A. K. Bhattacharya et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 42 (2001) 5393–5395
5395
UMP derivative in the presence of 1H-tetrazole18 in
pyridine for 3 days at rt afforded 1 and 2 (Table 1) as
white powders, respectively (after isolation and purifica-
tion by HPLC,19 ion exchange, Amberlite IR-120 (Na+
form) and lyophilisation). The structural assignments of
1 and 2 are based on NMR (1H, 13C and 31P) and MS
(FAB or MALDI) data.
3. Kornfeld, S.; Kornfeld, R. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1985,
54, 631–664.
4. Leloir, L. F. Science 1971, 172, 1299–1303.
5. Leloir, L. F.; Caputto, R.; Cardini, C. E.; Paladini, A.
C. J. Biol. Chem. 1950, 184, 333–350.
6. Schaub, C.; Mu¨ller, B.; Schmidt, R. R. Glycoconjugate
J. 1998, 15, 345–354.
7. Mu¨ller, B.; Martin, T. J.; Schaub, C.; Schmidt, R. R.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 509–512.
8. Martin, T. J.; Schmidt, R. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993,
34, 1765–1768.
9. Schmidt, R. R.; Wegmann, B.; Jung, K.-H. Liebigs
Ann. Chem. 1991, 121–124.
In a similar fashion, synthesis of 3 and 4 were also carried
out (Scheme 1). Treatment of 7 with NBS in the presence
of catalytic amounts of a,a%-azo-isobutyronitrile (AIBN)
in CCl4 and irradiation of the reaction mixture for 8 h
with a Hg-lamp furnished 11, whereas bromide 1220,21
was prepared by treatment of 8 with CBr4/Ph3P/Et3N in
CH2Cl2 at 0°C. Subsequent reactions of bromides 11 and
12 with tris-trimethylsilyl phosphite furnished the corre-
sponding phosphonates 15 and 16 which were trans-
formed into their bis-triethylammonium salts 19 and 20
in the usual way. Their reaction with uridine-5%-morpho-
lidiphosphate in the presence of 1H-tetrazole in pyridine
for 3 days at rt furnished 3 and 4 (Table 1) as white
powders, respectively (after isolation and purification by
HPLC,19 ion exchange, Amberlite IR-120 (Na+ form)
and lyophilisation). The structures of 3 and 4 were
assigned on the basis of NMR (1H, 13C and 31P) and MS
(FAB or MALDI) data.
10. (a) Schmidt, R. R. XIVth Int. Carbohydr. Sympl., PL
8, Stockholm, Aug. 1988; (b) Schmidt, R. R.; Gaden,
H.; Jatzke, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 327–330; (c)
Schmidt, R. R. In Carbohydrates—Synthetic Methods
and Application in Medicinal Chemistry; Ogura, H.;
Hasegawa, A.; Suami, T., Eds.; Kodoanasha Scientific
Ltd: Tokyo, 1992; pp. 68–88.
11. (a) Palcic, M. M.; Heerze, L. D.; Srivastava, O. P.;
Hindsgaul, O. J. Biol. Chem. 1989, 264, 17174–17181;
(b) Noort, D.; van der Marel, G. A.; van der Gen, A.;
Mulder, G. J.; van Boom, J. H. Recl. Trav. Chim.
Pays-Bas 1991, 110, 53–56 and references cited therein.
12. Sun, H.; Yang, J.; Amaral, K. E.; Horenstein, B. A.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 2451–2453 and references
cited therein.
In conclusion, we report on the design and synthesis of
inhibitors 1–4 as mimetics of UDP-Glc (or UDP-Gal).
These novel classes of compounds are presumed to
feature potent inhibition of glucosyltransferases (or
galactosyltransferases) because they are structurally
related to the transition states. Biological evaluations are
currently under investigation and we expect that this will
give us insight into various mechanisms of several
metabolic processes. The biological activity data of
inhibitors 1–4 will be reported in due course.
13. Amann, F.; Schaub, C.; Mu¨ller, B.; Schmidt, R. R.
Chem. Eur. J. 1998, 6, 1106–1115.
14. (a) Frische, K. Ph.D. Dissertation, Universita¨t Kon-
stanz, 1992; (b) Schmidt, R. R.; Frische, K. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 1993, 3, 1747–1750; (c) Frische, K.;
Schmidt, R. R. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1994, 325–329.
15. Schaub, C.; Mu¨ller, B.; Schmidt, R. R. Eur. J. Org.
Chem. 2000, 1745–1758.
16. Mu¨ller, B.; Schaub, C.; Schmidt, R. R. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 2893–2897.
Acknowledgements
17. (a) Hunter, W. H.; Edgar, D. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1932, 54, 2025–2026; (b) Shaw, H.; Perlmutter, H. D.;
Gu, C.; Arco, S. D.; Quibuyen, T. O. J. Org. Chem.
1997, 62, 236–237; (c) Venkatachalapathy, C.; Pitchu-
mani, K. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 2581–2584.
This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungs-
gemeinschaft and the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie.
One of the authors (A.K.B.) is grateful to the Deutscher
Akademischer Austauschdienst (DAAD) for a research
fellowship. We are grateful to Ms. Anke Friemel and Mr.
Klaus Ha¨gele, Fachbereich Chemie, Universita¨t Kon-
stanz, Konstanz for recording NMR (600 MHz) and
FAB-MS, respectively.
18. Wittmann, V.; Wong, C. H. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62,
2144–2147.
19. HPLC conditions: Shimadzu LC8A preparative pump
and a Rainin Dynamax UV 1 detector at 254 nm;
column used: Eurospher RP-18, 7 mm, 250×16 mm
(Knauer, Germany); mobile phase: 0.05 M triethyl-
ammonium bicarbonate buffer+2–8% acetonitrile.
20. Barnes, R. A.; Fales, H. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1953,
75, 3830–3831.
References
21. Baker, W.; Buggle, K. M.; McOmie, J. F. W.; Watkins,
D. A. M. J. Chem. Soc. 1958, 3594–3600.
1. Varki, A. Glycobiology 1993, 3, 97–130.
2. Dwek, R. A. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 683–720.
.