The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
ARTICLE
’ ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We thank Dr. Lei Wang for helpful discussions. We are pleased
to acknowledge that several preliminary experiments were
carried out in the laboratory of Professor N. J. Turro at
Columbia University, with the assistance of Dr. Steffen Jockusch.
We are grateful to the National Science Foundation for financial
support.
Figure 9. (a) B97D/6-311+G(d) computed structure for PNPCCÀ
Pr2O O-ylide 6. (b) HOMO of 6. (c) LUMO of 6.
’ REFERENCES
(1) Moss, R. A.; Wang, L.; Odorisio, C. M.; Krogh-Jespersen, K.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 10677–10679.
(2) Wang, L.; Moss, R. A.; Krogh-Jespersen, K. J. Phys. Chem A 2011,
115, 8113–8118.
constants for species 5 and 6, in qualitative good agreement with
experimental observations.
Figure 9a illustrates the conformer of lowest energy for
PNPCCÀPr2O O-ylide 6 (analogous computed structures of 4
and 5 are available as Figure 4 in ref 4). The computed electronic
transitions (Table 3) are blue-shifted by only 10À20 nm relative
to the experimental peaks and thus compare favorably (Table 2).
The identifying absorption near 450 nm arises as the result of a
very pure (>95%) HOMO f LUMO transition, which contains
significant charge-transfer character. The HOMO is a relatively
well-localized lone pair (essentially of π-type symmetry) on the
carbene carbon with some admixture from the phenyl ring; the
LUMO is a phenyl π* orbital with considerable contributions
from the p-NO2 substituent (parts b and c of Figure 9, respectively).
Neither the HOMO nor the LUMO contains much O(ether)
character, which rationalizes the insensitivity of the PNPCCÀ
ether O-ylide signature transition, in energy and intensity, to the
specific nature of the alkyl ether.
(3) Wang, L.; Moss, R. A.; Thompson, J.; Krogh-Jespersen, K. Org.
Lett. 2011, 13, 1198–1201.
(4) Moss, R. A.; Wang, L.; Weintraub, E.; Krogh-Jespersen, K.
J. Phys. Chem. A 2008, 112, 4651–4659.
(5) Bonneau, R.; Liu, M. T. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 744–747.
(6) (a) Celebi, S.; Tsao, M.-L.; Platz, M. S. J. Phys. Chem. A 2001,
105, 1158–1162. (b) Tsao, M.-L.; Zhu, Z.; Platz, M. S. J. Phys. Chem. A
2001, 105, 8413–8416.
(7) The spectroscopic signature of the O-ylide was not observed.
Equilibration was deduced from the LFP-UV monitored kinetics of the
parallel formation of the N-ylide of pyridine.8
(8) Tippmann, E. M.; Platz, M. S.; Svir, I. B.; Klymenko, O. V. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 5750–5762.
(9) For more details, see: Moss, R. A.; Tian, J.; Sauers, R. R.; Ess,
D. H.; Houk, K. N.; Krogh-Jespersen, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007,
129, 5167–5174. The current pulse width is broader than reported in
the previous study.
(10) Parr, R. G.; Yang, W. Density-Functional Theory of Atoms and
Molecules; University Press: Oxford, U.K., 1989.
4. CONCLUSIONS
(11) Frisch, M. J. et al. Gaussian 09, revision A.02; Gaussian, Inc.:
Pittsburgh, PA, 2009. See reference 1 in the Supporting Information for
the complete reference to Gaussian 09.
(12) Grimme, S. J. Comput. Chem. 2006, 27, 1787–1799.
(13) (a) Zhao, Y.; Truhlar, D. G. J. Phys. Chem. A 2006, 110,
5121–5129. (b) Zhao, Y.; Truhlar, D. G. Theor. Chim. Acc. 2008, 120,
215–241.
p-Nitrophenylchlorocarbene reacts reversibly with diethyl
ether, di-n-propyl ether, or tetrahydrofuran (THF) to form
O-ylides. These can be visualized by their UVÀvis spectroscopic
signatures. Equilibrium constants (Keq) could be determined
spectroscopically and ranged from 0.10 MÀ1 (di-n-propyl ether)
to 7.5 MÀ1 (THF) at 295 K. Studies of Keq as a function of tem-
perature afforded ΔHo, ΔSo, and ΔGo values for the di-n-propyl
ether and THF/O-ylide equilibria. ΔHo was favorable for ylide
formation, but ΔSo was quite negative (∼À30 eu). Therefore
ΔGos for the equilibria were small, ∼ À1.2 kcal/mol for THF
and +1.3 kcal/mol for di-n-propyl ether. Electronic structure
calculations based on density functional theory provided struc-
tures, spectroscopic signatures, and energetics for the carbene/
ether O-ylides. Comparisons of the computed and experimental
data were generally satisfactory.
(14) Chai, J.-D.; Head-Gordon, M. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2008,
10, 6615–6620.
(15) (a) Ditchfield, R.; Hehre, W. J.; Pople, J. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1971,
54, 724–728. (b) Hariharan, P. C.; Pople, J. A. Mol. Phys. 1974,
27, 209–214. (c) Krishnan, R.; Binkley, J. S.; Seeger, R.; Pople, J. A.
J. Chem. Phys. 1980, 72, 650–654. (d) McLean, A. D.; Chandler, G. S.
J. Chem. Phys. 1980, 72, 5639–5648. (e) Clark, T.; Chandrasekhar, J.;
Spitznagel, G. W.; Schleyer, P. v. R. J. Comput. Chem. 1983, 4, 294–301.
(16) Barone, V.; Cossi, M. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 1995–2001.
(17) McQuarrie, D. A. Statistical Thermodynamics; Harper and Row:
New York, 1973.
(18) Casida, M. E.; Jamorski, C.; Casida, K. C.; Salahub, D. R.
J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 108, 4439–4449.
’ ASSOCIATED CONTENT
(19) (a) Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648–5652. (b) Lee,
C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R. G. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785–789.
(20) Calibration corrects the raw UVÀvis absorptions for wave-
length-dependent variations in sample absorptivity (including precursor
diazirine), xenon monitoring lamp emission, and detector sensitivity.
(21) In the uncalibrated spectrum in pentane, reproduced in ref 4,
the π f p absorption appears at 316 nm, and the σ f p absorption at
628 nm is much more pronounced.
S
Supporting Information. Figures S-1ÀS-2; Tables
b
S-1ÀS-3; complete reference to Gaussian 09; B97D/6-311+G-
(d) optimized geometries and absolute energies of THF; Et2O,
Pr2O, 4, 5, and 6; TD-B3LYP/6-311+G(d)//B97D/6-311+G-
(d) electronic excitation energies and oscillator strenths for THF,
Et2O, Pr2O, 4, 5, and 6. This material is available free of charge
(22) Thus, the interaction between the phenyl π-type orbitals and
the (formally empty) carbene p orbital leads to a computed σÀp
(HOMOÀLUMO) gap in PNPCC, which is too small. The tendency
of DFT to underestimate the separation between occupied and unoccupied
levels for weakly interacting systems, and thus of TD-DFT to underestimate
the electronic excitation energies when local, time-independent functionals
’ AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
*E-mail: moss@rutchem.rutgers.edu (R.A.M); krogh@rutchem.
rutgers.edu (K.K.-J.).
362
dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp2098119 |J. Phys. Chem. A 2012, 116, 358–363