9092 J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 123, No. 37, 2001
Cui et al.
LAlI2 (1)5a in the presence of alkynes for trapping reduction
transients and generating unusual aluminum compounds. The
comparison between two reactions would be useful in under-
standing the reductive coupling mechanism.
X-ray Structure Determinations and Refinements. Data for crystal
structures of 3 and 6‚OEt2 were collected on a STOE-AED2 four-circle
diffractometer and data for the structures of 4, 8‚OEt2, and 9 were
collected on a Stoe-Siemens-Huber four circle diffractometer equipped
with a CCD area detector using Mo KR radiation (λ ) 0.71073 Å).
All structures were solved by direct methods (SHELXS-96)15 and
refined against F2 using SHELXL-97.16 All heavy atoms were refined
anisotropically. Hydrogen atoms were included using the riding model
with Uiso tied to the Uiso of the parent atom. The Et2O molecule in
6‚OEt2 was disordered over two positions. It was refined with distance
restraints and restraints for the anisotropic displacement parameters.
The structure of 4 was refined as a pseudomerohedral twin. The twin
law is [-100 010 001]. The fractional contribution of the second domain
refines to 0.4511(8). Additionally the structure shows pseudosymmetry.
A great number of the atoms fulfill the symmetry of space group P21/
n. But refinement in this space group was much worse even if disorder
was modeled. Crystal data, data collection details, structural solution
and refinement procedures for all compounds are summarized in Table
1.
The reactions of aluminum compounds (alkyls, hydrides, and
halides) with alkynes have been explored extensively.7 The
resulting aluminum vinyl derivatives undergo interesting thermal
and photoinduced rearrangements and have proved to be
valuable precursors for organic chain growing reactions.8
Aluminum cyclopropene analogues have been proposed as
reactive intermediates in the formation of the related 1,4-
(dialumina)cyclohexadienes via dimerization9 and in the reaction
of unstable Al(I) compounds with alkynes.10 We reasoned that
such strained ring systems would show high chemical reactivities
and unique reaction patterns. Herein, we report on the synthesis
of cyclopropene analogues of aluminum and an aluminum
pinacolate by reductive coupling reaction in the presence of
alkynes and benzophenone, and the reaction of a cyclopropene
analogue of aluminum LAl[η2-C2(SiMe3)2] (3) with CO2,
Ph2CO, nitriles PhCN and t-BuCN, and bulky azides Ph3SiN3
and 2,6-Trip2C6H3N3 (Trip ) 2,4,6-i-Pr3C6H2).
Synthesis of LAl[η2-C2(SiMe3)2] (3). A solution of LAlI2 (1)5a (1.40
g, 2 mmol) and bis(trimethylsilyl)alkyne (0.34 g, 2 mmol) in toluene
(20 mL) was added to a suspension of finely divided potassium (0.16
g, 4.1 mmol) at room temperature. The mixture was stirred at room
temperature for 2 d. The solution developed a red-black color and all
the potassium appeared consumed. Subsequently all volatiles were
removed under vacuum, and the residue was extracted with n-hexane
(20 mL). After filtration the red black filtrate was concentrated (ca 6
mL) and stored at -30 °C overnight affording red-black crystals of 3
(0.68 g, 55.4%). Mp: 182-184 °C. 1H NMR (d8-toluene, 298 K, 500.13
MHz): δ 6.97-7.09 (m, 6 H, Ar-H), 4.78 (s, 1 H, γ-CH), 3.33 (sept,
4 H, J ) 6.8 Hz, CHMe2), 1.43 (s, 6 H, Me), 1.42 (d, 12 H, J ) 6.8
Hz, CHMe2), 1.11 (d, 12 H, J ) 6.8 Hz, CHMe2), 0.10 (s, 18 H, SiMe3).
13C NMR (C6D6, 100.60 MHz): δ 228.5 (Al-C), 174.1(CN), 143.5,
140.4, 124.3 (Ph), 97.2 (γ-C), 28.7 (CHMe2), 25.6, 24.1 (CHMe2), 24.0
(Me), 1.8 (SiMe3). 27Al NMR (d8-toluene, 130.32 MHz): δ 90 ( 5
(ν1/2 ≈ 2500 Hz). 29Si NMR (C6D6, 79.46 MHz): δ -24.7.
