b) Breit,
B. Top. Curr. Chem. 2007, 279, 139.
(3) Rhodium Catalysed Hydroformylation; van Leeuwen, P. W.
N. M.; Claver, C., Eds.; Kluwer Academic: Dordrecht, 2000.
(4) (a) Nozaki, K.; Sakai, N.; Nanno, T.; Higashijima, T.; Mano,
S.; Horiuchi, T.; Takaya, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119,
4413. (b) Klosin, J.; Landis, C. R. Acc. Chem. Res. 2007, 40,
1251.
(5) Kim, J. J.; Alper, H. Chem. Commun. 2005, 3059.
(6) Park, H. S.; Alberico, E.; Alper, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999,
121, 11697.
(7) (a) De Vos, D. E.; Dams, M.; Sels, B. F.; Jacobs, P. A. Chem.
Rev. 2002, 102, 3615. (b) Heterogeneous Catalysis in
Organic Chemistry; Smith, G. V.; Notheisz, F., Eds.;
Academic Press: San Diego, 1999. (c) Clean Synthesis
Using Porous Inorganic Solid Catalysts and Supported
Reagents; Clark, J. H.; Rhodes, C. N., Eds.; Royal Society of
Chemistry: Cambridge, 2000. (d) Fine Chemicals Through
Heterogeneous Catalysis; Sheldon, R. A.; Van Bekkum, H.,
Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2000, and references cited
therein.
Hydroaminomethylation of 18; Method B; One-Pot Procedure
A glass liner, equipped with a magnetic stirring bar, containing the
olefin 18 (0.50 mmol), suitable aniline (0.50 mmol), catalyst 1 (7.5
mol%, 19 mg), and toluene (2.5 mL) was placed in a 45 mL auto-
clave. The procedure continues as described for olefins 16a–c.
5-Methyl-2-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-benzo[c]azepine
(17a)17
Purification by flash chromatography provided the title compound
in 91% yield (Method A) (in 90% using the one-pot procedure,
Method B).
1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): d = 1.35 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 3 H), 1.50–
1.59 (m, 1 H), 2.10–2.18 (m, 1 H), 3.09–3.18 (m, 1 H), 3.57–3.68
(m, 2 H), 4.54 (q, J = 14.9 Hz, 2 H), 6.63 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1 H), 6.78
(d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H), 7.10–7.23 (m, 5 H), 7.28 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1 H).
13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): d = 19.7, 33.5, 36.6, 47.0, 54.8,
112.3, 116.0, 125.8, 126.7, 127.6, 129.2, 129.4, 137.3, 144.7, 148.0.
HRMS: m/z calcd for C17H19N: 237.1517; found: 237.1509.
Catalytic Hydroformylation–Decarbonylation Reaction of
19a–d;18 General Procedure
(8) Dendrimers and Dendrons: Concepts, Synthesis,
Applications; Newkome, G. R.; Moorefield, C. N.; Vögtle,
F., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2001; and references cited
therein.
(9) Lu, S. M.; Alper, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 13126.
(10) (a) Bourque, S. C.; Maltais, F.; Xiao, W. J.; Tardif, O.;
Alper, H.; Arya, P.; Manzer, L. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999,
121, 3035. (b) Bourque, S. C.; Alper, H.; Manzer, L. E.;
Arya, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 956.
(11) Abu-Reziq, R.; Alper, H.; Wang, D. S.; Post, M. L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 5279.
(12) (a) Eilbracht, P.; Schmidt, A. M. Synthetic Applications of
Tandem Reaction Sequences Involving Hydroformylation, In
Xanthphos (0.2 mmol) and Rh(CO)2(acac) (0.05 mmol) were dis-
solved in anhyd THF (10 mL) under an atmosphere of argon in a
glass liner equipped with a magnetic stirring bar. The solution was
stirred for 2 min until the evolution of CO had ceased. To this solu-
tion was added N-(allyl)oxazolidine 19a–d (1 mmol) and the liner
was inserted into a 45 mL autoclave, which was then sealed. CO, 25
atm, was introduced to the autoclave by the two consecutive pump–
release cycles. Finally, H2 gas was introduced into the autoclave
bringing the overall pressure to 35 atm. The autoclave was placed
in a thermostated oil bath at 100 °C and the reaction was carried out
for 24 h. The autoclave was then cooled, and pressure was released.
Synthesis 2010, No. 17, 2893–2900 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York