mixture was stirred for 10 min at RT during while the organic phase turned
orange. After extraction with diethyl ether (10 ml), evaporation and addition
of pentane to the resulting oil, the pseudobase 4 was obtained as a yellow
powder (110 mg, 0.184 mmol, 92%). Selected data for 4: n(CH2Cl2)/
cm21 1922, 2017 (C·O); dH(200 MHz, CDCl3): 0.51 (s, 3H, CH3), 4.51 (s,
2H, CH2), 5.49 (t, 2H, J = 2.4 Hz, Cp), 5.59 (t, 2H, J = 2.4 Hz, Cp), 7.24
(s, 1H, –CHN), 7.67–7.43 (m, 6H, Ph), 7.91 (d, 2H, J = 8.5 Hz, Ph), 8.09
(d, 2H, J = 8.5 Hz, Ph); dC(100 MHz, CDCl3): 230.9 (CH3), 41.7 (C4),
90.1 (C2,2A-Cp), 92.5 (C3,3A-Cp), 109.4 (C1-Cp), 121.2 (C2), 128.3, 128.4,
128.7, 128.9 (Cortho,meta-Ph), 133.0, 133.6 (Cpara-Ph), 136.5 (Cipso-Ph),
138.8 (Cipso-Ph), 144.4 (C3), 190.3 (C1), 195.7 (C5), 215.1 (C·O), 227.6
(C·O); Elemental anal. Calc. for C26H20O5W: C, 52.36; H, 3.36. Found: C,
52.84; H, 3.54%.
‡ Crystal data for C26H20O5W (4): The compound crystallises in the
¯
triclinic space group P1; Mr = 596.27, a = 9.952(2), b = 10.753(3), c =
Fig. 1 The molecular structure of 4. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles
(°); C(5)–C(10) 1.424(9), C(10)–C(19) 1.325(10), C(19)–C(20) 1.473(9),
C(20)–O(5) 1.227(9), C(20)–C(21) 1.484(10); C(6)–C(5)–C(10) 126.5(7),
C(5)–C(10)–C(19) 119.3(6), C(10)–C(19)–C(20) 124.7(6), C(19)–C(20)–
O(5) 122.4(7), C(19)–C(20)–C(21) 118.1(6), C(5)–C(10)–C(11) 117.0(6),
C(10)–C(11)–C(12) 112.6(6), C(11)–C(12)–O(4) 120.8(8), C(11)–C(12)–
C(13) 118.4(6).
12.567(3) Å, a = 66.63(2), b = 71.183(19), g = 63.35(2)°, U = 1086.2(4)
Å3, Z = 2, T = 293(2) K, m = 5.353 mm21, Dc = 1.823 Mg m23, F(000)
= 580, Of a total of 6921 collected reflections, 6315 were unique (R(int) =
0.0325) and used in all calculations. The final wR2 = 0.1622 (all data),
R1 [I > 2s(I)] = 0.0755. The structure was solved by direct methods,
SHELXS-97,14 and refined by full matrix least squares using SHELXL-
97.15 SHELX operations were automated using ORTEX which was also
used to obtain the drawings.16 Data were corrected for Lorentz, polarization
effects and for absorption by the method of Y scans. The minimum
transmission was 74%.17 Hydrogen atoms were included in calculated
positions with thermal parameters 30% larger than the atom to which they
are attached. The non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. All
calculations were performed on a Pentium PC. CCDC reference number
crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format.
in the 13C{1H} NMR spectrum. These spectroscopic data are
very similar to those of the corresponding compound bearing a
phenyl group instead of the organo-tungsten fragment11 except
for the carbon C3 signal which is shifted 8 ppm upfield.
The structure of pseudobase 4 was confirmed by X-ray
crystallography (Fig. 1).‡ The complex exhibits a four-legged
piano stool geometry with the methyl group on tungsten and the
substituent on the Cp in perpendicular vertical planes. Bond
distances within the diketone chain are in agreement with those
reported for the only structurally characterized pseudobase
PhC(O)CHNC(CF3)CH2C(O)Ph12 which bears a CF3 sub-
stituent in place of the Cp-tungsten fragment. The dihedral
angles along the conjugated chain (C(6)–C(5)–C(10)–C(19)
18.6°; C(10)–C(19)–C(20)–O(5) 21.2°; O(5)–C(20)–C(21)–
C(26) 18.7°) show significant deviation from planarity and the
two phenyl end groups are almost perpendicular to each
other.
1 K. L. Malisza, S. Top, J. Vaissermann, B. Caro, M.-C. Sénéchal-
Tocquer, D. Sénéchal, J.-Y. Saillard, S. Triki, S. Kahlal, J. F. Britten, M.
J. McGlinchey and G. Jaouen, Organometallics, 1995, 14, 5273.
2 M. Salmain, K. L. Malisza, S. Top, G. Jaouen, M.-C. Sénéchal Tocquer,
D. Sénéchal and B. Caro, Bioconjugate Chem., 1994, 5, 655.
3 B. Caro, F. Le Guen-Robin, M. Salmain and G. Jaouen, Tetrahedron,
2000, 56, 257.
4 T. L. Blundell and L. N. Johnson, Protein Crystallography, Academic
Press, New York, 1976, pp. 173–259.
