connection, we synthesized dithiane-bearing crowns 5-7 via
the alkylation of 4 with (poly)ethylene glycol ditosylates in
DMF in the presence of sodium hydride (Scheme 2).3
bond cleavage in the generated cation-radical. The benzophe-
none anion-radical generally accelerates the second step by
deprotonating the hydroxy group.5
To evaluate the liquid membrane transport properties and
the possibility of photochemically shutting off the transport,
we chose methyl viologen as a guest molecule. In addition
to structural considerations, our choice of guest was influ-
enced by our finding that methyl viologen itself can sensitize
C-C bond cleavage in dithiane-carbonyl adducts. We found
that bis-crown 10 (based on 19-crown-6) transported methyl
viologen with greater efficiency than either the 16-crown-5
host 9 or 13-crown-4 host 8. Figure 1 shows this efficient
Scheme 2
Crown ethers 5-7 were purified by column chromatog-
raphy and then utilized as building blocks to assemble bis-
crown ethers 8-10 (Scheme 3). First, the corresponding
Scheme 3
Figure 1. Methyl viologen transport through the liquid (chloro-
form) membrane assisted by 10 (9). The efficiency of transport
by irradiated 10 is significantly reduced (2). Poor mono-crown
carrier 7 is shown for comparison (b).
transport from the donor aqueous phase to the receiving
aqueous phase through the chloroform solution of bis-crown
dithiane anions were generated with butyllithium at -20 °C
in THF. The lithiodithianes were then quenched with
isophthalic aldehyde at -78 °C to furnish bis-crowns 8-10
(60-80%).4
As expected from our earlier studies on photoinduced C-C
bond cleavage in R-hydroxyalkyldithianes, bis-crowns 8-10
undergo efficient photofragmentation in the presence of an
external ET-sensitizer, benzophenone. The general mecha-
nism for cleavage, exemplified by the photoinduced C-C
bond scission in a parent compound, the dithiane-benzal-
dehyde adduct, is shown in Scheme 4. After initial excitation,
(3) Typical procedure: 8,11,14,17-Tetraoxa-2,4-dithiaspiro[5.12]-
octadecane (5). A solution of 5,5-di(hydroxymethyl)-1,3-dithiane 4 (0.40
g, 2.2 mmol) in 40 mL of DMF was stirred under a nitrogen atmosphere.
This solution was treated with hexane-washed NaH (0.21 g, 8.8 mmol).
After 15 min of stirring, tri(ethylene glycol) di-p-tosylate (0.96 g, 2.1 mmol)
was added and allowed to stir at room temperature overnight. The resulting
mixture was carefully treated with NH4Cl and then extracted into ether.
The ethereal layer was washed 4× with NH4Cl and 2× with water to remove
all DMF, dried, and concentrated. Flash column chromatography (1:1 ethyl
acetate:hexanes) gave 0.54 g of a light yellow oil (88%): 1H NMR (CDCl3,
400 Hz) 3.64-3.72 (m, 18H), 2.72 (s, 4H); MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity)
294 (M+, 30), 144 (60), 98 (100), 85 (60).
(4) Compounds 8-10 were purified by column chromatography without
separating individual diastereomers. Typical procedure: {3-[Hydroxy-
(8,11,14,17-tetraoxa-2,4-dithiaspiro[5.12]octadec-3-yl)methyl]phenyl}-
(8,11,14,17-tetraoxa-2,4-dithiaspiro[5.12]octadec-3-yl)methanol (8). A
solution of 5 (0.130 g, 0.44 mmol) in 10 mL of freshly distilled THF was
cooled to -20 °C, and 1.6 M n-butyllithium (0.41 mL, 0.66 mmol) was
added while stirring under a N2 atmosphere. The reaction mixture was stirred
at this temperature for 2 h, after which the reaction was further cooled to
-78 °C, and isophthalaldehyde (0.030 g, 0.22 mmol) in 2 mL of THF was
added via syringe. The resulting mixture was allowed to slowly warm to
room temperature over a period of 2 h and then stirred overnight. The
resulting yellow solution was washed 2× with 10 mL of saturated NH4Cl,
extracted into ether, dried, and concentrated. Flash column chromatography
(1:50 MeOH:CHCl3) gave 0.150 g of a clear oil (94%): 1H NMR (CD3-
CN, 400 Hz) 7.41 (b, 1H), 7.30 (d, J ) 1.2 Hz, 3H), 4.82 (m, 2H), 4.16
(dd, J1 ) 1.6 Hz, J2 ) 6.8 Hz, 2H), 3.53-3.62 (m, 32H), 3.44 (s, 2H),
2.70-2.78 (m, 4H), 2.52-2.58 (m, 4H).
Scheme 4
triplet benzophenone is quenched via single electron transfer
from the dithiane moiety, followed by the mesolytic C-C
(5) For further mechanistic details of the photocleavage, see refs 2a,c.
2634
Org. Lett., Vol. 3, No. 17, 2001