Experimental Section
General Procedures. All experiments were carried out under an
atmosphere of dry nitrogen or argon using Schlenk techniques or inside
a MBraun MB 150-GI glovebox filled with dry nitrogen where the O2
and H2O level were strictly controlled below 1 ppm. All solvents were
dried using standard methods prior to use.11 The samples for analytical
measurements were prepared inside the glovebox. Commercially
available chemicals were purchased from Fluka or Aldrich and used
as received. The other compounds used in this paper were prepared
according to published procedures: H2C[(CMe)(NAr)]2 (Ar ) 2,6-i-
Pr2C6H3),12 Ph3SiN3,13 and 2,6-Trip2C6H3N3 (Trip ) 2,4,6-i-Pr3C6H2).14
Physical Measurements and Analysis. The melting points of all
compounds described in this paper were measured on a Bu¨hler SPA-1
apparatus in sealed capillaries and uncorrected.1H, 13C, 27Al, and 29Si
NMR spectra were recorded on Avance-500, Avance-200, Bruker MSL-
400, AM-250, and AM-200 instruments. The chemical shifts are
reported in ppm with reference to external standards, namely SiMe4
Synthesis of LAl(η2-C2Ph2) (4). Compound 4 was prepared in a
similar manner as 3. LAlI2 (1) (1.4 g, 2 mmol), diphenylalkyne (0.36
g, 2 mmol), and potassium (0.16 g, 4.1 mmol) were used. After filtration
and partial removal of the solvents, the solution was stored at -30 °C
overnight affording orange crystals of 4 (0.86 g, 70%). Mp: 260 °C
1
(dec). H NMR (C6D6, 200.13 MHz): δ 6.8-7.15 (m, 16 H, Ar-H),
1
for H, 13C, and 29Si nuclei and 1 M aqueous AlCl3 for 27Al NMR.
4.89 (s, 1 H, γ-CH), 3.39 (sept, 4 H, J ) 6.8 Hz, CHMe2), 1.53 (s, 6
H, Me), 1.21 (d, 12 H, J ) 6.8 Hz, CHMe2), 1.11 (d, 12 H, J ) 6.8
Hz, CHMe2). 13C NMR (C6D6, 125.76 MHz): δ 177.2 (Al-C), 173.1
(CN), 144.2, 144.0, 139.2, 131.9, 128.6, 128.4, 124.5, 124.0 (Ph), 97.3
(γ-C), 29.1 (CHMe2), 25.0, 24.4 (CHMe2), 23.5 (Me).
Heteroatomic spectra were recorded 1H-decoupled. If not otherwise
stated, the operation temperature was in the range from 293 to 300 K.
ESR measurements were performed on a Varian (9.6 MHz) instrument.
UV spectra were recorded on a PERKIN ELMER 320 instrument.
Synthesis of LAl[η2-C2Ph(SiMe3)] (5). Compound 5 was prepared
similarly to 3: LAlI2 (1) (1.4 g, 2 mmol), 1-phenyl-2-(trimethylsilyl)-
alkyne (0.35 g, 2 mmol), and potassium (0.16 g, 4.1 mmol) were
employed. Crystallization from toluene at -30 °C gave orange crystals
of 5 (0.74 g, 60%). Mp: 242 °C. 1H NMR (d8-toluene, 200.13 MHz):
δ 7.06-7.12 (m, 11 H, Ar-H), 4.87 (s, γ-CH), 3.36, 3.21 (dsept, 2 H,
J ) 6.8 Hz, CHMe2), 1.53 (s, 6 H, Me), 1.45 (d, 6 H, J ) 6.8 Hz,
CHMe2), 1.13 (d, 6 H, J ) 6.7 Hz, CHMe2), 1.12 (d, 6 H, J ) 6.8 Hz,
CHMe2), 1.08 (d, 6 H, J ) 6.8 Hz, CHMe2), -0.04 (s, 9 H, SiMe3).