5 B. Caro, M.-C. Sénéchal-Tocquer, D. Sénéchal and P. Marrec,
Tetrahedron Lett., 1993, 34, 7259.
6 (a) G. N. Dorofeenko, V. V. Krasnikov and A. I. Pyshchev, Khim.
Geterotskl. Soedin., 1977, 599; Chem. Abstr., 1977, 87, 85121; L. Yu.
Ukhin, A. I. Pyshchev, V. V. Krasnikov, Zh. I. Orlova and G. N.
Dorofeenko, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1977, 234, 1351; Chem. Abstr.,
1977, 87, 168162; (c) V. V. Krasnikov, Yu. P. Andreichikov, N. V.
Kholodova and G. N. Dorofeenko, Zh. Org. Khim., 1977, 13, 1566;
Chem. Abstr., 1977, 87, 152357.
7 (a) V. V. Krasnikov and G. N. Dorofeenko, Khim. Geterotsikl. Soedin.,
1979, 21; Chem. Abstr., 1979, 80, 168702 (b) G. N. Dorofeenko and V.
V. Krasnikov, Zh. Org. Khim., 1972, 8, 2620; Chem. Abstr., 1973, 78,
97785; A. G. Milaev and O. Yu. Okhlobystin, Khim. Geterotsikl.
Soedin., 1985, 593; Chem. Abstr., 1986, 104, 68978.
8 D. P. Egan, P. McArdle, M. Salmain and G. Jaouen, unpublished
work.
The kinetics of reaction of complex 3 with n-butylamine in
acetonitrile was studied spectrophotometrically. Conversion to
the N-butylpyridinium salt followed a pseudo-first order
reaction rate with kobs = 5.4 3 1024 s21. The structure of the
1
final product was confirmed by H NMR. For comparison, in
the same experimental conditions, a kobs of 0.58 3 1024 s21 and
0.32 3 1024 s21 was measured for 4-benchrotrenyl-2,6-di-
phenylpyrylium tetrafluoroborate and 2,4,6-triphenylpyrylium
tetrafluoroborate, respectively.3,13
This synthesis may help provide a new approach in X-ray
structural determination of proteins.
This work was supported by the European COST D8/0016
action.
9 A. R. Katritzky, R. T. C. Brownlee and G. Musumarra, Heterocycles,
1979, 12, 775.
Notes and references
10 A. T. Balaban, G. W. Fischer, A. Dinulescu, A. V. Koblik, G. N.
Dorofeenko, V. V. Mezhritski and W. Schroth, Adv. Heterocycl. Chem.,
Suppl. II, ed. A. R. Katritzky, Academic Press, New York, 1982.
11 A. R. Katritzky, R. T. C. Brownlee and G. Musumarra, Tetrahedron
Lett., 1980, 1643.
12 R. G. Pritchard, S. Tajammal and A. E. Tipping, Acta Crystallogr., Sect.
C , 1994, 50, 294.
13 A. R. Katritzky and R. H. Manzo, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans., 1981,
2, 571.
14 G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A, 1990, 46, 467.
15 G. M. Sheldrick, SHELXL-97: a computer program for crystal structure
determination, University of Göttingen, 1997.
† Synthetic procedure for 3: to a solution of the pyran complex 2 (232 mg,
–
0.4 mmol) in acetonitrile (10 mL) was added Ph3C+BF4 (170 mg, 0.45
mmol). The solution was stirred for 0.5 h at RT. On addition of diethyl ether
(30 ml), complex 3 precipitated as a deep purple solid (205 mg, 0.29 mmol,
72%). Selected data for 3: n(CH2Cl2)/cm21 1936, 2026 (C·O); dH(200
MHz, d6-acetone): 0.54 (s, 3H, CH3), 6.28 (t, 2H, J = 2.4 Hz, Cp), 6.93 (t,
2H, J = 2.4 Hz, Cp), 7.93–7.75 (m, 6H, Ph), 8.54 (m, 4H, Ph), 8.79 (s, 2H,
H3,5-pyr); dC(100 MHz, d6-acetone) 230.8 (CH3), 93.8 (C2,2A-Cp), 98.3
(C1-Cp), 99.6 (C3,3A-Cp), 113.50 (C3,5-pyr), 129.3 (Cortho-Ph), 130.1 (Cipso
-
Ph), 130.8 (Cmeta-Ph), 135.9 (Cpara-Ph), 164.1 (C4-pyr), 171.2 (C2,6-pyr),
214.5 (C·O), 226.1 (C·O); Elemental anal. Calc. for C26H19BF4O4W: C,
46.87; H, 2.85. Found: C, 46.76; H, 2.91%. Synthetic procedure for 4: to a
solution of the pyrylium complex 3 (143 mg, 0.2 mmol) in acetone (5 ml)
and ether (5 ml) was added K2CO3 (70 mg, 2 mmol) in water (3 ml). The
16 P. McArdle, J. Appl. Crystallogr., 1995, 28, 65.
17 A. C. T. North, D. C. Phillips and F. S. Mathews, Acta Crystallogr.,
Sect. A, 1968, 24, 351.
Chem. Commun., 2001, 1504–1505
1505