7536 J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 123, No. 31, 2001
Ousmer et al.
Scheme 5a
Scheme 6a
a Reagents: (a) MeOOCCl, NaHCO3, H2O/THF (1:1), 99%; (b)
Me2SO4, K2CO3, acetone, 99%; (c) LAH, THF, 85%; (d) aqueous KOH,
86%; (e) EtOH, HCl(g), 100%; (f) TsCl, aqueous Na2CO3, CHCl3, 98%;
(g) aqueous NaOH, 98%.
a Reagents: (a) CCl4, PPh3, NEt3, MeCN/pyridine (1:1), 73%; (b)
PhI(OAc)2, CF3CH2OH, then solid NaHCO3; (c) Ac2O, pyridine, 41%
(for b + c); (d) H2, PtO2, EtOAc, 96%. PAN ) p-anisyl
preparation of 16 by literature methods19 afforded material of
mediocre optical purity. We thus devised an alternative route
(Scheme 5), which proceeded efficiently and caused no erosion
of stereochemical integrity. The optical quality of 16 was readily
readily cleavable Fukuyama-type nitrosulfonamide,24 was mo-
tivated by our desire to retain the original N-protecting group
during all transformation requiring reductants or nucleophiles.
The free amine would be released during vigorous hydride
reduction of the spirolactam segment to the corresponding
pyrrolidine. Notice that acetylation of the primary product of
oxidative cyclization results also in N-acylation of the tosyl-
amide. This event is of no import, because both acetyl groups
are removed simultaneously at a later stage of the synthesis.
Conversion of dienone 19 to the corresponding cyclohexanone
was effected by hydrogenation in the presence of PtO2 (Adams
catalyst). Palladium or rhodium catalysts were unsatisfactory
for the present application, due to their tendency to promote
reductive aromatization of the substrate through C-N bond
cleavage. This troublesome side reaction occurs to the extent
of 50-60% when hydrogenation is attempted over supported
Pd, but it constitutes the exclusive outcome when Rh catalysts
are employed. It is also worthy of note that the use of supported
platinum catalysts, e.g., Pt(C), resulted in formation of variable
amounts of the cyclohexanol corresponding to 20. No such
problem was observed with the Adams catalyst. Saturation of
dienones related to 19 may also be effected by hydrogenation
over Raney nickel, but in this case the fully reduced cyclohex-
anol is obtained.6
A straightforward series of reactions advanced intermediate
20 to keto aldehyde 23 (Scheme 7), which constitutes the
substrate for the crucial aldol cyclization leading to the
obligatory intermediate 24. The Snider synthesis of 1 employs
an analogous aldol step, details of which were first disclosed
in a preliminary communication3b that appeared while we were
researching the same transformation. We were thus assisted in
the optimization of our own reaction conditions by the important
observations recorded by these workers, who ultimately chose
tBuOK in tBuOH for the conduct of this step. We favor the
use of sodium methoxide in 90% aqueous methanol to ac-
complish the same transformation.25 Regio- and diastereose-
lectivity seem to be more satisfactory under these conditions.26
Compound 24 was the major, but not the exclusive, product
thus formed, and it was obtained in 44% yield after chromato-
graphic purification. It should be noted that aldehyde 23 is fairly
1
assessed by an H NMR shift study using (+)-Eu(hfc)3 as the
chiral shift reagent.
The union of an amino alcohol and a carboxylic acid to form
an oxazoline20 may be achieved by various methods, among
which the Wipf21 and the Vorbru¨ggen22 techniques are especially
effective. In the present case, the Vorbru¨ggen protocol represents
the method of choice, in that it leads to the desired heterocycle
in one step and it tolerates an unprotected phenolic function in
component 17. Conversely, the Wipf procedure involves cy-
clization of a preformed N-hydroxyethyl amide with the Burgess
reagent,23 and it requires protection of the phenolic OH to
suppress formation of sulfate esters. These are not readily
converted back to the free phenol, to the detriment of overall
yields.
Oxazoline 18 underwent DIB oxidation/acetylation to 19. We
note that the nature of the protecting group applied to the lateral
amino group in 18 is crucial for the success of the cyclization
step. In particular, a carbonyl-type blocking unit, e.g., BOC, is
unsatisfactory because it competes effectively with the oxazoline
for the electrophilic intermediate produced through DIB activa-
tion of the phenol. Products unrelated to the desired spirolactam
are thus obtained.12,13 The protecting group of choice here is a
sulfonamide, as thoroughly detailed in our previous communica-
tions. The sulfonamide does not interfere with the cyclization
step and it facilitates purification of the stereochemically labile
oxazoline by a particularly mild acid-base extraction (cf.
Experimental Section). Significantly, protection of the pendant
amino group as a sulfonamide is also apparent in the Sorensen
synthesis of 1.6 Our choice of a tosylamide, rather than a more
(18) Fischer, E.; Lipschitz, W. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1915, 48, 360. It
is noteworthy that direct tosylation of tyrosine gave only ditosylated tyrosine
(conversion 50%) (McChesney, E. V.; Swann, Wm. K., Jr. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1937, 59, 1116), whereas tyrosine ethyl ester gave clean monotosylated
product.
(19) The preparation of 16 has been described byAbarbri et al. and Jung
et al. (Abarbri, M.; Guignard, A.; Lamant, M. HelV. Chim. Acta 1995, 78,-
109. Jung, M. E.; Jachiet, D.; Rohloff, J. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30,
4211). Unfortunately, the product thus obtained is essentially racemic (cf.
Supporting Information).
(20) Review: Gant, T. G.; Meyers A. I. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 2297.
(21) (a) Wipf, P.; Miller, C. P. Tetrahedron Lett 1992, 33, 907. (b) Wipf,
P.; Kim, Y.; Goldstein, D. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 11106. (c)
Wipf, P.; Li, W. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 4576.
(24) Fukuyama, T.; Jow, C.-K.; Cheung, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36,
6373.
(22) Vorbru¨ggen, H.; Krolikiewicz, K. Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 9353.
(23) (a) Atkins, G. M.; Burgess, E. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90,
4744. (b) Burgess, E. M.; Penton, H. R., Jr.; Taylor, E. A.; Williams, W.
M. Organic Syntheses; Wiley: New York, 1988; Collect. Vol. VI, p 788.
(25) The terminology “sodium methoxide in aqueous methanol” stands
only to indicate the reagents utilized in this step, and it should not be
interpreted as an inference regarding the precise nature of the basic species
present in solution and/or responsible for the reaction.