13C NMR (d8-toluene, 125.76 MHz): δ 211.9 (Al-C), 187.2 (Al-C),
173.2 (CN), 148.9, 144.2, 143.6, 139.6, 137.5, 128.8, 128.1, 125.3,
125.1, 124.9, 123.6 (Ph), 97.3 (γ-C), 29.1, 28.9 (CHMe2), 25.4, 24.7,
24.5, 24.1 (CHMe2), 23.6 (Me), 2.2 (SiMe3). 29Si NMR (d8-toluene,
99.36 MHz): δ -20.5.
Synthesis of LAl[O2(CPh2)2] (6). A solution of LAlI2 (1) (1.4 g, 2
mmol) and Ph2CO (0.36 g, 2 mmol) in toluene (15 mL) was added to
a suspension of finely divided potassium (0.16 g, 4.1 mmol). Im-
mediately a purple color was observed. The mixture was stirred at room
temperature for 24 h and the solution finally developed a red color.
After filtration the filtrate was concentrated and stored at -30 °C
overnight to afford yellow crystals of 6 (0.56 g, 35%). Mp: 272 °C.
(7) For examples: (a) Scha¨fer, W. Angew. Chem. 1966, 78, 716; Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1966, 5, 669. (b) Eisch, J. J.; Harrell, R. L., Jr. J.
Organomet. Chem. 1969, 20, 257. (c) Clark, G. M.; Zweifel, G. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1971, 93, 527. (d) Albright, M. J.; Butler, W. M.; Anderson, T.
J.; Glick, M. D.; Oliver, J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 3995. (e) Hoberg,
H.; Gotor, V. J. Organomet. Chem. 1977, 127, C32. (d) Hoberg, H.; Aznar,
F. J. Organomet. Chem. 1980, 193, 161.
(8) (a) Eisch, J. J.; Amtmann, R. J. Org. Chem. 1972, 37, 3410. (b)
Stucky, G. D.; McPherson, A. M.; Rhine, W. E.; Eisch, J. J.; Considine, J.
L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 1941. (c) Hoberg, H.; Aznar, F. J.
Organomet. Chem. 1978, 141, 1. (d) Hoberg, H.; Aznar, F. J. Organomet.
Chem. 1980, 193, 155.
(9) (a) Hoberg, H.; Gotor, V.; Milchereit, A.; Kru¨ger, C.; Sekutowski,
J. C. Angew. Chem. 1977, 89, 563; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1977, 16,
539. (b) Hoberg, H.; Aznar, F. J. Organomet. Chem. 1979, 164, C13.
(10) (a) Schno¨ckel, H.; Leimku¨hler, M.; Lotz, R.; Mattes, R. Angew.
Chem. 1986, 98, 929; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1986, 25, 921. (b)
U¨ ffing, C.; Ecker, A.; Ko¨ppe, R.; Merzweiler, K.; Schno¨ckel, H. Chem.
Eur. J. 1998, 4, 2142.
(11) Perrin, D. D.; Armarego, W. L. F. Purification of Laboratory
Chemicals, 3rd ed.; Pergamon: London, 1988.
(12) (a) Qian, B.; Ward, D. L.; Smith, M. R., III Organometallics 1998,
17, 3070. (b) Budzelaar, D. H. M.; van Oort, A. B.; Orpen, A. G. Eur. J.
Inorg. Chem. 1998, 1485.
(13) Schulz, S.; Voigt, A.; Roesky, H. W.; Ha¨ming, L.; Herbst-Irmer,
R. Organometallics 1996, 15, 5252.
(14) Twamley, B.; Hwang, C.-S.; Hardman, N. J.; Power, P. P. J.
Organomet. Chem. 2000, 609, 152.
(15) Sheldrick, G. M. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A 1990, 46, 467.
(16) Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXL, Program for Crystal Structure Refine-
ment; University of Go¨ttingen: Go¨ttingen, Germany, 1997.