S. Kiyohara et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 48 (2007) 6877–6880
tBu
6879
tBu
O
O
O
O
tBu
tBu
tBu
tBu
1
O
O
O
O
tBu
tBu
3
Scheme 2.
on the solid sample and its intensity increased with
increasing temperature up to 170 °C.8 These observa-
tions are in line with the event in solution. Thus, the
C–C bond in 1 thermally undergoes homolytic bond dis-
sociation also in the solid state, but the biradical pro-
duced in the solid state is persistent and gradually
regenerates the cyclopropane ring with decreasing tem-
perature. It is conceivable that, in a crystalline environ-
ment, dynamic movement is suppressed and a rather
static equilibrium is achieved.
Small amounts of decomposition products were detected
in the recovered solids. Thus, the solid-state thermo-
chromism described above was not highly efficient.
Above 190 °C, the solid sample decomposed and the
ESR signal faded. The decomposition of 1 proceeded
slowly in chloroform solution to afford 4 and 5 in 48%
and 39% yields, respectively, along with 2 in 11% yield
on standing for two weeks9 (see Scheme 3).
Figure 4. Histogram for the C–C bond distances in cyclopropane
compounds.
X-ray crystal structure of 1 revealed a significantly elon-
gated C–C bond.
It should be noted that the C–C bond for dissociation is
Acknowledgments
˚
significantly elongated as long as 1.595(8) A in contrast
˚
to 1.564(9) A of the other two bonds. We examined crys-
We thank Professor Naoto Hayashi, Department of
Chemistry, Toyama University, Japan, for his assistance
with the CSD analysis.
tal data deposited in the Cambridge Structural Database
(CSD) for the C–C bond lengths of compounds bearing
a cyclopropane ring as a partial structure.10 The distri-
bution of the cyclopropane C–C bond lengths for
12,960 bonds in 2719 compounds are shown in Fig. 4.
The C–C bond in 1 is obviously within 10% of the lon-
gest bond. The high reactivity of 1 to bond dissociation
could be attributed, at least in part, to this long but
weak C–C bond.
References and notes
1. (a) Diradicals; Borden, W. T., Ed.; Wiley: New York,
1982; (b) Borden, W. T.; Iwamura, H.; Berson, J. A. Acc.
Chem. Res. 1994, 109; (c) Rajca, A. Chem. Rev. 1994, 94,
871; (d) Iwamura, H. Adv. Phys. Org. Chem. 1990, 26, 179.
2. (a) Shultz, D. A.; Boal, A. K.; Farmer, G. T. J. Org.
Chem. 1998, 63, 9462; (b) Chandross, E. A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1964, 86, 1263; (c) Kopf, P. W.; Kreilik, W. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1969, 19, 6569; (d) Yang, N. C.; Castro, A. J.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1960, 82, 6208; (e) Anderson, K. K.;
Schultz, D. A.; Dougherty, D. A. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62,
7575; (f) Bock, H.; John, A.; Havias, Z.; Bats, J. W.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32, 416; (g) Mukai, K.;
Ishizu, K.; Nakahara, M.; Deguci, Y. Bull. Chem. Soc.
Jpn. 1980, 53, 3363; (h) Van Willigen, H.; Kirste, B.;
Kurreck, H.; Plato, M. Tetrahedron 1982, 38, 759.
In summary, we have demonstrated the dynamic behav-
ior of bond dissociation and regeneration in the trispiro-
conjoined cyclopropane compound 1 in solution. In the
solid state, such dynamic behavior was suppressed and
reversible bond dissociation and recombination were
thermally induced accompanied by color change. The
tBu
tBu
O
O
O
O
1
3. (a) Becker, H.-D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 32, 2115; (b)
Becker, H.-D. J. Org. Chem. 1969, 34, 1203; (c) Aleksfuk,
O.; Grynszpan, F.; Biali, S. E. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1993, 11; (d) Aleksiuk, O.; Cohen, S.; Biali, S. E.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 9645; (e) Agbaria, K.;
Aleksiuk, O.; Biali, S. E.; Bohmer, V.; Frings, M.;
O
tBu
tBu
4
5
Scheme 3.