T. K. Chakraborty et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 42 (2001) 5085–5088
5087
1. TBAF, THF
1. SO3-Py, DIPEA,
DMSO, CH2Cl2, 0 oC
2. TBSOTf, 2,6-lutidine,
CH2Cl2, 0 oC
Me Me
Me Me
CH3(CH2)12
TBSO
CH3(CH2)12
OH
CO2H
OPMB
13
TBSO
OPMB
2. NaClO2, NaH2PO4,
2-methyl-2-butene, tBuOH, rt
95%
3. CSA (cat.), MeOH-CH2Cl2
0 oC
20
19
68%
Me Me
Me Me
Me(CH2)12
O
Me(CH2)12
O
Me
Me
Me
Me
Coupling with 17
CSA (cat.), MeOH,
TBSO
O
HN
OH
O
HN
(same method as described
in Scheme 1: 6 to 18)
0 oC
PMB
O
PMB
O
MeO2C
MeO2C
O
O
NH
NH
N
N
75%
70%
H
H
OBn
OBn
Me
OBn
Me
OBn
LiOH, THF-MeOH-H2O
0 oC
21
22
Macrolactonisation
5
96%
Scheme 2.
of 15 were identical with those reported for the
degraded product.3 The remaining part of the synthesis
was then carried out by acetate protection of the sec-
ondary alcohol in 13 followed by silyl deprotection to
give the primary alcohol 16 in 85% yield from 13.
Finally, Jones oxidation of 16 furnished the desired
fatty acid segment 6 in 70% yield.
the C5-silyloxy acid 20 in 95% yield. The acid 20 and
the peptide segment 17 were then coupled to give
compound 21 in 70% yield. TBS-deprotection of 21
gave the intermediate 22 that was subjected to ester
hydrolysis to furnish the desired hydroxy acid 5.
The stage was now set to carry out the crucial macro-
lactonization reaction, but, unfortunately, even after
trying several methods, for example the Yamaguchi
method,10 dipyridyl disulfide,11 DCC-DMAP (cat.),12
etc. we were unable to prepare the desired cyclised
product from 5. Whether the above failure should be
attributed to an inherent structural feature of the
cyclization intermediate 5, which possibly could not
attain the required conformation for ester bond forma-
tion, or to steric hindrance due to the presence of long
chain, is not yet clear. Efforts are now going on to form
the ester bond first and then carry out a macrolac-
tamization reaction in order to complete the targeted
total synthesis of stevastelin B. These studies will be
reported in due course.
The peptide segment 7 was synthesized from commer-
cially available protected amino acids by standard solu-
tion phase peptide synthesis conditions using
1-ethyl-3-(3-(dimethylamino)propyl)carbodiimide hydro-
chloride (EDCI) and 1-hydroxybenzotriazole (HOBt) as
coupling agents and dry CH2Cl2 as solvent.
Both the halves of the molecule were now ready to be
coupled. The tripeptide 7 was accordingly treated with
50% TFA in CH2Cl2 at 0°C to effect Boc deprotection,
leading to the free-NH2 containing tripeptide 17, which
was coupled with the acid 6 following the peptide
coupling method described above to obtain the coupled
product 18 in 65% yield. At this stage, we thought that
both the ester and the acetate groups would be
hydrolyzed upon treatment with base. Unfortunately,
the proton NMR spectrum of the hydrolyzed product
revealed that only the ester function had been
hydrolyzed, while the acetate remained intact. Attempts
to deprotect the acetate first, before the hydrolysis of
the ester function, using various methods did not
succeed.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank Drs. A. C. Kunwar and M.
Vairamani for NMR and mass spectroscopic assistance,
respectively, and the CSIR, New Delhi, for research
fellowships to S.G. and S.D.
To overcome this setback, it was decided to use silyl
protection for the C5–OH, instead of an acetate group.
This alternative approach is shown in Scheme 2. Desily-
lation of 13 and then di-TBS protection was followed
by selective primary TBS-deprotection to give the com-
pound 19 in 68% yield. A two-step oxidation of 19 gave
References
1. Morino, T.; Masuda, A.; Yamada, M.; Nishimoto, M.;
Nishikiori, T.; Saito, S.; Shimada, N. J. Antibiot. 1994,
47, 1341–1343.